Kinder Morgan, Inc. · NYSE:KMI

Kinder Morgan — 2003 Analyst Conference

57 slides from Kinder Morgan's conference presentation, Jan 22, 2003

  1. Slide 1: Natural Gas Pipelines

    Natural Gas Pipelines Deb Macdonald

  2. Slide 2: Infrastructure Development

    Infrastructure Development

  3. Slide 3: Need for Natural Gas Infrastructure

    Need for Natural Gas Infrastructure EIA predicts demand for natural gas to grow at 2% per year from 23 Tcf currently to 34 Tcf by 2020. Foster Associates indicates peak day requirements will grow from approximately 131 Bcf/d currently to over 170 Bcf/d in 2020. National Petroleum Council predicts th

  4. Slide 4: Challenges for Infrastructure Development

    Challenges for Infrastructure Development FERC’s review of its Negotiated Rate Policy  Has allowed sponsors/shippers to negotiate project benefits/risks  Majority of new projects have been done with Negotiated Rates  Provides long-term certainty for sponsors and shippers Turmoil in the “Merchant

  5. Slide 5: Kinder Morgan Advantages

    Kinder Morgan Advantages Opportunity  Large existing asset base leads to significant expansion and extension opportunities Access to Capital  Best in class balance sheet ensures access to capital Efficient Structure  MLP efficiently capitalizes long-lived pre-tax assets Low cost discipline 5

  6. Slide 6: Infrastructure Development

    Infrastructure Development Opal Wheatland Project Horizon Cheyenne Hub Advantage St. Louis Lateral Blanco TransColorado Blythe/ Extension Ehrenberg Silver Canyon NGPL Permian Expansion NGPL North Texas Pipeline KMTP / KM Tejas NGPL West North Lansing KMIGT Texas Waha Storage Trailblazer Pipeline Kat

  7. Slide 7: Areas of Focus Going Forward

    Areas of Focus Going Forward Incremental markets strategic to existing assets Mexico’s growing needs to import U.S. production Rocky Mountain/San Juan supply bottlenecks Southwest need for capacity 7

  8. Slide 8: Incremental Markets Strategic to Existing Assets

    Incremental Markets Strategic to Existing Assets NGPL Permian Expansion NGPL St. Louis Extension Horizon Pipeline NGPL North Lansing Storage Expansion North Texas 8

  9. Slide 9: NGPL Permian Expansion

    NGPL Permian Expansion 7,000 HP compression TW 60,500 Dth/day capacity 144 Eddy 167 $1.2 MM capex $1.5 MM annual lease payment January, 2002 in-service Indian NGPL Basin Plant TW NEW MEXICO Permian 139 TEXAS Expansion El El Paso Paso TW Winkler Waha Hub 9

  10. Slide 10: NGPL St. Louis Lateral

    50 miles of 24” pipe NGPL St. Louis Lateral 300,000 Dth/day capacity $37 MM capex 10 year contract life September, 2002 in-service Loudon Storage 206 St. Louis Lateral NGPL St. Louis 310 MISSOURI ILLINOIS 10

  11. Slide 11: NGPL North Lansing Storage Expansion

    NGPL North Lansing Storage Expansion 6,000 HP compression 17 new wells 10.7 Bcf additional capacity $35.6 MM capex 802 Fully contracted FERC approval received Projected Spring, 2003 in-service Dallas North Lansing NGPL Storage 388 Marshall Longview 304 11

  12. Slide 12: Horizon Pipeline

    Horizon Pipeline Joint venture with Nicor 28 miles of 36” pipe 42 miles of NGPL leased capacity 116 8,900 HP compression 380,000 Dth/day capacity 10 year average contract life Chicago $80 MM capex Horizon May, 2002 in-service Pipeline 113 110 202 201 ILLINOIS Herscher Storage 12

  13. Slide 13: North Texas Pipeline

    82 miles of 30” pipe North Texas Pipeline 325,000 Dth/day capacity 30 year contract life $70 MM capex September, 2002 in-service Station North Texas 802 Pipeline NGPL Dallas North Lansing Storage 388 304 13

  14. Slide 14: Mexico

    Mexico Monterrey Pipeline West Texas Pipeline 14

  15. Slide 15: The National Challenge

    The National Challenge SUPPLY DEMAND BALANCE 2002-2010 Imports (Bcfd) National Supply Demand 10 9.5 9 9.0 1.9 8.5 1.7 8.3 1.4 8 7.8 1.6 ••By By2010 2010 imports imports in in the the 7.3 1.9 amount amountofof 1.9 1.9Bcfd Bcfd will willbe be 6.8 7.3 7.6 7 1.8 7.1 required required 1.6 6.7 6.2 6 1.1 •

  16. Slide 16: Demand Growth by Market Segment

    Demand Growth by Market Segment DEMAND BY SECTOR 2000-2010 Transportation (Bcfd) Residential & Services Power Generation Industry 10 Oil Industry (Pemex self supply) 9 8 7 6 5 4 3 2 1 0 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Source: Prospectiva del Mercado de Gas Natural 2001-2010, S

  17. Slide 17: Monterrey Pipeline

    Monterrey Pipeline Mexico Texas Corpus Christi Laredo U.S. scope-9 miles of 30” pipe Mexico scope-137.5 km of 30” pipe 375,000 Dth/day capacity $80 MM capex Monterrey Fully contracted for 15 years Pipeline Under Construction Projected April, 2003 in-service McAllen Iberdrola Power Plant Proposed Mon

  18. Slide 18: Proposed West Texas Pipeline

    Proposed West Texas Pipeline Proposed Texas Hinshaw pipeline Agreement in Principle with PEMEX 144 167 196 miles of 24” pipe 12,400 HP compression NGPL 300,000 Dth/day capacity TW NNG $149 MM capex Projected June, 2004 in-service NEW MEXICO EPNG 139 EPNG TEXAS El Hueco C.S. El Paso Paso NNG Proposed

  19. Slide 19: Rocky Mountain/Southwest

    Rocky Mountain/Southwest Trailblazer Expansion – Completed Trailblazer Expansion – Proposed CMC Storage Expansion Advantage Wheatland TransColorado Silver Canyon 19

  20. Slide 20: Powder River Basin Coal Bed Methane

    Powder River Basin Coal Bed Methane MMcfd: Total Reserves estimated at 25 Tcf -- >70 years of production at current rates 1000 900 800 700 600 MMcfd 500 400 300 200 100 0 Jan-95 Jan-96 Jan-97 Jan-98 Jan-99 Jan-00 Jan-01 Jan-02 20

  21. Slide 21: Cheyenne to NGPL Basis

    Cheyenne to NGPL Basis Since Inception of Cheyenne Posting 3.000 2.500 Approval/construction time for 2.000 new pipeline project 1.500 1.000 0.500 0.000 May-00 Nov-00 Feb-01 May-01 Nov-01 Feb-02 May-02 Nov-02 Feb-03 May-03 Nov-03 Feb-04 May-04 Nov-04 Feb-05 May-05 Nov-05 Aug-00 Aug-01 Aug-02 Aug-03

  22. Slide 22: Kansas Hugoton Production Declining

    Kansas Hugoton Production Declining 2000 757 MMcfd Loss since 1996 1800 1600 1400 ~10% annual decline 1200 MMcfd 1000 800 600 400 200 0 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 22

  23. Slide 23: Trailblazer Pipeline

    Trailblazer Pipeline 50,000 HP compression at 3 stations 324,000 Dth/day capacity $50 MM capex 10 year average contract life April, 2002 in-service Casper WYOMING NEBRASKA Cheyenne Omaha Cheyenne 196 NNG Hub WNG 601 602 CIG 603 106 Denver NGPL COLORADO 195 Trailblazer Pipeline Compressor Station NGP

  24. Slide 24: Trailblazer Expansion Scenarios

    Trailblazer Expansion Scenarios 50,000 /Dth day expansion 30 miles of looping $32.5 MM capex 75,000 /Dth day expansion Trailblazer Pipeline 58 miles of looping $64.3 MM capex 100,000 / Dth day expansion 87 miles of looping $94.1 MM capex Projected July 2004 In-service 601 Omaha CHEYENNE 602 HUB 196

  25. Slide 25: Cheyenne Market Center

    11,300 HP compression 10 new wells Cheyenne Market Center 6.0 Bcf additional capacity $28.4 MM capex Fully contracted for 10 years January 2002 FERC application Projected Summer, 2004 in-service Nebraska Wyoming Huntsman Storage CIG Cheyenne Cheyenne Hub Proposed Advantage Pipeline KMIGT Pipeline Tr

  26. Slide 26: KMIGT's Proposed Advantage Pipeline

    KMIGT’s Proposed Pursuing binding agreements Advantage Pipeline 411 miles of 24” pipe 26,700 HP compression 330,000 Dth/day capacity $287 MM capex Projected October, 2005 in-service Cheyenne Nebraska Omaha Cheyenne Hub Denver NGPL NNG Kansas Colorado City Proposed Advantage Pipeline PEPL Proposed Ad

  27. Slide 27: KMIGT's Proposed Wheatland Expansion Project

    KMIGT’s Proposed Wheatland Expansion Project Pursuing binding agreements 80,000 Dth/day capacity WYOMING Approx. 12,000 HP new compression $28 MM capex Projected October, 2005 in-service NEBRASKA Cheyenne Omaha WHEATLAND PROJECT Cheyenne Proposed Compression Hub NNG ANR Added Capacity from add’l Com

  28. Slide 28: TransColorado-Silver Canyon

    TransColorado-Silver Canyon Opal WYOMING Green River Cheyenne Washakie Salt Lake City Cheyenne Hub D-J Basin Piceance Uinta Greasewood Denver Grand Junction UTAH COLORADO Olathe C.S. Paradox Dolores C.S. Coyote Gulch Plant Farmington Blanco Las Vegas ARIZONA San Juan N E W M E X I C O Flagstaff Tran

  29. Slide 29: TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy

    TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy TransColorado Options: 150 MMcf/d incremental long-haul capability from mainline compression additions Potential extensions to supply sources Potential mainline looping for additional long-haul capability Potential 750 MMcf/d extension from Blanco to Gallup/Windo

  30. Slide 30: TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy

    TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy Silver Canyon Options: 750 MMCf/d capacity from Gallup/Window Rock Delivery options in New Mexico, Phoenix area, Blythe/Ehrenberg into SoCal Gas and North Baja Potential interconnects with proposed storage developments: Desert Crossing and Copper Eagle in Arizona

  31. Slide 31: TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy

    TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy Benefits: Outlet for Rocky Mountain production Relieves San Juan Triangle constraints Develops Gallup/Window Rock as hub interconnecting to Silver Canyon, Transwestern and El Paso Natural Gas – with downstream optionality on moving gas east or west Meets the need

  32. Slide 32: TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy

    TransColorado/Silver Canyon Strategy Estimated Capex:  TransColorado - up to $250 million  Silver Canyon - up to $740 million Potential in-service dates:  From 2nd quarter 2004 to 2nd quarter 2006 depending on customer needs 32

  33. Slide 33: Success to Date

    Success to Date Internal Growth Projects at Kinder Morgan both at KMI and KMP  $238.2 million completed in 2002, 5 projects*  $293.6 million contracted/in process, 4 projects  5 additional projects proposed/open season Existing asset base provides platform for growth Expansions and new projects s

  34. Slide 34: Overall Gas Pipeline Update

    KINDER’ MORGAN Overall Gas Pipeline Update

  35. Slide 35: KMP Natural Gas Pipelines Segment Overview

    KMP Natural Gas Pipelines Segment Overview (a) Red Cedar/ Products Other Pipelines Rockies 36% 11% Trailblazer Natural 14% Texas Gas Intrastates Pipelines 51% 30% Terminals KMIGT 19% 24% CO2 Pipelines 15% (a) 2003 budgeted distributable cash flow before allocation of G&A G&A and interest 35

  36. Slide 36: KMP Pipelines' Trend

    KMP Pipelines’ Trend ’01 Actuals ’02 Budget ’02 Actuals ’03 Budget Income before DD&A $227 MM $347 MM $325 MM $365 MM Growth from ’01 to ’02 • Tejas acquisition • Trailblazer expansion/acquisition of Enron/CIG interests Deficit from ’02 budget of $22 MM • KMTP’ KMTP’s conversion to fee- fee-based st

  37. Slide 37: NGPL Impact on KMI Earnings

    NGPL Impact on KMI Earnings 2002 2003 Budget Power Trans- Power Trans- 2% Colorado and Other Colorado 2% 2% 5% Retail Retail 8% 8% KMP KMP 42% 45% NGPL NGPL 43% 43% $360 million $377 million (a) 2002 results and 2003 budgeted segment earnings before allocation allocation of G&A and interest expense.

  38. Slide 38: Pipeline Update

    Pipeline Update KMIGT  Stable earnings base  Long-term contracts (average 7(transport) to 8 (storage) years)  Existing assets subject to limited competition  Increase in Rocky Mountain production will drive growth Trailblazer  Stable earnings base  Long-term contracts (average 8 years)  Incre

  39. Slide 39: Pipeline Update

    Pipeline Update Horizon  Stable earnings base  Long-term contracts (average 9 years)  Platform for expansion to serve power generation growth in Northern Illinois, Indiana, and Wisconsin TransColorado  Extraordinary earnings growth from 2001 to 2002  Substantial increase in production adjacent

  40. Slide 40: NGPL Update

    KINDER’ MORGAN NGPL Update

  41. Slide 41: Rollover Negotiations Completed

    Rollover Negotiations Completed NICOR  997,000 dt/d FTS  24.4 Bcf DSS  16.4 Bcf NSS  Rolled for 3- 3-year term  Sold incremental 84,500 dt/d FTS Dec. ‘02 – Feb. –’03 NIPSCO  255,100 peak/138,000 off- off-peak dt/d long- long-haul FTS  10.5 Bcf DSS  80,000 dt/d market- market-area FTS  40,00

  42. Slide 42: Rollover Negotiations Completed

    Rollover Negotiations Completed Peoples  19.2 BCF NSS; Rolled for 3 years  175,000 peak/29,000 off-peak dt/d market area (short-haul) FTS  Rolled for 3-year term and extended 65,000/d peak/29,000/d off-peak dt/d to long-haul FTS at higher rate Wisconsin Electric  71,000 dt/d long-haul FTS rolled

  43. Slide 43: NGPL FTS Capacity Summary

    NGPL FTS Capacity Summary (Volumes in TBtu/d) Louisiana and Long Haul Total Crosshaul Contract MDQ 2.01 .63 2.64 Expiring in 2003 Re-contracted 1.29 .46 1.76 Remaining .72 .17 .90 Capacity 43

  44. Slide 44: Renegotiation of NSS

    Renegotiation of NSS Summary for 2003 Available Capacity 88.6 TBtu expiring /available in 2003 Sold 64.2 TBtu sold Average term = 3.34 years (23 month to 5 year contracts) Average rate = $.4750 (max rate = $.4912) Remaining 24.4 TBtu expiring in March - April 44

  45. Slide 45: Renegotiation of DSS

    Renegotiation of DSS Summary for 2003 Available Capacity 21.73 TBtu expiring in 2003 Sold 21.68 TBtu sold Average Term = 2.43 years Average Rate = $1.248 (max rate = $1.368) Remaining 0.05 TBtu expiring in the fall 45

  46. Slide 46: Natural's Gas Fired Power Generation Market

    Natural’s Gas Fired Power Generation Market Megawatts under construction for in-service thru 2004… Gas Fired Generation Developed on Natural Gas Pipeline 20000 15000 Megawatts Peaker 10000 Baseload 5000 Total 0 Before 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 '99 Year Plant in Service Before '99 1999 2000 2001

  47. Slide 47: Texas Intrastate Pipeline Group Update

    Texas Intrastate Pipeline Group Update

  48. Slide 48: Gulf Coast System

    Gulf Coast System Houston KM Texas-2,500 mile system 2.0 Bcf/day peak capacity KM Tejas-3,400 mile system W. Clear Lake 3.4 Bcf/day peak capacity Tejas-Stratton Ridge Storage-12 Bcf working capacity KMTP-Stratton Ridge Hubs-Katy, Agua Dulce, HSC Markham Storage Mexico Texas Laredo Corpus Christi KM

  49. Slide 49: Strategy – Texas Intrastate Group

    Strategy – Texas Intrastate Group Integration of Tejas and KMTP  Physical interconnects  Commercial integration Minimize commodity and basis risk  Includes conversion to fee-based storage program Increase operational efficiencies  Fuel efficiency  Gas loss and unaccounted for Targeted market ex

  50. Slide 50: Electric Generation – Texas Intrastate Group

    Electric Generation – Texas Intrastate Group Electric Utility $11.0 MM Electric Utility Electric Utility Merchant $16.6 MM $14.5 MM Merchant Merchant $27.7 MM $30.8 MM $38.1 MM 2001: $44.3 MM 2002 est: $45.3 MM 2003 est: $49.1 MM 50

  51. Slide 51: Contracting Success – Texas Intrastate Group

    Contracting Success – Texas Intrastate Group BP  Firm Transportation and Storage − Term: September 1, 2002 to March 31, 2006 and year to year thereafter unless terminated with 2 years’ notice − Transport Volumes: 600,000/d ramping up to 1 Bcf/d in ’03 − Sales Volume: 50% of transport volume − Stora

  52. Slide 52: Contracting Success – Texas Intrastate Group

    Contracting Success – Texas Intrastate Group CPS at San Antonio  Combined firm transport/sales obligation of 50,000/d for 2-year term, July 1, 2002 to June 30, 2004 Praxair, Inc. – Sales contract  Texas City Facility − 100% requirements contract; 15 year term beginning 1st quarter of 2004 − Initia

  53. Slide 53: Regulatory Developments

    KINDER’ MORGAN Regulatory Developments

  54. Slide 54: Regulatory Developments

    Regulatory Developments Order No. 637  Almost a non-event for KM pipelines Tighter Creditworthiness Provisions  NGPL’s “test case” pending Review of Negotiated Rate Policy 54

  55. Slide 55: Regulatory Developments: Rate Case Filing Requirements

    Regulatory Developments Rate Case Filing Requirements NGPL − No filing requirement − Any change under NGA 5 prospective KMIGT − No filing requirement − Cost and revenue study in 2004 − Any change prospective TransColorado − No filing requirement − Any change prospective 55

  56. Slide 56: Regulatory Developments

    Regulatory Developments Horizon Pipeline − Three-year filing requirement − Section 4 filing due mid-2005 − Existing agreements are negotiated rate deals Rate Case Filing Requirements Trailblazer − Rate decrease filed November 29, 2002 − Rates effective January 1, 2003 − Hearing no later than October

  57. Slide 57: Pipeline Safety & Integrity Development

    Pipeline Safety & Integrity Development Pipeline Safety Improvement Act of 2002 Applies to interstate pipelines regulated by DOT Baseline integrity assessments required in high consequence areas within 10 years  50% of highest risk segments must be completed within 5 years Reassessment required eve

Kinder Morgan — 2003 Analyst Conference on 6ix