Travere Therapeutics, Inc. · NASDAQ:TVTX

Travere Therapeutics — 61st European Renal Association (ERA) Congress 2024

17 slides from Travere Therapeutics's conference presentation, May 2024

  1. Slide 1: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of eGFR Slopes in the PROTECT Study (poster)

    Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of eGFR Slopes in the PROTECT Study With UK RaDaR IgA Nephropathy Population and the Control Arm of NefIgArd To obtain a PDF of this presentation, please scan the QR code. W. Gong1, U. Diva1, M. Bensink1, X. Chai2, Y. Xie3, S. Gao4, B. Hendry1, A. Mercer5, Z. Z

  2. Slide 2: Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of eGFR Slopes in the PROTECT Study

    Matching-Adjusted Indirect Comparisons of eGFR Slopes in the PROTECT Study with UK RaDaR IgA Nephropathy Population and the Control Arm of NefIgArd W. Gong1, U. Diva1, M. Bensink1, X. Chai2, Y. Xie2, S. Gao2, B. Hendry1, A. Mercer3, Z. Zhou2, B. Rovin4, J. Barratt5 1Travere Therapeutics, San Diego,

  3. Slide 3: Background

    Background • Immunoglobulin A (IgA) nephropathy is an immune complex-mediated glomerulonephritis, attributed to IgA deposition in the glomerular mesangium, leading to progressive loss of renal function and increased risk of kidney failure1 • PROTECT (NCT03762850) is a randomized, multicenter, double

  4. Slide 4: Introduction

    INTRODUCTION • The active control design of PROTECT warrants an understanding of PROTECT results relative to delivery of SOC treatment for IgAN in other clinical settings • In the absence of head-to-head randomized trials, this study aimed to compare 2-year eGFR total slope outcomes between the 2 ar

  5. Slide 5: Method: Data source and study outcome

    METHOD Data source • The following data were utilized in this study: • Individual patient-level data from the sparsentan (N=202) and irbesartan (N=202) arms of the PROTECT trial (NCT03762850) in patients with IgA nephropathy2 • Published aggregate data of a subset of patients with IgA nephropathy in

  6. Slide 6: Method: Statistical analysis

    METHOD Statistical analysis • Patients in the sparsentan or irbesartan arms of the PROTECT trial were weighted to match key baseline effect modifiers and prognostic factors of patients from RaDaR or patients from the control arm of the NefIgArd trial, respectively • Matching weights were estimated u

  7. Slide 7: Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in RaDaR: Patient characteristics

    RESULTS Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in RaDaR Patient characteristics • In contrast to patients in RaDaR, participants in the PROTECT trial had older age, a lower percentage of White patients, a higher percentage of Asian patients, lower systolic blood pressure (SBP), lower eGFR, lower urine pro

  8. Slide 8: Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics vs RaDaR SoC cohort

    RESULTS Table 1. Baseline patient characteristics of sparsentan and irbesartan arms from the PROTECT trial vs. the SoC cohort from RaDaR Irbesartan Sparsentan Before matching After matching Before matching After matching SoC from RaDaR Summary Difference Summary Difference Summary Difference Summary

  9. Slide 9: Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in RaDaR: Two-year eGFR total slope

    RESULTS Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in RaDaR Two-year eGFR total slope • After matching, patients treated with maximally titrated irbesartan in the PROTECT trial demonstrated a significantly reduced annual rate of kidney function decline (-4.2 ml/min/1.73m2) compared to those receiving SoC in a

  10. Slide 10: Figure 2. Comparisons of 2-year eGFR total slope in PROTECT and RaDaR

    RESULTS Figure 2. Comparisons of 2-year eGFR total slope in PROTECT and RaDaR Sparsentan in PROTECT Real-world SoC in RaDaR A Irbesartan in PROTECT Real-world SoC in RaDaR B -0.5 -0.5 Annualized 2-year eGFR total slope, -1.5 Annualized 2-year eGFR total slope, -1.5 ml/min/1.73m2 per year (SE) ml/min

  11. Slide 11: Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in NefIgArd: Patient characteristics

    RESULTS Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in NefIgArd Patient characteristics • In contrast to patients in NefIgArd, participants in the PROTECT trial had older age, higher blood pressures, lower eGFR, lower urine protein, a higher percentage of baseline diabetes, and a longer duration of time since

  12. Slide 12: Table 2. Baseline patient characteristics vs NefIgArd SoC arm

    RESULTS Table 2. Baseline patient characteristics of sparsentan and irbesartan arms from the PROTECT trial vs. the SoC arm from the NefIgArd Trial Irbesartan Sparsentan Before matching After matching Before matching After matching SoC from NefIgArd Summary Difference Summary Difference Summary Diffe

  13. Slide 13: Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in NefIgArd: Two-year eGFR total slope

    RESULTS Sparsentan and irbesartan vs SoC in NefIgArd Two-year eGFR total slope • After matching, similar results were observed when compared to SoC delivered in the clinical trial setting (NefIgArd) • Patients treated with maximally titrated irbesartan in the PROTECT trial demonstrated a significant

  14. Slide 14: Figure 3. Comparisons of 2-year eGFR total slope in PROTECT and NefIgArd

    RESULTS Figure 3. Comparisons of 2-year eGFR total slope in PROTECT and NefIgArd control arm RES A Irbesartan in PROTECT Optimized and stable RASi SOC in NefIgArd B Sparsentan in PROTECT Optimized and stable RASi SOC in NefIgArd ULTS -0.5 -0.5 Annualized 2-year eGFR total slope, Annualized 2-year eG

  15. Slide 15: Limitations

    LIMITATIONS • Similar to other indirect treatment comparisons, MAICs operate under the exchangeability of patients assumption, a premise that is difficult to definitively verify • Only baseline factors consistently reported across datasets could be aligned; results may be impacted by unreported or u

  16. Slide 16: Conclusions

    CONCLUSIONS • In PROTECT, maximally tolerated IRB was associated with a slower rate of kidney function decline than real-world SOC treatment in RaDaR and physician-defined, optimized SOC in NefIgArd • In PROTECT, SPAR was associated with a slower rate of kidney function decline than maximally tolera

  17. Slide 17: References

    REFERENCES 1. Barratt J, et al. Natural history of IgA nephropathy: Analysis of a UK National RaDaR IgA nephropathy cohort. J Am Soc Nephrol. 2021;32:S494. 2. Rovin BH, et al. Efficacy and safety of sparsentan versus irbesartan in patients with IgA nephropathy (PROTECT): 2-year results from a random

Travere Therapeutics — 61st European Renal Association (ERA) Congress 2024 on 6ix