Aurora UK Alpha plc · LSE:ARR

Aurora UK Alpha — Aurora Investment Trust — Shareholder Meeting (July 2016)

71 slides from Aurora UK Alpha's shareholder meeting presentation, Jul 13, 2016

  1. Slide 1: Aurora Investment Trust plc AGM July 13th 2016

    Aurora Investment Trust plc AGM July 13th 2016 Phoenix Asset Management Partners Limited

  2. Slide 2: Phoenix – The Team

    Phoenix — The Team Gary Channon (1998) Founder, Chief Investment Officer

  3. Slide 3: Phoenix – The Team

    Phoenix — The Team Gary Channon (1998) Founder, Chief Investment Officer Charlotte Maby (2000) Deputy Portfolio Manager, MD

  4. Slide 4: Phoenix – The Old Lags

    Phoenix — The Old Lags Gary Channon (1998) Founder, Chief Investment Officer Charlotte Maby (2000) Deputy Portfolio Manager, MD Tristan Chapple (2001) Research Analyst, Director mm 6 Steve Tatters \ (2004) Business Development, Director

  5. Slide 5: Phoenix – Research (+ Steve)

    Phoenix — Research (+ Steve) Gary Channon (1998) Founder, Chief Investment Officer James Wilson Charlotte Maby Tristan Chapple (2013) opotioh easel Research Manager, MD Analyst, Director INGEN Diana Tan (2014) Research Analyst Freddie Martin (2016) Research Analyst Steve Tatters s] (2004) Business D

  6. Slide 6: Phoenix – The Entire Team

    Phoenix — The Entire Team a) Gary Channon (1998) Founder, Roger Canham Chief (2009) Investment : Officer Chairman Charlotte Maby are James Wilson My Steve Tatters (2000) Deputy Rosearch (2013) He) (2004) Business Portfolio Analyst, Research Development, Manager, MD Dian Analyst Director Diana Tan Fr

  7. Slide 7: Phoenix – A Barnes based business

    Phoenix – A Barnes based business

  8. Slide 8: Phoenix & Aurora Timeline

    Phoenix & Aurora Timeline — First considered an Investment Trust in 2013.

  9. Slide 9: Aurora Timeline

    Aurora Timeline — First considered an Investment Trust in 2013 — Approached the Aurora Board in September 2015

  10. Slide 10: Aurora Timeline

    Aurora Timeline — First considered an Investment Trust in 2013 — Approached the Aurora Board in September 2015 — Investment Manager since January 2016 10

  11. Slide 11: Aurora Timeline

    Aurora Timeline aS — First considered an Investment Trust in 2013 — Approached the Aurora Board in September 2015 — Formal appointment as Investment Manager in January 2016 — Trust was £15m in January 2016 11

  12. Slide 12: Aurora Timeline

    Aurora Timeline aS — First considered an Investment Trust in 2013 — Approached the Aurora Board in September 2015 — Formal appointment as Investment Manager in January 2016 — Trust was £15m in January 2016 — Raised £14m of new money 12

  13. Slide 13: Aurora Timeline

    Aurora Timeline aS — First considered an Investment Trust in 2013 — Approached the Aurora Board in September 2015 — Formal appointment as Investment Manager in January 2016 — Trust was £15m in January 2016 — Raised £14m of new money — Net Assets currently £80m 13

  14. Slide 14: Aurora NAV vs Share Price Since January 2016

    Aurora NAV vs Share Price Since January 2016

  15. Slide 15: Performance Attribution

    Performance Attribution aS 2016 (30 June) Investment Return -4.7% 1.0% 0.5% l 0.0% U | | é cS 0.5% Ss 1.0% 1.5% 2.0% 2.5% -3.0% 3.5% 15

  16. Slide 16: Portfolio Comparison – January 29th vs July 8th

    Portfolio Comparison – January 29th vs July 8th

  17. Slide 17: Aurora: Unique Fee Structure

    Aurora: Unique Fee Structure

  18. Slide 18: What To Expect

    What To Expect Ss — A bumpy ride: a concentrated portfolio of out of favour stocks can be volatile — Occasional big drawdowns: times of crisis are often our best windows of opportunity — Big bounce backs — if we get our research right we have nothing to fear from volatility — Excellent long term ret

  19. Slide 19: Appendices

    y) Ale ww v Appendices

  20. Slide 20: What Makes A Great Investment?

    What Makes A Great Investment?

  21. Slide 21: Managers We Back

    Managers We Back — They must be honest — Aligned — financially and emotionally — Competent not necessarily outstanding — Have a track record of the above — Use fair or conservative accounting 21

  22. Slide 22: What We Pay

    Ze> What We Pay ed — Inadownside scenario, at a minimum, we want our money back — Inanormal scenario, we look for 15% per annum return — We model cash — We give no benefit to leverage — We won't buy stocks with a risk of ruin — We calculate an intrinsic value for the stock and our maximum entry pric

  23. Slide 23: Key Differentiating Factor

    Key Differentiating Factor The depth and detail of our research and the ongoing monitoring of businesses we own

  24. Slide 24: Our Research Process

    Our Research Process Ss — We operate in areas where we have acquired a lot of historical background knowledge — Thorough and detailed — Library, internet, fieldwork — We study competitors and look for winners — Business...Management....Price (AAA) — DREAM — We need to be able to monitor independentl

  25. Slide 25: Research Process

    Research Process • • • • • • • • • • • • •

  26. Slide 26: How We Build Our Portfolio

    How We Build Our Portfolio Ss — AA candidate becomes AAA because of price move — Risk screen checklist before allocation of an initial weight limit — Concentrated (12 — 20 stocks) but not correlated — Constrain by cost price weight, 15% max — Weighted according to downside, upside, confidence and li

  27. Slide 27: Risk Philosophy

    Risk Philosophy — Phoenix definition: Potential for Permanent Capital Loss — We have alow risk approach — we seek to avoid permanent capital loss — We do not view volatility as risk: we base our analysis and decisions on real world values, accept that stock prices will fluctuate in the short term ba

  28. Slide 28: Phoenix UK Fund - Performance

    Phoenix UK Fund - Performance

  29. Slide 29: Winners & Losers – Phoenix UK Fund

    Winners & Losers – Phoenix UK Fund

  30. Slide 30: By Size of Company

    By Size of Company mSmall & Mid Big 30

  31. Slide 31: Win:Loss in Big Cap / Small & Mid Cap Stocks

    Win:Loss in Big Cap / Small & Mid Cap Stocks

  32. Slide 32: FTSE 100 During Phoenix's Life

    FTSE 100 During Phoenix’s Life

  33. Slide 33: By Market Condition When Purchased

    By Market Condition When Purchased

  34. Slide 34: Win:Loss in Bull / Bear Market Purchases

    Win:Loss in Bull / Bear Market Purchases

  35. Slide 35: Cyclical vs. Non-Cyclical

    Cyclical vs. Non-Cyclical m Cyclical @ Non-Cyclical 35

  36. Slide 36: Performance in Non-Cyclicals / Cyclicals

    Performance in Non-Cyclicals / Cyclicals

  37. Slide 37: Different Types of Cyclicality

    Different Types of Cyclicality 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non-Cyclical Cyclical A

  38. Slide 38: Different Types of Cyclicality

    Different Types of Cyclicality 180 160 140 120 100 80 60 40 20 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Non-Cyclical Cyclical A Cyclical B

  39. Slide 39: Phoenix UK Fund (Gross) vs. FTSE All-Share

    Phoenix UK Fund (Gross) vs. FTSE All-Share PUK (Gross) FTSE-All Share Index* 11.5%

  40. Slide 40: Fundamental Portfolio Characteristics

    Fundamental Portfolio Characteristics

  41. Slide 41: Phoenix UK Fund NAV versus Intrinsic Value Estimate since Inception

    Phoenix UK Fund NAV versus Intrinsic Value Estimate since Inception (£/share)

  42. Slide 42: Research Process - Overview

    Research Process - Overview Ss — The Fund Manager and Analysts use a variety of sources to generate ideas including wide reading and thinking, discussion and many other methods of research including fieldwork and meeting companies — _ Research is all primary and as much as we can involves interactin

  43. Slide 43: Portfolio Management Process: Ongoing Weight Decisions

    Portfolio Management Process: Ongoing Weight Decisions

  44. Slide 44: Appendix III: Running Winners…Lessons From The Past

    Appendix III : Running Winners…Lessons From The Past

  45. Slide 45: Appendix IV: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Appendix IV: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  46. Slide 46: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  47. Slide 47: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  48. Slide 48: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  49. Slide 49: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  50. Slide 50: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  51. Slide 51: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  52. Slide 52: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  53. Slide 53: Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

    Anatomy of a Typical Phoenix Investment

  54. Slide 54: Current Portfolio by Phase Position – June 2016

    Current Portfolio by Phase Position – 30 June 2016

  55. Slide 55: Appendix II: London Value Investor Conference April 2012

    Appendix II: London Value Investor Conference April 2012

  56. Slide 56: EBIT (2007 – 2012)

    EBIT (2007 — 2012) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 56

  57. Slide 57: Net Profit (2007 – 2012)

    Net Profit (2007 — 2012) 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 59

  58. Slide 58: EBIT Using Current Cost Accounting

    EBIT Using Current Cost Accounting

  59. Slide 59: EBIT: Historic versus Current Cost

    EBIT: Historic versus Current Cost

  60. Slide 60: Profit per Plot – Current Cost Accounting

    Profit per Plot – Current Cost Accounting

  61. Slide 61: The UK Housebuilding Business Model

    The UK Housebuilding Business Model Returns Capital £k £k Sale price 200 Work-In-Progress 90 Land 47 23.5% Landbank 165 Build & Sell 110 55.0% Trade Creditors 90 Costs 157 165 Site Profit 43 21.5% Overhead 9 4.6% EBIT 34 16.9% Profit After Tax 26 Return on Capital 16%

  62. Slide 62: English House Prices vs. Land Price (Peak=100)

    English House Prices vs. Land Price (Peak=100)

  63. Slide 63: How Has The Pub Industry Performed

    How Has The Pub Industry Performed

  64. Slide 64: Where Do People Want To Drink Their Alcohol?

    Where Do People Want To Drink Their Alcohol?

  65. Slide 65: How Have J.D. Wetherspoon Performed?

    How Have J.D. Wetherspoon Performed?

  66. Slide 66: Cash Return On Capital Is The True Measure Of Success

    Cash Return On Capital Is The True Measure Of Success

  67. Slide 67: Sports Direct

    Sports Direct 3,000 2,500 2,000 1,500 1,000 50 io) io) Sales £m 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015 67

  68. Slide 68: Sports Direct ROCC (2005 – 2015)

    Sports Direct ROCC (2005 – 2015) 900 70% Core Capital £m ROCC £m ROCC% 800 60% 700 50% 600 500 40% 400 30% 300 20% 200 10% 100 0 0% 2005 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015

  69. Slide 69: Consistent margins through the cycle

    Consistent margins through the cycle

  70. Slide 70: SPD consistently beats its competitors

    SPD consistently beats its competitors •

  71. Slide 71: Regulatory notice

    Regulatory notice ee> Aurora Investment Trust Plc (“the Trust”) is a UK investment trust listed on the London Stock Exchange. Past performance is no guarantee of future performance. The value of investments and any income from them may go down as well as up and investors may not get back the amount

Aurora Investment Trust — Shareholder Meeting (July 2016) on 6ix