Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. · NASDAQ:FENC

Fennec Pharmaceuticals — Investor Presentation (September 2014)

26 slides from Fennec Pharmaceuticals's investor presentation, September 2014

  1. Slide 1: Corporate Presentation September 2014

    Corporate Presentation September 2014

  2. Slide 2: Safe Harbor Statement

    Safe Harbor Statement During the course of this presentation we will make statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These statements may include operating expense projections, the initiation, timing and results of pending or future clinical trials, the actions or potential action of the

  3. Slide 3: Company Overview

    Company Overview • Biopharmaceutical company dedicated to the development of novel cancer therapeutics • Two late stage clinical products: Sodium Thiosulfate (STS) and Eniluracil (EU) – STS: Received FDA Orphan Drug Designation with 7.5 yrs. pediatric exclusivity upon approval. – Positive data from

  4. Slide 4: Platinum Hearing Loss is Frequent, Severe and Irreversible

    Platinum Hearing Loss is Frequent, Severe and Irreversible Globally, ~7,000 children receive platinum based chemotherapy for localized cancers • USA: 2,000 EU: 3,000 RoW: 2,000 40-90% develop profound irreversible ototoxicity* • Ototoxicity is a dose-limiting side effect • Effect can be seen after a

  5. Slide 5: Devastating Impact on Quality of Life

    Devastating Impact on Quality of Life Even minimal hearing loss (MSHL) is damaging • High risk for being held back a grade (37% versus 3%) Neuroblastoma survivors with hearing loss • Twice the rate of parent reported problems with reading, math, attention and need for special education • Poorer chil

  6. Slide 6: Ototoxicity in Children Treated with Cisplatin and/or Carboplatin

    Ototoxicity in Children Treated with Cisplatin and/or Carboplatin* 61% bilateral hearing loss 100 (ASHA criteria) at the end 80 88 of treatment Ototoxicity (%) 75 41% required hearing aids 60 67 that only partially restore 50 40 hearing 20 22% of patients had dose reductions due to ototoxicity 11 0

  7. Slide 7: Target and Proposed STS Mechanism

    Target and Proposed STS Mechanism • Requires both Cl unbound to NH3 Antitumor Effect crosslink DNA • Binding to plasma proteins occurs Cl within first hour which inactivates NH3 Pt one binding site Cl • Free cDDP (unbound) short t1/2 :1.5 hr Ototoxicity Effect • Requires one Cl unbound to affect NH3

  8. Slide 8: COG ACCL0431: Randomized Phase 3 Study of STS for Prevention of Cisplatin-induced Hearing Loss

    COG ACCL0431: Randomized Phase 3 Study of STS for Prevention of Cisplatin-induced Hearing Loss • Newly diagnosed children with hepatoblastoma, germ cell tumor, osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, and others • Local and metastatic disease • Study Chair: David Freyer, DO, MS • 135 randomized

  9. Slide 9: COG ACCL0431: Specific Aims

    COG ACCL0431: Specific Aims Primary • Evaluate efficacy of STS for prevention of hearing loss in children receiving cisplatin chemotherapy (hypothesis: 50% relative reduction in hearing loss) Secondary • Compare change in mean hearing thresholds • Compare incidence of other Grade 3/4 toxicities (ren

  10. Slide 10: COG ACCL0431 Study Design

    COG ACCL0431 Study Design STS Arm STS 16 g/m2 IV Cisplatin per treatment over 15 min 6 hrs protocol post each cisplatin dose Cisplatin- based Randomize Standard audiometry at baseline and protocol ~24 hrs before each cisplatin course Cisplatin per treatment protocol OBS Arm Audiometry at 4 weeks and

  11. Slide 11: Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm

    Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm Proportion with Hearing Loss 1.00 0.90 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 OBS STS 56% 31/55 (56.4%) 29%(28.6%) 14/49 n=104 evaluable patients / p = 0.004

  12. Slide 12: Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm and Age

    Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm and Age 1.00 Proportion with Hearing Loss 0.90 p = 0.005 p = 0.103 0.80 0.70 0.60 0.50 0.40 0.30 0.20 0.10 0.00 Age <5 Age 5+ OBS 11/15 11/1573% (73.3%) (73.3%) 20/40 20/40 (50.0%) 50% (50.0%) 3/14(21.4%) 3/14 (21.4%) 11/35(31.4%) 11/35 (31.4%) STS 21% 31% n=104 evalua

  13. Slide 13: Change in Mean Hearing Thresholds by Randomized Arm

    Change in Mean Hearing Thresholds by Randomized Arm1 * NORMAL * *p < 0.05 for post-treatment comparison between arms * 1In patients with evaluable pre-post frequency-specific audiometry, n=84-94

  14. Slide 14: EFS/OS by Randomization Arm: All Patients

    EFS/OS by Randomization Arm All Patients, n=126 at median f/u of 2.9 yrs EFS by Randomization Arm OS by Randomization Arm 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 Estimated Proportion 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 Observation Observation STS 0.00 STS 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) Log Rank p = 0.31 Log Ran

  15. Slide 15: EFS/OS by Randomization Arm: Localized Disease Only

    EFS/OS by Randomization Arm Localized Disease Only, n=78 EFS by Randomization Arm (Localized Disease ) OS by Randomization Arm (Localized Disease) 1.00 1.00 0.75 Estimated Proportion 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 Observation Observation STS STS 0.00 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) Time (years)

  16. Slide 16: EFS/OS by Randomization Arm: Disseminated Disease Only

    EFS/OS by Randomization Arm Disseminated Disease Only, n=47 EFS by Randomization Arm (Metastatic Disease) OS by Randomization Arm (Metastatic Disease) 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 Estimated Proportion 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 Observation Observation STS 0.00 STS 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (yea

  17. Slide 17: SIOPEL 6 - Efficacy of STS in Reducing Ototoxicity in Hepatoblastoma Patients

    SIOPEL 6 - Efficacy of STS in Reducing Ototoxicity in Patients Receiving Cisplatin for Hepatoblastoma Patients D E L A Y E D cDDP 80 mg/m2 cDDP R A N D O M I S A T I O N 4 Cycles 2 Cycles S U R G E R Y cDDP 80 mg/m2 STS: 10-20 gm/m2 cDDP + STS depending on age/weight 2 Cycles 4 Cycles 80% power to d

  18. Slide 18: SIOPEL 6: Randomized Phase 3 Study of STS in Hepatoblastoma

    SIOPEL 6: Rand. Phase 3 Study - Efficacy of STS in Reducing Ototoxicity in Hepatoblastoma Patients • Newly diagnosed children with standard risk hepatoblastoma • Single localized disease with very high historic survival rates after cisplatin treatment • Study Chair: Peppy Brock, MD • 108 of 112 rand

  19. Slide 19: STS Market Opportunity

    STS Market Opportunity Pediatric Market Opportunity • Approximately 2,000 children receive platinum-based chemotherapy for localized disease in the US each year • Approximately 5,000 children receive platinum-based chemotherapy for localized disease in RoW each year Competitive Position • No alterna

  20. Slide 20: Market Research; Oncologists Comments

    Market Research; Oncologists Comments Pediatric oncologists were asked to comment on how the availability of STS would impact their treatment of patients. • “This product will definitely [address unmet needs]. It would probably become standard front- line therapy.” • “This product sounds very good.

  21. Slide 21: Market Research Payers Comments

    Market Research Payers Comments Payers were asked to provide comments regarding potential STS coverage decisions. General Comments: • “I think this could be the drug that changes how people practice. It would be malpractice NOT to use this when you’re giving platinum.” • “This is truly an unmet need

  22. Slide 22: STS: Development Timeline

    STS: Development Timeline Event Timing FDA Type C Clinical Development Meeting  Mar 2011 Presented to Pediatric ODAC  ODAC recognized challenge of demonstrating STS does not reduce efficacy of cisplatin and Nov 2011 agreed adult study would not be appropriate COG ACCL0431 Phase 3 Clinical Data  H

  23. Slide 23: STS Investment Highlights

    STS Investment Highlights • Significant unmet medical need with no approved treatment on market or in development • US Orphan Drug Designation (7.5 years market exclusivity) • Positive data from COG Phase 3 trial in localized disease • SIOPEL 6 safety data shows no tumor protective effect to this da

  24. Slide 24: Management and Board of Directors

    Management and Board of Directors BOARD OF DIRECTORS MANAGEMENT Rosty Raykov – Chairman and CEO Rosty Raykov – Chairman and CEO Adrian Haigh – Director Paul Dreyer – Commercial Development Khalid Islam – Director Lei Fang – Biostatistics Chris Rallis – Director Krysia Lynes – CFO Steve Skolsky – Dir

  25. Slide 25: Appendix: COG Patient Characteristics

    Appendix: COG Patient Characteristics Characteristic Observation (%) STS (%) Eligible 64 62 Age at enrollment (yrs) <5 22 (34.4) 22 (35.5) ≥5 42 (65.6) 40 (64.5) Sex Male 41 (64.1) 35 (56.5) Female 23 (35.9) 27 (43.5) Race White 39 (60.9) 43 (69.4) Black 10 (15.6) 5 (8.1) Other/Unknown 15 (23.4) 14

  26. Slide 26: Appendix: Patient Characteristics, continued

    Appendix: Patient Characteristics, continued Characteristic Observation (%) STS (%) Diagnosis Germ Cell Tumor 16 (25.0) 16 (25.8) Osteosarcoma 15 (23.4) 15 (24.2) Medulloblastoma 14 (21.9) 12 (19.4) Neuroblastoma 12 (18.8) 14 (22.6) Hepatoblastoma 5 (7.8) 2 (3.2) Other 2 (3.1) 3 (4.8) Extent of Dise

Fennec Pharmaceuticals — Investor Presentation (September 2014) on 6ix