Mountainview Energy · OTC:MNVWF

Mountainview Energy — Investor Presentation (May 2015)

29 slides from Mountainview Energy's investor presentation, May 2015

  1. Slide 1: Mountainview Energy Ltd.

    Mountainview Energy Ltd. May, 2015 1 Confidential

  2. Slide 2: Reader Advisory: Forward-Looking Statements

    Reader Advisory Forward‐Looking Statements / Oil and Gas Reserves and Definitions Forward Looking Statements In the interest of providing readers with information regarding Mountainview Energy Ltd. ("Mountainview"), including management's assessment of the future plans and operations of Mountainview

  3. Slide 3: Reader Advisory: United States Legal Disclaimer

    Reader Advisory United States Legal Disclaimer Mountainview Energy Ltd. (the “Company”) is proposing to sell its securities (the “Securities”) in the United States on a private placement basis, pursuant to an exemption from the registration requirements of the United States Securities Act of 1933, a

  4. Slide 4: Corporate Overview: Summary Statistics and Quick Facts

    Corporate Overview Summary Statistics and Quick Facts Mountainview Energy, LTD Quick Facts PROJECT LOCATIONS Listing TSX-V "MVW.V" Corporate domicile Alberta, Canada Headquarters Cut Bank, MT US Subsidiaries • Mountainview, Inc. • Mountain Divide, LLC Shares outstanding 87.8 MM Fully diluted shares

  5. Slide 5: Corporate Overview: Strategy

    Corporate Overview Strategy  Focus on execution and expansion of the Three Forks 12 Gage drilling program, located in the Williston Basin: • Continue the development drilling plan on existing core acreage position in Divide County, ND • Increase the acreage position • Reduce costs and improve produ

  6. Slide 6: 2015 Capital Budget and Priorities

    Corporate Overview 2015 Capital Budget 2015 Priorities • Hold acreage and expand footprint in core of the 12 Gage Project area • Evaluate potential Acquisition opportunities • Improve Balance Sheet • Grow production and proven reserves • Implement operational efficiencies & reduce well costs 6 Confi

  7. Slide 7: Gage Project Map and Summary

    Mountain Divide (fully owned subsidiary)’s 12 Gage Project 12 Gage Project Map and Summary Canada Montana Divide County, ND American Eagle SM Energy ~15,000 Net Acres with room for 30% CORE AREA: Acreage Growth • 9 Operated PDP (Producers) • ~45 Operated PUDS 12 GAGE PROJECT • ~15 Operated PRBS • Cu

  8. Slide 8: Project Area Overview: Three Forks Structure

    Project Area Overview Three Forks Structure 8 Confidential

  9. Slide 9: North–South Cross Section and Increasing Oil Saturation

    Project Area Overview North – South Cross Section and Increasing Oil Saturation 12 Gage Secondary Target: Middle Bakken 12 Gage Primary Target: Upper Three Forks (Torquay) 12 Gage Secondary Target: 12 Gage Geology: Lower Three Forks Bakken / Three Forks System: 9 Confidential

  10. Slide 10: Gage Project Area Activity by Operator

    Project Area Overview 12 Gage Project Area Activity – 30 Day IP—BOPD (High Month) By Operator • The Bakken/Three Forks Area of Review: 29 Three Forks Wells is comparatively shallow Drilled in the last 3 years…18 in the last 12 in Divide County months. T163N – 161N, R100 – 102W • Well costs are lower

  11. Slide 11: Mountain Divide Operated Three Forks Wells' IP Rates

    Mountain Divide 12 Gage Production Mountain Divide Operated Three Forks Wells’ IP Rates 600 MOUNTAIN DIVIDE 2013-14 THREE FORKS WELLS 30 Day IP 6% Increase over previous best well in less favorable 60 Day IP geology. 500 400 Average Daily Rate (BOEPD) IP'd on Rotoflex Pump 300 200 100 0 Wigness 5 Le

  12. Slide 12: Drilling and Completion: Spud to First Production

    Drilling and Completion 10 Operated Wells Drilled with Average Time to TD of 19 Days Spud to First Production, Mountain Divide Wells Well Spud Date First Prod Date Days Wigness 5-8-1H 11/14/2012 2/23/2013 101 Leininger 3-10-1H 12/12/2012 3/14/2013 92 Olson 35-26-1H 1/5/2013 4/11/2013 96 Heckman 7-6-

  13. Slide 13: Drilling and Completion: Capital Cost Review

    Drilling and Completion Capital Cost Review Drilling & Completion Costs Well SPUD Drilling ($M) Frac / Cleanout Facility/Location Total Initial 3 Wells (Wigness, Leininger, Olson 35): Avg D&C Cost = $8.5MM Heckman 7-6-1H 7/6/2013 2,298 3,355 1,149 6,802 Olson 2-11S-1H 8/8/2013 1,866 3,434 1,221 6,52

  14. Slide 14: Capital Cost Improvements

    Drilling and Completion Capital Cost Improvements Cost Reduction and Efficiency Initiatives Average Description Cost Reduction Cost Drilling Cost: $1,907M Reduce by 5% (cut 1 day to 18 days) through best practices and -$100M --$1,807 maintaining continuity on the Drilling Team. Frac Cost (Cleanout)

  15. Slide 15: Lease Operating Expense Assumptions and Sensitivity

    Production Operations Lease Operating Expense Assumptions and Sensitivity Lease Operating Expense Assumptions and Type Well Economics LOE, $/mo. LOE, $/mo. LOE, $/mo. SWD, Total Yr. 1 Total Yr. 2 1 to 6 mos. 6 to 18 mos. 18 mos. - ECL $/BBL. H2O IRR (%) LOE, $/BO LOE, $/BO High LOE scenario 28,000 1

  16. Slide 16: Mountain Divide Q1 & Q2 2015

    Mountain Divide Q1 & Q2 2015 BJNJ Well Pad • Monitor (BJNJ 30-31-1H) Production • Complete BJNJ 19-18N-1H & Aaberg Aaberg Well Pad 8-5N-1H Pending Service Availability • SWD gathering in ‘core area’— reduces SWD cost by 50% • Electrify the BJNJ well pad Well Names Spud Date Completion Date Mountainv

  17. Slide 17: BJNJ 30-31-1H Production

    BJNJ 30-31-1H Production BJNJ 30-31-1H Well Results • BJNJ is company’s best performing well in first 30 days • 1 day IP - 700 boe/d (639 bopd, 368 mcf/d) • 7 day IP - 623 boe/d (553 bopd, 420 mcf/d) • 30 day IP - 568 boe/d (506 bopd, 372 mcf/d) • Results represent a 29% increase in the 30 day IP co

  18. Slide 18: BJNJ 30-31-1H Production

    BJNJ 30-31-1H Production BJNJ 30-31-1H Well Results 18 Confidential

  19. Slide 19: Legacy Assets: Northwest Montana Production

    Legacy Assets Northwest Montana Production  Red Creek -2,500 gross/net acres, operator  100% WI  91% NRI Red Creek Field 90 boe/d  Evaluating AB Bakken potential  Current Production: 90 boe/d  35 producing wells (Madison, Lower Cut Bank Sandstone, Upper Cut Bank Sandstone) Williams Gas Field &

  20. Slide 20: Risk Mitigation

    Risk Mitigation Significant growth potential while protecting value • Eleven successful wells drilled, with nine successful producers across the existing acreage position, generating a further 69 well-defined infill development drilling locations for the Three Forks formation with 80 additional up-h

  21. Slide 21: Appendices

    Appendices 21 Confidential

  22. Slide 22: Management and Organization

    Management and Organization Board and Management Profiles Patrick M. Montalban – President, CEO and Director: Mr. Montalban has been active in the oil and gas exploration and production industry for over 30 years, starting his career as a roughneck in 1977. Since then, he has served in leadership po

  23. Slide 23: Project Area Economics

    Project Area Economics Mountain Divide Operated Wells 23 Confidential

  24. Slide 24: Cemented Liners and High Proppant Intensity Fracs

    Drilling and Completion Cemented Liners and High Proppant Intensity Fracs EOG Frac Technique Case Study Mountrail, ND Roosevelt, MT NE Elm Coulee Clearwater Field Roosevelt, MT High NE Elm Coulee EUR Month STA FLUID Well Operator (MBOE) (BOPD) GES (BBLS) #'s Prop Notes Diamond 2- Estimated based on

  25. Slide 25: Completion (Frac Stimulation)

    Drilling and Completion Completion (Frac Stimulation) Historical & Summary of Offset Operator Fracs EUR High Month Prod LATERAL LENGTH Well Operator (MBOE) (BOPD) Months WC (ft) STAGES FLUID (BBLS) #'s Prop Notes Mount. Used plug & perf, but modelled after Wigness 5-8-1H Divide 312 268 14 78 9924 26

  26. Slide 26: Consistent Three Forks Stratigraphy from East to West

    Project Area Overview Consistent Three Forks Stratigraphy from East to West 26 Confidential

  27. Slide 27: North–South Cross Section and Increasing Oil Saturation

    Project Area Overview North – South Cross Section and Increasing Oil Saturation 27 Confidential

  28. Slide 28: Supplemental Financial Information: Hedge Position

    Supplemental Financial Information Hedge Position Month Barrels  On December 19, 2013, the Company engaged in an eighteen month Jan-14 11,000 Hedging Agreement with Wells Fargo Feb-14 11,000 Mar-14 11,000  The agreement has a collar with a floor at $85.00 and a ceiling at $97.70 Apr-14 9,000 May-1

  29. Slide 29: Running Room (Potential Future Projects)

    Running Room (Potential Future Projects) Colossus Red River / Three Forks / Lodgepole Project: Prolific – 135,000 net acres Dawson, Richland & Wibaux Counties, MT Golden Valley, ND Whiting, Interstate, and Petro-Hunt Active ~30 Recent Red River wells drilled in the Project Area— 100 – 2,000 MBO

Mountainview Energy — Investor Presentation (May 2015) on 6ix