Solana Company · NASDAQ:HSDT

Solana — Helius Medical Technologies — Investor Presentation (November 2017)

34 slides from Solana's investor presentation, Nov 9, 2017

  1. Slide 1: A Revolution in Mind

    A Revolution in Mind November 9, 2017 www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT

  2. Slide 2: Legal Disclaimers

    Legal Disclaimers This presentation includes certain statements that may constitute “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of the U.S. Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Canadian securities laws. All statements contained in this presentation, other than statements of histo

  3. Slide 3: Traumatic Brain Injury

    30,000/year active duty soldiers with TBI 200,000 retired soldiers diagnosed with TBI 20-30% of new cases result in chronic symptoms Traumatic Brain Injury Military Athletic / Civilian Common Types of TBI due to Military Activity: Explosive blast injury Penetrating injury Diffuse axonal injury Large

  4. Slide 4: PoNS Designed to Stimulate the Trigeminal and Facial Nerves Through the Tongue

    PoNSTM Designed to Stimulate the Trigeminal and Facial Nerves Through the Tongue www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT

  5. Slide 5: Neuroprotective Effects of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation in Severe TBI

    Neuroprotective Effects of Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation in Severe Traumatic Brain Injury Nature Scientific Reports, Chiluwal A, Narayan R, Chung W et al. July 28, 2017 “These data provide strong early evidence that activation of the trigeminal nerve system affords neuroprotection following brain dam

  6. Slide 6: What is the Sensory Organization Test (SOT)

    What is the Sensory Organization Test (SOT) The Sensory Organization Test (SOT): Uses computerized posturography to quantify a patient’s use of sensory input: vision, vestibular and somatosensory cues to maintain postural stability The SOT utilizes six “conditions” to interpret a patient’s degree of

  7. Slide 7: Effect of Physical Therapy Alone in Treatment of Balance Disorder in TBI

    Effect of Physical Therapy Alone in Treatment of Balance Disorder in TBI Dr. Deborah Backus, PhD Director of MS Research at the Shepherd Center and President of the American Congress of Rehabilitation Medicine has more than 30 years of experience in neurological rehabilitation and research says: “Mo

  8. Slide 8: Neuromodulation, Neuroplasticity and Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation

    Neuromodulation, Neuroplasticity and Trigeminal Nerve Stimulation Neuromodulation is the application of external stimuli to provoke changes in brain activity It occurs through two mechanisms: acute changes to how existing synapses work, and chronically by the creation of new synapses The trigeminal

  9. Slide 9: Regulatory Science vs Clinical Science

    Regulatory Science vs Clinical Science Regulatory science is done to satisfy the need for regulatory authorities to determine the safety and efficacy of an intervention (Drug or medical device) Regulatory submissions require reliable data from randomized, controlled multicenter studies as standard f

  10. Slide 10: Independent Controlled Clinical Trials to Date

    Independent Controlled Clinical Trials to Date Demonstrate 3 independent randomized controlled clinical trials demonstrate statistically significant improvements in SOT scores when PT + High Frequency Pulse PoNS is compared to PT + no stimulation in multiple disease states Montreal Neurological Inst

  11. Slide 11: Results from Multiple Sclerosis Study

    Active ArmPlacebo ArmActive ArmPlacebo Arm Active ArmPlacebo Arm ** Results from Multiple Sclerosis Study fMRI Changes in Group A, B vs Healthy Controls **dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) ***rostral anterior cingulate cortex (rACC) 14 subject (7/7) study: All received physiotherapy with Group

  12. Slide 12: Results from Multiple Sclerosis Study: Working Memory fMRI

    www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT HFP Stim Arm No Perceptible Stim Arm Group A: Post PoNS™ device training fMRI shows significant increase in BOLD signal in the left DLPFC** (t=3.55, p=0.01), rACC*** (t=3.057, p=0.02) and a trend for significance in the right DLPFC (t=2.3, p=0.06). Result

  13. Slide 13: Clearly Defined Regulatory Pathway

    Clearly Defined Regulatory Pathway FDA deemed the study of the PoNSTM for mild-moderate TBI a ‘non-significant risk (NSR) device study’ under the IDE regulations Assessed the study as not posing a significant risk to human subjects FDA guidance points to 120-day regulatory review upon submission for

  14. Slide 14: So, what does an SOT of 40 look like?

    So, what does an SOT of 40 look like? The mean baseline SOT in our clinical trial was approximately 40 (42.1 and 41.1 in HFP and LFP respectively) This video is of a patient that did not participate in our clinical trial It is shown to demonstrate the clinical presentation of a person with an SOT sc

  15. Slide 15: What does an SOT Score look like?

    What does an SOT Score of 40 look like? www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT

  16. Slide 16: The Clinical Study

    Th Clinical Study A double-blind, randomized, controlled* study of the safety and effectiveness of the PoNS™ device for translingual noninvasive neuromodulation stimulation (“TLNS”) training in subjects with a chronic balance deficit due to mTBI. Indication Chronic balance deficit due to non-severe

  17. Slide 17: Important Inclusion Criteria For the Study

    Important Inclusion Criteria For the Study All subjects were at least one year post injury Further spontaneous recovery unlikely All subjects had to: have participated in a focused physical rehabilitation program for their TBI related balance disorder and have been deemed by the treating clinician t

  18. Slide 18: Statistical Analysis Plan for TBI Study

    Statistical Analysis Plan for TBI Study www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT Assess Primary Endpoint: responder analysis of HFP vs LFP at 5 weeks If responder analysis is statistically significant If responder analysis is not statistically significant Collapse HFP and LFP into a single group

  19. Slide 19: Statistical Analysis Safety Endpoints

    Statistical Analysis Safety Endpoints Primary: Frequency of falls, as determined by daily event recording on the subject data case report form during the in clinic phase. Fall is defined as an episode where a subject lost his or her balance and fell or would have fallen, were it not for another inte

  20. Slide 20: PoNS Responder Analysis – Primary Endpoint

    PoNS Responder Analysis – Primary Endpoint P<0.081 HFP PoNS group response showed a trend to significant change vs response of LFP PoNS Group N=61 N=61 Responders = 15 point improvement in SOT above baseline www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT

  21. Slide 21: PoNS Study Data Efficacy

    PoNS Study Data Efficacy Normal Range SOT Score N=61 N=61 www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT SOT Score *HFP: Mean increase over baseline at end of Week 2 = 20.9 with 95% lower confidence limit of 16.6, p< 0.025 **HFP: Mean Increase over baseline at end of Week 5 = 27.3 with 95% lower confi

  22. Slide 22: Is the LFP Device Demonstrating Therapeutic Activity?

    Is the LFP Device Demonstrating Therapeutic Activity? It was prospectively contemplated that LFP device might potentially have a therapeutic effect. Thus, in the statistical analysis plan it was proposed that if secondary effectiveness endpoints did not generate p-value of less than 0.05, (data show

  23. Slide 23: Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint Combined Data Analysis at Week 2

    Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint Combined Data Analysis at Week 2 When mean of the combined data set is significantly greater than zero, it indicates that results for both devices combined demonstrate statistically significant improvement in SOT scores. Device N Mean SD SE 95% Conf. Interval p-value

  24. Slide 24: Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint Combined Data Analysis at Week 5

    Secondary Effectiveness Endpoint Combined Data Analysis at Week 5 When mean of the combined data set is significantly greater than zero, it indicates that results for both devices combined demonstrate statistically significant improvement in SOT scores. Device N Mean SD SE 95% Conf. Interval p-value

  25. Slide 25: US Medical Method Patents Issued

    7 US Medical Method Patents Issued Skin Stimulation + Physical Therapy = Therapeutic Outcome Skin Stimulation + Cognitive Therapy = Therapeutic Outcome Oral Cavity Stimulation + Physical Therapy = Therapeutic Outcome Oral Cavity Stimulation + Cognitive Therapy = Therapeutic Outcome Oral Cavity Stimu

  26. Slide 26: Primary Safety Endpoint Met – Decrease in Number of Falls

    Primary Safety Endpoint Met – Decrease in Number of Falls www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT

  27. Slide 27: Secondary Safety Endpoint Met - Headache Disability Index

    Secondary Safety Endpoint Met - Headache Disability Index Showed a General Lowering in Both Groups www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT

  28. Slide 28: Long Term Treatment Study

    Long Term Treatment Study Study completed May 28th, 2017 Tactile Communication Neurorehabilitation Laboratory at University of Wisconsin-Madison Sponsored by US Army Double blind randomized controlled trial in patients with mild to moderate TBI 22/21 patients High Frequency Pulse stimulation Vs Low

  29. Slide 29: Patients in both Groups were Significantly Clinically Better

    Patients in both Groups were Significantly Clinically Better at 2 weeks, 14 weeks and 26 weeks 12 weeks washout – no stimulation On Average Patients improved from an impaired SOT score to normal SOT Score in 14 weeks of treatment with HFP Normal Score was maintained throughout 12 week washout period

  30. Slide 30: Dynamic Gait Index

    Dynamic Gait Index Both treatment groups had baseline scores in the 'elevated risk of fall category' (≤ 19; normal=24) By the end of participation, the scores for both groups approached normal levels (Active: 22.82; Control: 22.65) N=22 N=21 www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT DGI

  31. Slide 31: Patients in both Groups Demonstrated an overall Reduction in Headaches

    Patients in both Groups Demonstrated an overall Reduction in Headaches www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT HDI

  32. Slide 32: So, what does a normal SOT score look like?

    So, what does a normal SOT score look like? This video is of a patient that did not participate in our TBI clinical trials but had previous experience with the therapy It is shown to demonstrate the clinical presentation of a person with a Normal SOT score Every subject is different and there are ma

  33. Slide 33: Video of Subject with SOT Score in Normal Range

    Video of Subject with SOT Score in Normal Range www.heliusmedical.com | TSE:HSM | OTCQB:HSDT

  34. Slide 34: Overall Conclusion

    Overall Conclusion In three previously published independent controlled clinical trials: PT + HFP PoNS therapy has been observed to be statistically significantly superior to PT with no stimulation in SOT scores HFP PoNS therapy produced FMRI confirmed statistically significant neuro plastic change

Helius Medical Technologies — Investor Presentation (November 2017) on 6ix