Outokumpu Oyj · OMXHEX:OUT1V

Outokumpu Oyj — AvestaPolarit — Corporate Update (August 2001)

14 slides from Outokumpu Oyj's corporate update, Aug 28, 2001

  1. Slide 1: Plan for restructuring AvestaPolarit melting activities

    Plan for restructuring AvestaPolarit melting activities 28 August 2001

  2. Slide 2: Background to restructuring decision

    Background to restructuring decision  Overall objective of merger between Avesta Sheffield and Outokumpu Steel in January 2001:  To secure a significant and sustained increase in value for AvestaPolarit’s shareholders  by creating an independent, world-class, focused, profitable and growth-orient

  3. Slide 3: Strategy for value creation

    Strategy for value creation  Key drivers in creating value were at the time of the merger identified to include:  An effective combination of the two companies and their complementary strengths to exploit economies of scale in production, sales and distribution, R&D, purchasing and administration.

  4. Slide 4: Preparations for Board decision on melting shop restructuring

    Preparations for Board decision on melting shop restructuring  A full, detailed strategic plan for the Group was prepared during the spring months 2001.  It included a thorough analysis of melting capacity requirements and restructuring alternatives.  Plan discussed by the Board at several meetin

  5. Slide 5: Board decision August 22, 2001

    Board decision August 22, 2001  Restructure to improve overall cost efficiency of the Group’s melting activities.  Establish strong platform for further development of Long Products.  Plan for phased closure of Degerfors Stainless melting and billet rolling activities by mid-2003.  Initiate nego

  6. Slide 6: Key issues and rationale

    Key issues and rationale  AvestaPolarit today operates four steel melting shops  Tornio 650 to 1650 kton/a Avesta 600 kton/a Sheffield 600 kton/a Degerfors 230 kton/a  Ongoing major expansion at Tornio gives excess melting capacity from 2003 onwards.  Need to rationalise the Group’s melting shop

  7. Slide 7: Thorough analysis of options

    Thorough analysis of options  Thorough analysis of melting shop restructuring options, performed in connection with the review of overall Group strategy, covered projected development of total melting capacity and demand up to 2010.  Three alternatives studied  1: Closure of Degerfors  2: Closur

  8. Slide 8: Clear outcome of the analysis

    Clear outcome of the analysis  The alternative to close Return on investment of Degerfors is the best the three alternatives option. IRR, %  Best financial return 35  Lowest production costs 30  Good base for further growth 25  If SMACC would be closed, 20 larger investments in new melting capa

  9. Slide 9: Improved overall profitability

    Improved overall profitability  The Degerfors melting shop closure simplifies the Group structure  Tornio and Avesta are the principal melting shops in the coil system – the Group’s core business.  The main role of SMACC will be to feed Long Products and Hot Rolled Plate (HRP), with minor volume

  10. Slide 10: Long Products able to establish a strong platform for further development

    Long Products able to establish a strong platform for further development  Success in the long products market is becoming increasingly dependent on access to competitive feedstock. Economies of scale at SMACC can secure world-class cost-efficiency for billet production.  Improved cost base will b

  11. Slide 11: Current profitability of Degerfors Stainless not indicative of sustainable performance

    Current profitability of Degerfors Stainless not indicative of sustainable performance  Financials by individual business units within AvestaPolarit are not reported in public  Not calculated on comparable or true commercial terms  Degerfors Stainless past performance records dependent on numerou

  12. Slide 12: Implications at Degerfors site

    Implications at Degerfors site - Slide 1  Closure of the Degerfors Stainless operations planned to be concluded by mid-2003.  Degerfors will continue to be the base for the Group’s Hot Rolled Plate business unit.  It will continue to develop its business to maintain its position as the world’s le

  13. Slide 13: Implications at Degerfors site

    Implications at Degerfors site - Slide 2  Closure plan for Degerfors Stainless operations will result in a loss of 330 jobs out of a current 700 at the site.  Personnel at both Degerfors Stainless and Hot Rolled Plate business units are affected by the closure, due to the shared-site operations. 

  14. Slide 14: Onward process at Degerfors

    Onward process at Degerfors  Important to handle closure responsibly and in good cooperation with local authorities.  Objective must be to make period of continuing uncertainty about consequences on both individual employee and broader community level as short as possible.  Prompt MBL-negotiation

AvestaPolarit — Corporate Update (August 2001) on 6ix