Marker Therapeutics, Inc. · NASDAQ:MRKR

Marker Therapeutics — Technical Presentation (July 2019)

32 slides from Marker Therapeutics's technical presentation, Jul 22, 2019

  1. Slide 1: Phase I/II Trial in Pancreatic Adenocarcinoma (TACTOPS)

    PHASE I/II TRIAL IN PANCREATIC ADENOCARCINOMA (TACTOPS) July 22°¢2019 > MARKER

  2. Slide 2: Forward Looking Statement

    ——————_—— FORWARD LOOKING STATEMENT Certain statements contained herein are forward-looking statements within the meaning of Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended, and Section 27A of the Securities Act of 1933, as amended, that involve risks and uncertainties. All statements

  3. Slide 3: Peter Hoang, President & Chief Executive Officer

    Peter Hoang President & Chief Executive Officer

  4. Slide 4: Survival Rates Have Not Been Meaningfully Improved in the Last 40 Years

    SURVIVAL RATES HAVE NOT BEEN MEANINGFULLY IMPROVED IN THE LAST 40 YEARS Trends in 5-year relative survival rates, US, 1975-2013

  5. Slide 5: Pancreatic Cancer Remains Deadly at Every Stage

    ———_o PANCREATIC CANCER REMAINS DEADLY AT EVERY STAGE... Five-year relative survival rates by stage at diagnosis, US, 2007-2013 Allstages Local Regional _ Distant Allstages Local Regional Distant. (Gecas Temata 30 3 co B_ Ora cavity & pharynx 6 84 64 39 (oon recur a 30 7 1a) ovary a 3 B 2» Colon 64

  6. Slide 6: While Mortality Rate Remains Stagnant

    ——————_— «WHILE MORTALITY RATE REMAINS STAGNANT Trends in Age-adjusted Cancer Death Rates, Trends in Age-agjstes Cancer Death Rates, Males, U3, 50'2018 Females! OS 980.2546 109 109 2 g al t Lung & bronchus 2 Eco y & Lung & bronchus 2 stomacn Prostate © | sicmei Colon & rect Z,, ‘Colon & rectum Eales

  7. Slide 7: Brandon G. Smaglo M.D., FACP, Lead Investigator

    Brandon G. Smaglo M.D., FACP Lead investigator and Assistant Professor of Oncology at Baylor College of Medicine

  8. Slide 8: Pancreatic Cancer: Therapy Remains Chemotherapy

    ——————_— PANCREATIC CANCER: THERAPY REMAINS CHEMOTHERAPY « Combination chemotherapy © Adjuvant: FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/capecitabine © Palliative: FOLFIRINOX or gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel ° Side effects ©° Cumulative: fatigue, neuropathy, cytopenias © Repetitive: nausea, vomiting, diarrhea ° Distr

  9. Slide 9: First Line Therapy: ACCORD-11 FOLFIRINOX

    FIRST LINE THERAPY ACCORD-I!: FOLFIRINOX GENERATES LONGEST OVERALL SURVIVAL BUT IS HIGHLY TOXIC ¢ All patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer @ FOLFIRINOX vs. gemcitabine A. Overall Survival *¢ FOLFIRINOX option for first line we BeO001 by sated logsrank test * Median OS 11.1 months (vs. 6.8m). a

  10. Slide 10: First Line Therapy: MPACT Gem-Abraxane

    FIRST LINE THERAPY MPACT: GEM-ABRAXANE GENERATES SHORTER OVERALL SURVIVAL BUT IS BETTER TOLERATED ¢ All patients with metastatic pancreatic cancer * Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel vs. gemcitabine * Gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel option for first line lessees * Median OS 8.5 months . Events/n (95% C1)_Percen

  11. Slide 11: Phase I/II Pancreatic Trial (TACTOPS): Arm Study

    ——————_—— PHASE I/II PANCREATIC TRIAL (TACTOPS): 3 ARM STUDY ARM CANCER STATUS. Advanced Advanced Borderline Resectable ENROLLMENT CRITERIA Responding (SD or PR) to initial chemotherapy Failure of or intolerance to initial chemotherapy Effective neoadjuvant ‘therapy MULTITAA T CELLS ‘Administered in

  12. Slide 12: Arm A: T Cells as First Line Therapy + SOC Chemotherapy

    FIRST LINE THERAPY ARM A: T CELLS AS FIRST LINE THERAPY + SOC CHEMOTHERAPY Continued same 1* line Three months of chemotherapy ae line Observe to chemotherapy 2 progression regimen Monthly T cells up to 6x * This arm was designed to evaluate the safety and potential efficacy of using MultiTAA cells

  13. Slide 13: Pancreatic Phase I Trial (TACTOPS) Arm A Highlights

    FIRST LINE THERAPY PANCREATIC PHASE I TRIAL (TACTOPS) ARM A HIGHLIGHTS ° 10 patients: 9 evaluable, 1 too early 3 confirmed objective responses (OR), out of 9 evaluable patients: 1 complete response (CR) and 2 partial responses (PR) after receiving MultiTAA cells 4 stable disease (SD): Notably, 2 pat

  14. Slide 14: Arm A: Summary of Best Overall Response (RECIST)

    Se ARM A: SUMMARY OF BEST OVERALL RESPONSE (RECIST) Patient e ‘Chemotherapy Given ‘gemcitabine/nab-paciitaxel FOLFIRINOX FOLFIRINOX FOLFIRINOX ‘gemcitabine/nab-paciitaxel gemeitabine/nab-pacitaxel FOLFIRINOX ‘gemeitabine/nab-paciitaxel FOLFIRINOX Best RECIST response on T cell Therapy Partial respon

  15. Slide 15: Clinical Response: Patient #1 - Partial Response

    CLINICAL RESPONSE: PATIENT #1* - PARTIAL RESPONSE Pre-Treatment After T Cell Treatment (2m) >50% reduction of index lesion Targeted antigens 150 3 100 Shvesot é sracesas § so mss Sorane ° Baseline Cotter chemo sone) Peak post Non-targeted antigens B 180 awn 2 100 Marr a MAGE! S50 MMAGE-AS § MAGE26 M

  16. Slide 16: Clinical Response: Patient #3 - Partial Response

    CLINICAL RESPONSE: PATIENT #3 - PARTIAL RESPONSE Pre-Treatment After T Cell Treatment (6m) >40% reduction of index lesion Targeted antigens 4 0 @ Patient had a significant population % 90, survivin, of PRAME-specific cells at baseline, & 60 sNx&01 which may reflect tumor volume g athe decrease prior

  17. Slide 17: Clinical Response: Patient #7 - Complete Response

    CLINICAL RESPONSE: PATIENT #7 - COMPLETE RESPONSE Pre-Treatment Targeted antigens Peak post survivin enveson MMAGE-Ad S82 Baseline Cotter eneme alone) Non-targeted antigens sMAgE-CL THage-as MAGE-28 IMAGEA il Baseline (otter creme atone) Peak post Prior to infusion, patient had virtually no detectab

  18. Slide 18: Summary of Aggregate Measurable Tumor: Arm A Patients

    SUMMARY OF AGGREGATE MEASURABLE TUMOR ARM A PATIENTS Cchemo-onty ‘chemo + MultiTAA cols leasurement represents sum of all lesions Prior patient experience Unusual findings eh 7

  19. Slide 19: Pancreatic Clinical Trial Outcomes: Arm A

    SS PANCREATIC CLINICAL TRIAL OUTCOMES Arm A: T cells + effective chemotherapy 1D Chemotherapy Given Median PES Median O8 me >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> >t) i nm comes 3 FOLFIRINOX 2)22>22)2)2)222223229222222222292222222 m0) 4 FoLrinNox PPDDDDDPDIDPDIIPPIIIDPIIIPDIIPPDIID 50.03m0) 7 FOLFIRINOX —-PIDPDDDDDD

  20. Slide 20: Arm B: T Cells as Second Line Therapy

    SECOND LINE THERAPY ARM B: T CELLS AS SECOND LINE THERAPY Three months of 1 line Monthly T cells up to Observe to chemotherapy 6x progression regimen e Arm B explores the use of MultiTAA cells as a second line therapy for patients who fail first line chemotherapy: ° Patients progressing after chemot

  21. Slide 21: Pancreatic Phase I/II Trial (TACTOPS) Arm B Highlights

    PANCREATIC PHASE I/II TRIAL (TACTOPS) ARM B HIGHLIGHTS e 6 patients treated and evaluable * 3 out of 6 patients achieved clinical disease stabilization, which can be considered medically significant in this setting © Results in this setting generally have a median overall survival of approximately 3

  22. Slide 22: Arm B: Summary of Best Overall Response (RECIST)

    — Se ARM B: SUMMARY OF BEST OVERALL RESPONSE (RECIST) Patient Best RECIST response on T coll therapy Progression of disease Stable disease (Not assessed) (Not assessed) Progression of disease Progression of disease Best clinical assessment Clinically stable Clinically well; off of any therapy Clinic

  23. Slide 23: TACTOPS Tumor Measurement: Arm B Patients

    TACTOPS TUMORI MEASUREMENT: ARM B PATIENTS MultTAA cals ony : al “tumor Sige Cem) 3 ree Asean Tatil Co agmniaton Tes Resssent ‘Secon Roemer ‘netemotheney Goran “Measurement represents sum of al lesions . + Patient 3 progressed before tumor measurements could be taken

  24. Slide 24: Clinical Response: Patient #2 - Stable Disease

    CLINICAL RESPONSE: PATIENT #2 - STABLE DISEASE Pre-Treatment = = After T Cell Treatment (6m) sFc/2xi08 Targeted antigens sURVIVIN, aNv-EsO-1 AMAGEAS mssx2 = PRAME Baseline Peak post Non-targeted antigens Baseline Peak post BMAGe26 SMAGEA Patient had a significant expansion of T cells specific to tar

  25. Slide 25: Pancreatic Clinical Trial Outcomes: Arm B

    So PANCREATIC CLINICAL TRIAL OUTCOMES Arm B: T cells as second line therapy 10 Reason for Enrolment Gf of oe Ao ec ae >>> >> >>> 9 70 came) 2 Progression on chemo) PPPPPVDPPPDPDDPPDWD som 3 rosresion on chomone GAY IDL os 4. chemotherapy ntterance BPD es g 5 chemotherapy intolerance GA) PPP haar ae

  26. Slide 26: Arm C: Surgical Adjuvant Therapy

    ARM C: SURGICAL ADJUVANT THERAPY Neoadjuvant Adjuvant Therapy Therapy ‘ + E> ae > E Up to give five One preoperative additional T cell T cell infusion infusions e Patients with surgically resectable disease are eligible for Arm C © One dose of MultiTAA cells prior to surgery o Resected tumor is anal

  27. Slide 27: Clinical Response: T Cell Infiltration, Expansion and Epitope Spreading

    CLINICAL RESPONSE: T CELL INFILTRATION, EXPANSION AND EPITOPE SPREADING Targeted antigens 600. 4, 500: suRviIN 400: =NY-ESO- § 300. RMAGE-AG § 200. msse2 100: sm PRAME of Baseline Peak post Non-targeted antigens Baseline Peak post © Low baseline T cell count prior to infusion © Post infusion, MultiT

  28. Slide 28: Pancreatic Clinical Trial Outcomes: Arm C

    C—O PANCREATIC CLINICAL TRIAL OUTCOMES Arm C: Surgical adjuvant therapy i >>> >>> >> >> >>> >>> > J 50 comoy >>> >>> >> >> > > 9 0 camo 3 DPDDIDIIIIIII>> 80 csmoy S =

  29. Slide 29: Question and Answer Session

  30. Slide 30: Appendix

  31. Slide 31: Profile of MultiTAA-T Cells

    LL PROFILE OF MULTITAA-T CELLS 120 100 50% § 80 40% Do 8 2 8 60 3 x 2 g ; 24 © 0% 3 10% 5 om i cos om” coe SS Gos” tan tn ie, Be. as porters era Phenotype Safety

  32. Slide 32: MultiTAA T Cell Specificity

    MULTITAA T CELL SPECIFICITY sFc/2n108 160 140 120 100 Specificity Targeted antigens onto! 1m No pepmix im SURVIVIN mNY-Esoa mi MAGE-Aa mi ssxz i PRAME

Marker Therapeutics — Technical Presentation (July 2019) on 6ix