Novavax, Inc. · NASDAQ:NVAX

Novavax — Investor Day (September 2015)

102 slides from Novavax's investor day presentation, September 2015

  1. Slide 1: Analyst & Investor Meeting

    Analyst & Investor Meeting September 2015

  2. Slide 2: Safe Harbor Statement

    Safe Harbor Statement Certain information contained herein, particularly information relating to future financial or business performance, conditions or strategies and other financial and business matters, including expectations regarding clinical development, product sales, operating expenses, our

  3. Slide 3: Agenda

    Agenda 9:00 – 9:10 a.m. • Welcome and Corporate Overview 9:10 – 9:30 a.m. • Nanoparticle Technology: A New Paradigm 9:30 – 9:40 a.m. • Seasonal Influenza Clinical Update 9:40 – 9:55 a.m. • RSV Burden of Disease in Older Adults • RSV Clinical Update • Older Adults 9:55 – 10:15 a.m. • Maternal Phase I

  4. Slide 4: Breaking News

    Breaking News NOVAV, BILL@MELINDA GATES foundation Novavax Amnounces Grant of up to $89 Million to Support Development of RSV F Vaccine to Protect Infants via Maternal Immunization Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to support development of the RSV F Vaccine Program Gaithersburg, Md., September 29, 20

  5. Slide 5: Breaking News

    Breaking News NOVAVAX Novavax Announces Positive Top-Line Data from Phase 2 Clinical Trial of RSV F Vaccine to Protect Infants via Maternal Immunization RSV F Vaccine was safe and well-tolerated Significant anti-F, PCA and microneutralizing antibody responses elicited in mothers Efficient antibody t

  6. Slide 6: Breaking News

    Breaking News NOVAVAX Novavax Announces Positive Top-Line Data from RSV F Vaccine Phase 1 Clinical Trial in Pediatrics Novavax’ fifth positive top-line clinical trial announcement of the 3"¢ quarter Gaithersburg, Md., September 29, 2015 — Novavax, Inc., (Nasdaq: NVAX) a clinical-stage vaccine compan

  7. Slide 7: Investment Thesis

    Investment Thesis Novavax Vaccine Platform • Recombinant nanoparticle technology induces robust immunity • Matrix‐M™ adjuvant increases magnitude and quality of immune response Clinical Development Programs • RSV: Older adults, infants via maternal immunization, pediatrics • Seasonal & Pandemic Infl

  8. Slide 8: Product Pipeline

    Product Pipeline Funding Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Support RSV Older Adults (60+) Infants (Maternal Immunization) Pediatrics (6 mos – 6 yrs) Influenza Quadrivalent Seasonal Pandemic (H7N9 + Matrix‐MTM) New Product Opportunities Ebola + Matrix‐MTM Combination Respiratory 8

  9. Slide 9: Recent Accomplishments

    Recent Accomplishments Q3‐14 Q4‐14 Q1‐15 Q2‐15 Q3‐15 Q4‐15 RSV Older Adults (60+) Phase 2 Infants (Maternal Immunization) Phase 2 Pediatrics (6 mos – 6 yrs) Phase 1 Influenza Quadrivalent Seasonal Phase 2 Pandemic (H7N9 + Matrix‐MTM) Phase 1/2 New Product Opportunities Ebola + Matrix‐MTM Phase 1 Dat

  10. Slide 10: Projected Highlights: 2016

    Projected Highlights: 2016 Initiation of: Phase 3 pivotal RSV F Vaccine in Older Adults • Data 4th quarter, 2016 Phase 3 pivotal RSV F Vaccine to Protect Infants via Maternal Immunization • Trials initiated in U.S., S. Africa, Argentina…more Phase 2 RSV F Vaccine Booster Trial in Older Adults • Data

  11. Slide 11: Nanoparticle Platform Technology: A New Paradigm

    Nanoparticle Platform A New Paradigm Technology 11

  12. Slide 12: Novavax Platform Technology

    Novavax Platform Technology Click here to view video 12

  13. Slide 13: Novavax Nanoparticle Vaccines: New Paradigm

    Novavax Nanoparticle Vaccines: New Paradigm Traditional vaccines “mimic” pathogens Edward Jenner, vaccinating a baby in 1796, coined term 'vaccination' to describe inoculation of cowpox from milk maids to induce immunity to smallpox Viruses escape immune surveillance by hiding conserved epitopes req

  14. Slide 14: Novavax Nanoparticle Technology

    Novavax Nanoparticle Technology Recombinant Nanoparticles: Virus‐Like Particles (VLP) RSV F & Ebola GP Seasonal & Pandemic Influenza HA trimers Hydrophilic NA tetramers head of protein trimers M1 Matrix Protein Hydrophobic tail of protein No genetic trimers material Nanoparticles Influenza VLPs • Co

  15. Slide 15: RSV F Hidden Neutralizing Epitopes

    RSV F Hidden Neutralizing Epitopes Competitive ELISA RSV F Epitope Sites I, II and IV Phase 2 Trial, Women of Childbearing Age, F 120µg + AlPO4 0.4mg Site I Site II (PCA) Site IV LLOQ 1Beeler et al, Neutralization Epitopes of the F Glycoprotein of Respiratory Syncytial Virus: Effect of Mutation upon

  16. Slide 16: Ebola GP Hidden Neutralizing Epitopes

    Ebola GP Hidden Neutralizing Epitopes • 13C6, KZ52 (ZMapp™) and Ebola GP Phase 1 Trial other GP neutralizing epitopes mAb 13C6 Competitive ELISA are hidden Competative ELISA Titer (Log2) • NVAX Ebola GP vaccine + Matrix‐M induces antibodies against hidden epitopes • 100% protective in NHP Day 0 Day

  17. Slide 17: Matrix-M Adjuvant Enhances and Broadens Responses to Epitopes

    Matrix‐M™ Adjuvant Enhances and Broadens Responses to Epitopes1 Matrix‐M is a nanoparticle composed of saponins, cholesterol, and lipids Nano‐particulate (~40 nm) formulation of saponin with cholesterol and phospholipid Green: Buried Red: Exposed epitopes epitopes Non‐adjuvanted Adjuvanted H7N9 Vacc

  18. Slide 18: Novavax Nanoparticle Vaccines: Proving Effective

    Novavax Nanoparticle Vaccines: Proving Effective RSV F Vaccine – Older Adults Ebola GP Vaccine – Non‐human Primates 1.00 135 g RSV F Vaccine 5µg Ebola GP Vaccine Proportion of Group With 0.98 (n=11) No RSV Infection 0.96 0.94 Placebo 0.92 Placebo (n=5) 0.90 0 50 100 150 200 Time to RSV Onset (days)

  19. Slide 19: Summary: New Nanoparticle Vaccine Paradigm

    Summary: New Nanoparticle Vaccine Paradigm Nanoparticle technology platform based on antigens with conserved, hidden epitopes essential for virus replication • RSV F, Ebola GP, Rabies G, Influenza HA Unlike traditional vaccines that ‘mimic’ viruses, nanoparticles expose amino acid sequences critical

  20. Slide 20: Nanoparticle Technology Applied to Emerging Threats

    Nanoparticle H7N9 Influenza Technology Applied to Ebola Emerging Threats 20

  21. Slide 21: H7N9 Vaccine Phase 2 Clinical Trial

    H7N9 Vaccine Phase 2 Clinical Trial H7N9: Initial GMP vaccine released for human use in 81 days from project inception Data published in New England Journal of Medicine Trial Overview Objectives Outcomes • Phase 2 • Evaluate HAI and NAI • Strong adjuvant effect • 610 adults antibody responses of Mat

  22. Slide 22: Matrix-M Enables H7N9 HAI Responses

    Matrix‐M Enables H7N9 HAI Responses • 4 to 5‐fold increase in HAI titer • Dose‐sparing H7N9 HAI GMT (95% CI) 22

  23. Slide 23: H7N9 NAI Responses

    H7N9 NAI GMT (95% CI) H7N9 NAI Responses 23

  24. Slide 24: Ebola GP Vaccine Phase 1 Clinical Trial

    Ebola GP Vaccine Phase 1 Clinical Trial Ebola: GMP vaccine released for human use in 94 days from project inception Trial Overview Objectives Outcomes • Phase 1 • Evaluate antibody • Strong adjuvant effect • 230 adults responses to GP and of Matrix‐M • Makona strain whole Zaire Ebola virus • Robust

  25. Slide 25: Ebola GP IgG ELISA (Makona Strain)

    Ebola GP IgG ELISA (Makona Strain) Novavax Makona GP ELISA • 2 doses of vaccine with 6.5 µg, 2 doses w/Matrix‐M 50000 adjuvant over 100‐fold more immunogenic Geometric Mean ELISA Units • Dose‐sparing at 6.5µg 5000 6.5 µg, 1 dose w/Matrix‐M 500 6.5 µg, 2 doses, unadjuvanted Placebo 50 0 5 10 15 20 25

  26. Slide 26: Nanoparticle Technology for Emerging Viruses

    Nanoparticle Technology for Emerging Viruses • Demonstrated in H7N9, Ebola and MERS • Adaptable to new threats on a short timeline • Rapid manufacturing process • Thermostable at 2‐8º C • Matrix‐M enables dose–sparing and protective responses:  Enhanced immunogenicity for “difficult” antigens  Pro

  27. Slide 27: Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine Clinical Update

    Quadrivalent Seasonal Clinical Update Influenza Vaccine 27

  28. Slide 28: Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Phase 2 Clinical Trial

    Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Phase 2 Clinical Trial Trial Overview Objectives Outcomes • Phase 2 • Evaluate • Improved HAI and NAI • 400 adults immunogenicity responses • Quadrivalent seasonal • Demonstrate that • Fullfills CEBR vaccine; 4 strains: immunogenicity can seroconversion and • A/Califo

  29. Slide 29: Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine - HAI

    Quadrivalent Seasonal Influenza Vaccine ‐ HAI • At 15µg dose, all 4 strains met CBER criteria for seroprotection and seroconversion • Competitive with licensed trivalent seasonal influenza vaccine 29

  30. Slide 30: Summary: Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza Programs

    Summary: Seasonal and Pandemic Influenza Programs Seasonal Influenza Pandemic Influenza • Produced & tested every WHO/FDA • Achieved threat strain sequence to recommended strain since 2009 GMP production & release in <90 • Demonstrated rapid adaptability to days produce late‐emerging strain • Delive

  31. Slide 31: RSV F Vaccine Burden of Disease in Older Adults

    RSV F Vaccine Burden of Disease in Older Adults 31

  32. Slide 32: The Burden of RSV Disease in Older Adults

    The Burden of RSV Disease in Older Adults William Schaffner, MD Professor of Preventive Medicine, Department of Health Policy Professor of Medicine, Division of Infectious Diseases Vanderbilt University School of Medicine 32

  33. Slide 33: Respiratory Syncytial Virus - RSV

    Respiratory Syncytial Virus ‐ RSV • Originally reported as a cause of severe respiratory infections in young children • Now recognized as causing severe disease in older adults: Community – dwelling Those with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease cardiopulmonary disease long‐term care nursing homes

  34. Slide 34: RSV Disease Burden in the Elderly (≥65 yrs) - U.S.

    RSV Disease Burden in the Elderly (≥ 65 yrs) – U.S. Deaths 14,000 ER (151,801) + Hospital ˜852,680 Medical Admissions (203,612) Interventions = ˜355,400 (14.8% of RSV (35.5% of infections) RSV infections) Physician Office Visits ~497,280 (17% of RSV infections – healthy) (29% of RSV infections ‐ hig

  35. Slide 35: RSV - Clinical Manifestations

    RSV – Clinical Manifestations RSV(%) Influenza(%) Nasal congestion 22‐78 64 Cough 90+ 89 Sore throat 16‐64 64 Shortness of breath 51‐93 32 Wheezing 33‐90 30 Muscle pain 10‐64 70 Fever 48‐56 72 Onset Gradual Sudden Branche and Falsey. Drugs Aging, 2015. Sundaram et al. CID, 2014. Falsey et al. JID, 2

  36. Slide 36: RSV - Complications

    RSV ‐ Complications • Patients with COPD, cardiopulmonary disease • Pneumonia: 30‐50% of hospitalized patients RSV viral Bacterial co‐infection • Respiratory failure requiring intensive care admission: • 8‐13% of hospitalized patients Branche and Falsey. Drugs Aging, 2015. Mullooly et al. Vaccine, 2

  37. Slide 37: RSV - Epidemiology

    RSV ‐ Epidemiology Community‐dwelling older adults (65+) studied over 4 years Healthy: 3‐7%/year High‐risk: 4‐10%/year Falsey, N Engl J Med, 2005 37

  38. Slide 38: Annual RSV Morbidity and Mortality

    Annual RSV Morbidity and Mortality 177,500 Hospital admissions with respiratory symptoms 11,000‐17,000 Older adults die Walsh, Infect Disorder Drug Targets, 2012 38

  39. Slide 39: Comparability of RSV and Influenza

    Comparability of RSV and Influenza Falsey et al. NEJM, 2005 and Volling et al. BMC Infect Dis, 2014 39

  40. Slide 40: RSV and Influenza are Comparably Severe

    RSV and Influenza are Comparably Severe 4‐years (1989‐1992) Hospitalized patients age 65+ with influenza‐like or cardiopulmonary illness Diagnosis Deaths Influenza 11% 6% RSV 10% 10% Falsey, J Infect Dis, 1995 40

  41. Slide 41: Burden of Disease for RSV, Influenza, and Pneumococcal Pneumonia

    Burden of Disease for RSV, Influenza, and Pneumococcal Pneumonia in Adults 65 and Older in U.S. RSV Influenza* Pneumonia Number of Infections 2,400,000 2,883,052 1,286,556 Hospitalization 203,600 262,095 339,853 Deaths 14,000 14,607 22,449 *Average of 3 past seasons, 2010‐2013; includes vaccine aver

  42. Slide 42: RSV F Vaccine Phase 2 Clinical Trial in Older Adults

    RSV F Vaccine Phase 2 Clinical Trial in Older Adults 42

  43. Slide 43: Novel RSV F Vaccine

    Novel RSV F Vaccine Novel RSV Fusion‐protein vaccine (RSV F Vaccine) developed using recombinant nanoparticle technology Elicits palivizumab competing antibodies (PCA) Palivizumab levels correlate to protection Six clinical trials completed or initiated, demonstrating safety and immunogenicity in ov

  44. Slide 44: RSV Vaccine Target Populations

    RSV Vaccine Target Populations Infants Older Adults Pediatrics via Maternal Immunization Healthy individuals Children Infants <6 months 60+ years and high >6 months ‐ 5 years risk adults 44

  45. Slide 45: RSV F-Protein Presents Multiple Conserved Sites

    RSV F‐Protein Presents Multiple Conserved Sites RSV Surface Proteins Site I • G protein: Variable • F protein: Conserved Site IV Antigenic site II • Targeted by palivizumab (Synagis®) and motavizumab Site II • Antibodies shown to prevent RSV disease in infants in 5 randomized clinical trials • Crypt

  46. Slide 46: Phase 2 RSV F Vaccine Clinical Trial in Older Adults

    Phase 2 RSV F Vaccine Clinical Trial in Older Adults Trial Overview Goals Method Trial Overview Goals Method • Phase 2 trial • Evaluate the • All subjects with randomized, incidence of symptomatic observer‐blinded symptomatic RSV respiratory illness • 10 trial sites in U.S. illness in 60+ were teste

  47. Slide 47: P2 Older Adults: Study Objectives

    P2 Older Adults: Study Objectives Primary Secondary Exploratory • Epidemiology trial • Estimate efficacy of • Evaluate amplitude of vaccine on all • Describe the PCA and incidence of all symptomatic RSV microneutralizing respiratory illnesses symptomatic antibody responses respiratory illnesses • Ex

  48. Slide 48: P2 Older Adults: Study Population and Demographics

    P2 Older Adults: Study Population and Demographics RSV F Vaccine Placebo Study Populations Safety 798 801 Intent‐to‐Treat 798 798 Per‐Protocol 759 771 Percent Male 42.0 41.7 Mean Age, yrs (SD) 69.4 (6.5) 69.5 (6.4) Percent 60‐75 yrs 82.7 82.1 Percent >75 yrs 17 17.9 Race (%) White 90.4 90.9 Black 7.

  49. Slide 49: P2 Older Adults: RSV Epidemiology Trial Results

    P2 Older Adults: RSV Epidemiology Trial Results 4.9% of placebo with symptomatic RSV infections • Pharyngitis, nasal congestion, cough, wheezing, shortness of breath or increased sputum production • Defines the RSV attack rate in this population 88% of RSV infected subjects with LRTI symptoms1 • Cou

  50. Slide 50: P2 Older Adults: Anti-F Antibody Response

    P2 Older Adults: Anti‐F Antibody Response • Durable, 4.8‐fold1 increase in anti‐F IgG response • Seroresponse in >93% of subjects2 6000 Anti‐F IgG GMEU1 (95% CI) 5000 135 g RSV F Vaccine 4000 3000 2000 Placebo 1000 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Days 1 geometric mean rise relative to Day 0 2% of group with

  51. Slide 51: P2 Older Adults: PCA Response

    P2 Older Adults: PCA Response • Durable, 5.2‐fold1 increase in PCA response • Seroresponse in >96% of subjects2 120 100 135 g RSV F Vaccine PCA GMC 1 (µg/mL) 80 60 40 Placebo 20 0 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 Days 1 geometric mean rise relative to Day 0 2 % of group with EU >95th percentile of the placebo g

  52. Slide 52: P2 Older Adults: RSV A and B Microneutralizing Antibodies

    P2 Older Adults: RSV A and B Microneutralizing Antibodies 2.1 Geometric Mean Rise in Neutralizing Titers 1.9 (baseline adjusted) 1.7 1.5 1.3 1.1 0.9 RSV F Placebo RSV F Placebo RSV F Placebo RSV F Placebo Vaccine RSV/A Vaccine RSV/A Vaccine RSV/B Vaccine RSV/B RSV/A RSV/A RSV/B RSV/B Day 28 Day 56 D

  53. Slide 53: P2 Older Adults: Early and Durable Protection from RSV Infection

    P2 Older Adults: Early and Durable Protection from RSV Infection 1.00 Proportion of Group With No RSV Infection 0.98 135 g RSV F Vaccine 0.96 Placebo 0.94 p=0.039 0.92 October 31, 2014 April, 15, 2015 0.90 0 50 100 150 200 Time to RSV Onset (days) RT‐PCR confirmed RSV Events Product‐Limit Survival

  54. Slide 54: P2 Older Adults: Relative Risk and Efficacy Estimates

    P2 Older Adults: Relative Risk and Efficacy Estimates Population Endpoint Placebo Vaccine Efficacy P‐value ITT Total N 798 798 All symptomatic RSV 39 23 41% 0.041 Per protocol Total N 771 759 All symptomatic RSV 38 21 44% 0.031 RSV LRTI (ad hoc) 33 18 45%1 0.041 60 to <75 yrs Total N 636 630 All sym

  55. Slide 55: P2 Older Adults: Analysis of RSV LRTI and Difficulty Breathing

    P2 Older Adults: Analysis of RSV LRTI and Difficulty Breathing Measures of more severe illness: Number of Symptoms Number of vaccine vs Vaccine and Signs Reported* placebo subjects P‐value Efficacy Any symptomatic RSV 21 vs 38 44% 0.031 At least 3 LRTI signs and 5 vs 14 64% 0.047 symptoms (ad hoc) A

  56. Slide 56: RSV Older Adults Data Results Analogous to Prevnar 13

    RSV Older Adults Data Results Analogous to Prevnar 13 Endpoint and Analysis Episodes PCV13 Placebo % Vaccine P Value (N = 42,256) (N = 42,256) Efficacy Infection with vaccine‐type strain Confirmed community‐acquired pneumonia1* 139 49 90 46% <0.001 Per‐protocol analysis Invasive pneumococcal disease

  57. Slide 57: Efficacy of Licensed Influenza Vaccines

    Efficacy of Licensed Influenza Vaccines • Novavax RSV F Vaccine efficacy is similar to or better than a number of respiratory vaccines1,2,3 • Vaccine effectiveness is lower in older adults Season Vaccine Effectiveness Vaccine Effectiveness in in All Ages Older Adults 2007‐8 37% 37% 2009‐10 56% ‐6%*

  58. Slide 58: RSV Older Adults: Lessons Learned

    RSV Older Adults: Lessons Learned • Well‐conducted study • Attack rate in line with previously published data • MARI/hospitalizations logistics will be improved to enable data collection • Follow‐up with study nurse at‐home visitations will be added to improve swabbing rates to capture full incidenc

  59. Slide 59: P2 Older Adults: Summary

    P2 Older Adults: Summary 4.9% of older adults had symptomatic RSV disease 88% of these illnesses were associated with LRTI 44% reduction in symptomatic RSV in vaccinees 64% reduction in LRTI with difficulty breathing Durable protection for the entire RSV season First study to demonstrate effective R

  60. Slide 60: RSV Older Adults: Next Steps

    RSV Older Adults: Next Steps Next Steps Manufacture and release Phase 3 Trial Objectives product Proposed endpoints* Phase 3 Trial Design End of Phase 2 meeting Primary: Prevent Initiate Phase 2 Booster symptomatic RSV illness as Older adults, ages 60+ Study indicated by patient 8,000‐10,000 partici

  61. Slide 61: Next Steps: Older Adults Phase 2 Booster Trial

    Next Steps: Older Adults Phase 2 Booster Trial • Annual seasonal vaccine • Phase 2 older adult subjects provide a unique opportunity to demonstrate the need and desirability of a boost Vaccine 1,600 participants Placebo Vaccine Placebo Vaccine Placebo • Proposed trial endpoints will be similar to Ph

  62. Slide 62: RSV F Vaccine Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Protect Infants via Maternal Immunization

    RSV F Vaccine Phase 2 Clinical Trial to Protect Infants via Maternal Immunization 62

  63. Slide 63: RSV F Vaccine Maternal Immunization Highlights

    RSV F Vaccine Maternal Immunization Highlights Today announced a grant of up to $89 million from the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation to support development of the RSV F Vaccine Phase 3 clinical trial in pregnant women • P3 trial planned to initiate during the first quarter of 2016 • Will support reg

  64. Slide 64: P2 Maternal Immunization: Study Objectives

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Study Objectives Primary Secondary • Mothers: Describe safety of the RSV F • Mothers: Evaluate amplitude and vaccine through delivery and 6 months duration of anti‐F IgG, PCA and RSV A/B post‐delivery microneutralizing antibody responses in • Infants: Describe safety throug

  65. Slide 65: P2 Maternal Immunization: Design and Protocol

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Design and Protocol Treatments • 120µg RSV F + 0.4mg aluminum phosphate • Randomization was stratified by age: • 18 to < 29 years and 29 to ≤40 years Design: Maternal Treatment RSV F Antigen Aluminum Dosing Subjects per Group Label Content Adjuvant Content Volume Group, N A

  66. Slide 66: P2 Maternal Immunization: Safety Follow-up

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Safety Follow‐up Infant participants were assigned to one of two postpartum phlebotomy cohorts: Mothers: Infant cohort 1*: Infant cohort 2**: Day 14* Delivery +14 days +35 days +60 days +180 days *Passive and active follow‐up for RSV disease began day 14 **An infant blood d

  67. Slide 67: P2 Maternal Immunization: Maternal Population and Demographics

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Maternal Population and Demographics Active Placebo Safety 22 28 ITT 22 28 Per‐protocol 22 28 Mean Age +/‐ SD (yrs) 27.8 +/‐ 4.53 27.7 +/‐4.91 18 to <29 yrs 59% 57% 29 to ≤40 yrs 41% 43% White 82% 79% Black 14% 14% Asian 7% 5% BMI (kg/m2) 30 30 67

  68. Slide 68: P2 Maternal Immunization: Safety Summary

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Safety Summary The vaccine was safe for both mothers and infants • Increase in local AEs (placebo, 4%; vaccine, 59%) • Predominantly mild‐moderate, transient injection site pain No Severe Respiratory Events • No hospitalizations • No enhanced disease RSV Infections • Two RS

  69. Slide 69: P2 Maternal Participants: Anti-F IgG

    P2 Maternal Participants: Anti‐F IgG 14000 120 mg RSV F Vaccine + 0.4 mg AlPO4 adjuvant Anti‐F IgG GMEU1 (95% CI) 12000 10000 8000 6000 4000 Placebo 2000 0 0 14 Delivery Delivery + 35 Days 1geometric mean rise relative to Day 0 69

  70. Slide 70: P2 Maternal Participants: PCA

    P2 Maternal Participants: PCA 350 120 mg RSV F Vaccine 300 + 0.4 mg AlPO4 adjuvant PCA GMC1 (95% CI) 250 200 150 100 50 Placebo 0 0 14 Delivery Delivery + 35 Days 1geometric mean rise relative to Day 0 70

  71. Slide 71: P2 Maternal Participants: RSV A and B Microneutralizing Antibodies

    P2 Maternal participants: RSV A and B Microneutralizing Antibodies 4 Geometric Mean Rise in Neutralizing Titers (baseline adjusted) 2 1 Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Active Placebo Day 14 post‐ Delivery Day 35 post‐ Day 14 post‐ Delivery Day 35 post‐ vacc

  72. Slide 72: Infant/Maternal Anti-F Antibody Ratio

    P2 Infants: Time from Vaccination to Delivery (Days) Impacts Placental Antibody Transfer Cord Blood Titer/ Maternal Serum Titer Delivery < 30 days Post Vaccination Delivery > 30 days Post Vaccination Infant/Maternal Anti‐F Antibody Ratio Time from Vaccination to Delivery Ad hoc analysis Excludes 1 m

  73. Slide 73: P2 Infants: Time from Vaccination to Delivery Impacts Placental Antibody Transfer

    P2 Infants: Time from Vaccination to Delivery (Days) Impacts Placental Antibody Transfer Del. < 30d Del. > 30d Assay Source post vacc., post vacc., All n=7 * n=14 n=21* Anti F IgG Cord 7,227 8,659 8,153 Mothers 12,979 6,993 8,594 Important Findings: Ratio 0.6 1.2 0.9 • Maternal antibody peaks 14d af

  74. Slide 74: P2 Infants: Estimated RSV Antibody Half-life

    P2 Infants: Estimated RSV Antibody Half‐life Vaccine Anti‐F IgG Cord Blood, GMEU (95% CI) 7307 (5113‐10443) Half Life 30 days PCA Cord Blood, GMC (95% CI) 189 (151‐236) Half Life 41 days RSV/A MN Cord Blood, GMT (95% CI) 691 (452‐1056) Half Life 36 days RSV/B MN Cord Blood, GMT (95% CI) 496 (310‐793

  75. Slide 75: P2 Maternal Immunization: RSV F Vaccine Elicits Additional Known Neutralizing Antibodies

    P2 Maternal Immunization: RSV F Vaccine Elicits Additional Known Neutralizing Antibodies Site I Delivery GMT (95% CI) Placebo Vaccine Site IV Mother <20 (<20‐25.2) 161 (119‐217) Site I Site II Cord Blood 25 (<20‐35) 135 (99‐184) Mother <20 (<20‐<20) 96 (71‐129) Site IV Cord Blood 20 (<20‐<20) 86 (64

  76. Slide 76: P2 Maternal Immunization: Primary Objective Outcomes

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Primary Objective Outcomes No observed prenatal, labor, delivery or immediate postpartum safety issues • Short‐term local reactogenicity is low • No meaningful imbalance in unsolicited AEs • No vaccine related SAEs No observed safety issues related to fetal well‐being and i

  77. Slide 77: P2 Maternal Immunization: Secondary Objective Outcomes

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Secondary Objective Outcomes Robust immune response to vaccine in mothers • Anti‐F IgG, PCA, and microneutralizing antibody responses are similar to prior trials in women of child‐bearing age All antibody measures show transient dilution at delivery, rebound at day 35 post‐

  78. Slide 78: P2 Maternal Immunization: Next Steps

    P2 Maternal Immunization: Next Steps Next Steps Manufacture and 1Q16 release product Proposed endpoints* Adaptive trial design End of Phase 2 meeting Primary: Prevention of Anticipated subjects: Initiate Phase 3 trial RSV bronchiolitis with 4,500 to 9,000 hypoxia Expect to initiate Phase 3 Secondary

  79. Slide 79: RSV F Vaccine Pediatrics

    RSV F Vaccine Pediatrics 79

  80. Slide 80: RSV F Vaccine Phase 1 Trial in Pediatrics

    RSV F Vaccine Phase 1 Trial in Pediatrics Trial Overview Status Method • Phase 1 trial • Trial completed with • 60 µg dose with or randomized, observer‐ smaller cohort due to without aluminum blinded, dose‐ranging onset of RSV season adjuvant study to evaluate safety • Safety in 32 subjects was • Im

  81. Slide 81: P1 Pediatrics: Study Objectives

    P1 Pediatrics: Study Objectives Primary Secondary Exploratory • Accumulate safety • Describe immune • Describe immune data for the responses to responses to candidate vaccine formulations and formulations and formulations and regimens in terms regimens in terms regimens of serum of serum IgG • Deter

  82. Slide 82: RSV Pediatrics: Phase 1 Recruited Subjects

    RSV Pediatrics: Phase 1 Recruited Subjects Placebo 60µg ++ 60µg + 60µg ‐ ‐ 60µg – Population N=7 N=6 N=6 N=6 N=7 ITT 7 (100%) 5 (83.3%) 6 (100%) 6 (100%) 7 (100%) Per protocol 3 (42.9%) 4 (66.7%) 5 (83.3%) 2 (33.3%) 4 (57.1%) Age >24 ‐ <36 mos. 2 (28.6%) 1 (16.7%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) 0 (0.0%) >36 ‐ <7

  83. Slide 83: P1 Pediatrics: Safety Summary

    P1 Pediatrics: Safety Summary All RSV F Vaccine formulations were well‐tolerated No significant differences in adverse events between RSV F Vaccine and placebo Solicited systemic adverse events were highest in the placebo group No severe unsolicited events reported 83

  84. Slide 84: P1 Pediatrics: Anti-F IgG, Per Protocol

    P1 Pediatrics: Anti‐F IgG, Per Protocol Anti‐F IgG 60µg ++ 60µg + 60µg ‐ ‐ 60µg – Placebo N=4 N=5 N=2 N=4 N=3 Baseline 689 1,236 1,789 1,853 1,318 Day 14 GMEU 21,563 15,417 14,039 16,103 1,385 Day 14 fold‐rise (95% CI) 23.8 12.4 9.2 10.4 1.1 (11.4‐49.9) (6.7‐23.0) (3.4‐24.8) (5.1‐21.2) (0.5‐2.4) Day

  85. Slide 85: P1 Pediatrics: PCA, Per Protocol

    P1 Pediatrics: PCA, Per Protocol PCA 60µg ++ 60µg + 60µg ‐ ‐ 60µg – Placebo N=4 N=5 N=2 N=4 N=3 Baseline <14 22.1 31.3 42.0 16.9 Day 14 421.6 363.3 339.4 422.6 17.9 Day 14 fold‐rise (95% CI) 33.3 25.4 15.7 19.5 1.0 (15.1‐73.5) (12.1‐53.2) (5.5‐45.2) (6.6‐57.2) (0.4‐2.4) Day 28 442.6 385.4 302.3 356.

  86. Slide 86: P1 Pediatrics: RSV A Microneutralizing Antibodies

    P1 Pediatrics: RSV A Microneutralizing Antibodies Per Protocol 32 DAY 28 Geometric Mean Rise in Neutralizing Titers DAY 56 16 DAY 14 (baseline adjusted) 8 4 2 1 60µg + 60µg + 60µg 60µg Placebo 60µg + 60µg + 60µg 60µg Placebo 60µg + 60µg + 60µg 60µg Placebo Al x 2 Al x 1 w/o Al x w/o Al x Al x 2 Al x

  87. Slide 87: P1 Pediatrics: RSV B Microneutralizing Antibodies

    P1 Pediatrics: RSV B Microneutralizing Antibodies Per Protocol 32 Geometric Mean Rise in Neutralizing Titers DAY 28 DAY 56 DAY 14 16 (baseline adjusted) 8 4 2 1 60µg + 60µg + 60µg 60µg Placebo 60µg + 60µg + 60µg 60µg Placebo 60µg + 60µg + 60µg 60µg Placebo Al x 2 Al x 1 w/o Al x w/o Al x Al x 2 Al x

  88. Slide 88: RSV Pediatrics: Preliminary Conclusions

    RSV Pediatrics: Preliminary Conclusions The vaccine was well‐tolerated The vaccine was highly immunogenic • Limited benefit to second dose • Findings similar to prior study in women of childbearing age Data support advancement to Phase 2 88

  89. Slide 89: Af ae

    Af ae D ( landscap F \ \ lh

  90. Slide 90: RSV F Vaccine Franchise 2016 Activity

    RSV F Vaccine Franchise 2016 Activity Funding Preclinical Phase 1 Phase 2 Phase 3 Support RSV Older Adults (60+) Infants (Maternal Immunization) Pediatrics (6 mos – 6 yrs) TBD 90

  91. Slide 91: RSV Incidence and Burden in Major Markets

    RSV Incidence and Burden in Major Markets Infections/Year: ~37 M Total Cost Burden: ~$88 B US EU5 ASIA (UK, Italy, France, Spain, Germany) (Japan, South Korea, Taiwan) ~15 M ~14 M ~8 M Infections/Year Infections/ Year Infections/Year ~$5 B ~$3 B ~$1.4 B Direct Cost Burden Direct Cost Burden Direct C

  92. Slide 92: Target U.S. Segment for RSV Immunization

    Target U.S. Segment for RSV Immunization ~98M Individuals U.S. population by target RSV patient segment (2014) 64.8 97.9 90 80 70 Millions of people 60 50 The 40 11.5 30 12.0 20 5.9 10 3.7 0 Pregnancies Infant Toddler High risk Older Addressable ≥34 wks >6 ‐ ≤24 mos >24 ‐ ≤60 mos 50 ‐ 59 yrs adults

  93. Slide 93: Annual Burden of RSV Disease in Older Adults

    Annual Burden of RSV Disease in Older Adults, 65 Years of Age and Older ~14,000 (0.5%) Deaths3 ~157,000 ~531,000 (20.9%) (6.2%) Physician Visits1 ER Visits2 2.5M (5.5%) Infections1 Note on percentages: • Infection percentage is relative to target U.S. segment ~177,000 (7%) • Burden percentages relat

  94. Slide 94: Annual Economic Burden of RSV in Older Adults Exceeds $24 Billion

    Annual Economic Burden of RSV in Older Adults Exceeds $24 Billion USD $87 M ER Visits2,5 $110 M Physician Visits1,6,7 2.5M Infections1 $2,800 M Hospital Visits1,4,8 $21,500 M Deaths3,9 Values represent estimated US dollars in 2015. Based on currently available literature, additional economic evaluat

  95. Slide 95: Annual Burden of RSV Disease in Infants 0-6 Months of Age

    Annual Burden of RSV Disease in Infants 0‐6 Months of Age ~140 (0.01%) Deaths3 ~109,000 (8%) ~260,000 (19.1%) Physician Visits2 ER Visits2 1.36M (69%) Infections1 Note on percentages: • Infection percentage is relative to ~33,400 (2.5%) target U.S. segment Hospital Admissions2 • Burden percentages r

  96. Slide 96: Annual Economic Burden of RSV in Infants Exceeds $770 Million

    Annual Economic Burden of RSV in Infants 0‐6 Months of Age Exceeds $770 Million USD $ 60 M ER Visits2,4 $ 36 M Physician Visits2,4,6 1.36M Infections1 $ 315 M Hospital Visits2,4,5 $ 360 M Deaths3,7 Values represent estimated US dollars in 2015. Based on currently available literature, additional eco

  97. Slide 97: US Vaccine Comparator Prices Range from ~$30 to $750

    US Vaccine Comparator Prices Range from ~$30 to $750 Indicating Market Support for Pricing in this Range Average non‐discounted price for course† of comparator vaccines by patient segment 400 $345 AWP* ($) for full course – 2015 300 $38/dose $187 200 $176 $750/course $137 100 0 Maternal Pediatric Ol

  98. Slide 98: The Commercial Strategy Relies on Reaching Across Key Stakeholders

    The Commercial Strategy Relies on Reaching Across Key Stakeholders Who Influence Treatment Decisions U.S. Launch Campaign Policy Support timely, evidence‐based policy recommendations and guidelines encouraging appropriate patient access Product The first and only RSV vaccine, with demonstrated effic

  99. Slide 99: Building Towards Commercialization

    Building Towards Commercialization P2 Data P3 P3 Data BLA License ACIP Launch Disease awareness Marketing Provider target market Brand strategy KOL development Publication planning Medical Affairs Data generation strategy Provider education Payer research Align advocates and medical associations Mar

  100. Slide 100: Looking at RSV in Our Patient Segments

    Looking at RSV in Our Patient Segments Adults with compromised immune systems and Infants have immature immune systems those 60 and older are also at increased risk of and are vulnerable to infection severe disease There are 2.5 million RSV infections in older There are 1.4 million RSV infections in

  101. Slide 101: Summary

    Summary RSV is a significant disease, comparable to influenza and pneumonia The first and only RSV vaccine, with demonstrated efficacy and safety, that reduces symptomatic RSV and RSV associated with difficulty breathing Worldwide RSV F Vaccine revenue opportunity estimated to be $6‐8B per year 101

  102. Slide 102: Investment Thesis

    Investment Thesis Novavax Vaccine Platform • Recombinant nanoparticle technology induces robust immunity • Matrix‐M™ adjuvant increases magnitude and quality of immune response Clinical Development Programs • RSV: Older adults, infants via maternal immunization, pediatrics • Seasonal & Pandemic Infl

Novavax — Investor Day (September 2015) on 6ix