Newamsterdam Pharma Company N.v. · NASDAQ:NAMS

Newamsterdam Pharma — Investor Presentation (January 2024)

38 slides from Newamsterdam Pharma's investor presentation, Jan 8, 2024

  1. Slide 1: NewAmsterdam Pharma

    Exhibit 99.2 bonis NewAmsterdam Pharma

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer This presentation (together with oral statements made in connection herewith, this “Presentation”) is for informational purposes only. This Presentation shall not constitute an offer to sell, or the solicitation of an offer to buy, any securities, nor shall there be any sale of securities

  3. Slide 3: Obicetrapib in multiple Phase 3 trials – key data expected in 2024

    Obicetrapib in multiple Phase 3 trials for hypercholesterolemia – Key value- driving data expected in 2024 Multiple pivotal data readouts Significant unmet need for oral LDL-lowering therapy as adjunct to expected from 2024-2026 statins: • 1Q 2024: Complete Phase 3 enrollment for PREVAIL • 35mm+ pat

  4. Slide 4: Obicetrapib designed to address ~30M US patients on drug but not at goal

    Obicetrapib designed to address the ~30M patients in US on drug but not at goal ~18 million ~43 million Not at goal of LDL-C Treated primary <100mg/dl prevention patients Of the ~30M treated patients not at goal, ~8 million ~72 million ~19 million High Risk ASCVD not at ~18M were “far from Adults in

  5. Slide 5: Majority of ASCVD/HeFH patients are not achieving LDL-C targets

    Majority of ASCVD/HeFH patients are not achieving LDL-C targets Primary prevention HeFH Despite availability of ASCVD patients with an LDL-C Very high risk ASCVD patients patients with treatments continue to see target of LDL<70 or <55 mg/dL with an LDL-C target <55 an LDL-C target <100 mg/dL minima

  6. Slide 6: Increased CV events following removal of LDL-C guidelines in 2013

    Increased CV events following removal of LDL-C guidelines in 2013 15 Risk of CV ≥70 LDL-C death, MI, 55-≤70 LDL-C LDL-C stroke goals Male deaths 40-≤55 LDL-C removed 10 in ≤20 LDL-C 2013 5 Female deaths P-value = 0.0001 5 0 0 1 2 3 4 5 Trends in prevalence of high LDL-C in US adults, 2 Time post-enr

  7. Slide 7: Resurgence of the “lower is better” paradigm driving US market growth

    Resurgence of the “lower is better” paradigm leading to significant US market growth 18% 3yr CAGR LDL-C goals removed Mortality 7% peaks 3yr CAGR Driven by generic ezetimibe, given 7% total market growth in 18% non-statin patient growth lack of convenient and efficacious the US alternatives Source:

  8. Slide 8: Few approved post-statin LDL lowering products, limited by efficacy, convenience, access

    Few approved post-statin LDL lowering products, which are limited by efficacy, convenience and/or payor access (5) (5) (4) (1) (2) (3) Obicetrapib Obi + Eze Oral PCSK9 Ezetimibe Nexletol PCSK9i LDL data 2026E LDL data 2024E Approved Approved Approved LDL data 2025E Approval (CVOT data 2029E) (CVOT d

  9. Slide 9: 50% LDL-C reduction comparable to high efficacy PCSK9 injectables

    50% LDL-C reduction comparable to high efficacy PCSK9 injectables Cross trial comparison of LDL-C reduction across different approaches (in %) Anacetrapib Evacetrapib Dalcetrapib Ezetimibe Nexletol Repatha Praluent Leqvio 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 100mg 130mg 600mg 10mg 180mg 420mg 150mg 284mg 0 Prior CETP in

  10. Slide 10: Obicetrapib designed to overcome limitations of prior CETP inhibitors

    Obicetrapib program designed to overcome limitations of prior CETP inhibitors (3) (1) (2) (4) (5) Evacetrapib Torcetrapib Dalcetrapib Anacetrapib Obicetrapib Observed LDL-C reduction -20% -7% -17% -43% -21% 80% 40% 65% 90% 98% CETP inhibition Dosing 60mg 600mg 100mg 100mg 10mg Yes No No No No Blood

  11. Slide 11: Obicetrapib Phase 1/2 studies: consistent benefits in lipid biomarkers

    Obicetrapib Phase 1/2 studies: Consistent benefits observed in lipid biomarkers Phase 1 MAD ROSE ROSE2 Japan Pooled data TA-8995-06 TULIP N=10 per arm N=40 per arm N=26 per arm N=26 per arm N=132 N=13 per arm N=35 per arm Median LS Mean Source: Company data for obicetrapib 10mg monotherapy, Pooled d

  12. Slide 12: Sufficient cash to fund multiple pivotal data readouts 2024-2026

    Sufficient cash expected to fund the Company through multiple potential pivotal data readouts 2024-2026 2024 2022 2023 2024 2025 2026 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H 1H 2H Phase 3 BROADWAY Trial Lipid Mono Study BROADWAY Ph3 (HeFH or ASCVD; LDL-C ≥ 55 mg/dL; LDL n=2,532) regulatory filing BROOKLYN Ph3 Phase

  13. Slide 13: 2023 achievements pave the way for 2024 value inflection milestones

    2023 achievements pave the way for potential 2024 value inflection milestones 2Q 2023 3Q 2023 2H 2023 Complete enrollment Present ROSE2 Complete enrollment for Topline Japan Initial Alzheimer’s Select formulation for for BROOKLYN Phase 3 full data at NLA BROADWAY Phase 3 Phase 2b results Phase 2a da

  14. Slide 14: Obicetrapib for Cardiovascular Disease

    Obicetrapib for Cardiovascular Disease 14

  15. Slide 15: Exceptional LDL goal attainment with ezetimibe + obicetrapib combination

    Exceptional LDL goal attainment observed with ezetimibe + obicetrapib combination, including >87% of patients observed to attain <55 mg/dl LDL-C levels % of patients observed with the following LDL-C levels: <100 mg/dl <70 mg/dl <55 mg/dl 100% 93.5% 88.5% 87.1% 73.1% 66.7% 87.1% 73% of combo recipie

  16. Slide 16: Lp(a) percent reduction from baseline in ROSE and ROSE2

    1 2 Lp(a) percent reduction from baseline in ROSE and ROSE2 • Lp(a) is emerging as a strong and independent marker of CVD risk and an exciting new CVD drug target ROSE2 ROSE Placebo Obicetrapib 5mg Obicetrapib 10mg Obicetrapib 10mg Obi 10mg / Eze 10mg 10 10 4 0 0 -10 -10 -20 -20 -30 -30 -34 -40 -40

  17. Slide 17: Obicetrapib/ezetimibe lowers LDL-C by 63.4% on top of HIS in ROSE2

    Obicetrapib/ezetimibe observed to lower LDL-C by 63.4% on top of HIS in ROSE2 LDL-C (mg/dL), on-treatment population Median (min, max) LDL-C levels (mg/dL) at baseline & EoT Placebo Obicetrapib 10 mg Obi 10 / Eze 10 10 Time Placebo Obi 10 mg Obi 10 / Eze 10 0 95.5 100.0 87.0 Baseline -10 (60, 211) (

  18. Slide 18: ROSE2: Non-HDL-C and ApoB percent change from baseline

    ROSE2: Non-HDL-C and ApoB percent change from baseline (Day 84) Non-HDL-C (mg/dL), on-treatment population ApoB (mg/dL), on-treatment population Placebo Obicetrapib 10 mg Obi 10 / Eze 10 Placebo Obicetrapib 10 mg Obi 10 / Eze 10 10 10 5 0 0 -10 -5.6 -5 -2.1 -20 -10 -30 -15 -20 -40 -37.5 -25 -24.2 -5

  19. Slide 19: LDL-P believed to be a robust predictor of cardiovascular risk

    LDL-P believed to be one of the most robust predictors of cardiovascular risk • Small dense LDL particles are more likely to be trapped in arterial wall than larger-sized LDL particles • High LDL-P levels typically signify that a patient has a Low LDL-P confers a lower risk higher proportion of smal

  20. Slide 20: ROSE2 showed significant reduction in total and small LDL particles

    ROSE2 showed significant reduction in total and small LDL particles, bringing patients (1) who had baseline elevated LDL-P to optimal parameters Patients taking the Obi/Eze combo Total LDL-P Small LDL-P observed to achieve optimal LDL-P profiles Lipoprotein ROSE2 ROSE2 fractionation 1 placebo Obi /

  21. Slide 21: Stronger LDL-lowering with ezetimibe in obicetrapib combo vs. with statins

    Stronger LDL-lowering observed with ezetimibe in obicetrapib combo vs. ezetimibe with (1) statins, potentially due to a synergistic mechanism of action for obi/eze combo Obicetrapib is designed to promote more cholesterol excretion Eze on top Eze on top into the intestines (via TICE) while ezetimibe

  22. Slide 22: Favorable safety profile observed in all LDL Phase 2 & 3 clinical studies

    Favorable safety profile observed in all LDL Phase 1 & 2 clinical studies (1) (2) Comparator Pooled Obicetrapib (5, 10mg) (N=231) (N=309) TEAEs (%) TEAEs, total 136 (58.9) 173 (55.9) TEAEs, related 45 (19.5) 49 (15.8) TEAEs, severe 5 (2.2) 7 (2.3) TESAEs *TESAEs, total 6 (2.6) 4 (1.3) TESAEs, relate

  23. Slide 23: Obicetrapib does not show an effect on blood pressure

    Obicetrapib does not show an effect on systolic and diastolic blood pressure • A dedicated meta-analysis of the obicetrapib ROSE2, ROSE, TULIP, OCEAN, and TA-8995-203 study did not reveal any signal in systolic and diastolic blood pressure • By contrast, in the cardiovascular outcome trial ILLUMINAT

  24. Slide 24: PREVAIL trial design & power calculations leverage lessons learned

    PREVAIL trial design & power calculations leverage lessons learned Applying lessons from prior CVOTs • Study design: Greater LDL-lowering activity o n = 9000 Higher absolute LDL-C anticipated o Inclusion: ASCVD patients on maximally reduction expected to 42.6% observed in Phase 2 tolerated statins w

  25. Slide 25: Target biology and class overview: Key lessons learned

    Target biology and class overview: Key lessons learned 25

  26. Slide 26: Obicetrapib program designed to overcome limitations of all prior CETP inhibitors

    Obicetrapib program designed to overcome limitations of all prior CETP inhibitors SAFETY We believe that all prior CETPi were developed with a misguided focus on HDL increase (rather than LDL decrease) as the primary MoA for CVD risk reduction, 1 OFF-TARGET TOXICITY, T O R C E T R A P I B leading to

  27. Slide 27: Absolute LDL-C/ApoB reduction and its duration key to reducing cardiovascular risk

    Absolute reduction of LDL-C and ApoB, and duration of that reduction are believed to be key to reducing cardiovascular risk Key factor 1: Absolute reduction Key factor 2: Study duration CTT meta-regression line shows a linear and Meta-analysis of CVOT duration shows that ~3.5 year median predictable

  28. Slide 28: ACCELERATE, REVEAL and IMPROVE-IT support CVOT duration view

    ACCELERATE, REVEAL and IMPROVE-IT support our belief that CVOT study duration should be long enough to see optimal MACE benefit Kaplan-Meier curves for these trial, with very similar absolute ApoB reductions, show separation later than 2 years, which is the point in time that ACCELERATE stopped MACE

  29. Slide 29: REVEAL data supports translation from absolute LDL reduction to MACE benefit

    REVEAL data supports translation from absolute LDL reduction to MACE benefit EXPERIENCE: REVEAL (anacetrapib) Hypothetical: PREVAIL (obicetrapib) ~ ~ (1) 17% 61 mg/dL 11 mg/dL 105 mg/dL 43% 45 mg/dL Low Drug showed modest Results in SMALL absolute Enrich for higher Stronger expected Expected to resu

  30. Slide 30: REVEAL high tercile non-HDL-C data supports larger MACE benefit

    REVEAL data in high tercile in non-HDL-C supports larger MACE benefit EXPERIENCE: REVEAL (anacetrapib) Hypothetical: Obicetrapib (Phase 2 Studies) ~110 21% 23 mg/dL ~140 mg/dL 40% ~56 mg/dL mg/dL Non-HDL-C PREVAIL non-HDL-C high tercile Drug showed modest Results in SMALL absolute Non-HDL-C lowering

  31. Slide 31: Obicetrapib and Alzheimer’s Disease

    Obicetrapib and Alzheimer’s Disease 31

  32. Slide 32: CETP knock-in mice show increased brain cholesterol; CETPi rescues cognition

    CETP knock-in mice observed to increase brain cholesterol levels and CETPi rescues cognition in preclinical models of CETP-induced AD Control diet 1 % cholesterol diet p<0.05 p<0.05 1.6 1.2 CETPi shows 0.8 increased brain cholesterol 0.4 levels 0.0 WT CEPT WT CEPT Control diet 1 % cholesterol diet p

  33. Slide 33: CETP loss-of-function genotype may be associated with slower memory decline

    CETP loss-of-function (LoF) genotype may be associated with slower memory decline and lower AD risk • CETP’s potential involvement in CNS cholesterol homeostasis is supported by genetic data • CETP LoF genotype may be associated with lower CETP activity & a corresponding increase in HDL levels CETP

  34. Slide 34: Obicetrapib 10mg decreases 24s- & 27-hydroxycholesterol in plasma and CSF

    Initial data for Obicetrapib 10mg observed to decrease 24s- & 27-hydroxycholesterol (“OH”) in both plasma and cerebrospinal fluid (“CSF”) • In separate trials with different protocols and endpoints, Simvastatin was observed to only reduce 24s- and 27-OH in plasma • Obicetrapib was observed to be wel

  35. Slide 35: Clinical events and exclusivity timelines

    Clinical events and exclusivity timelines 35

  36. Slide 36: Projected exclusivity timelines in the EU and US

    Projected exclusivity timelines in the EU and US Assumes EU approval 4Q 2025 and US approval 1Q 2027 2023 2024 2025 2026 2027 2028 2029 2030 2031 2032 2033 2034 2035 2036 2037 2038 2039 2040 2041 2042 SPC max EU approval 10/35 10/36 EU Data exclusivity + market exclusivity (8 + 2 years) 10/40 10/1/2

  37. Slide 37: Expert cardiometabolic leadership supported by top investors

    Expert cardiometabolic leadership supported by top investors Michael Davidson, M.D. John Kastelein, M.D. Douglas Kling William ‘BJ’ Jones Ian Somaiya Louise Kooij Marc Ditmarsch, M.D. CEO CSO COO CCO CFO CAO CDO WILLIAM SANDER JULIET JAMIE NICHOLAS LOU MICHAEL JOHN JOHN W. JANNEKE SEASONED LEWIS SLO

  38. Slide 38: NewAmsterdam Pharma

    I” NewAmsterdam Ab Pharma

NewAmsterdam Pharma — Investor Presentation (January 2024) on 6ix