Pacific Gas & Electric Co. · NYSE:PCG

Pacific Gas & Electric — PG&E — Goldman Sachs 6th Annual Power and Utility Conference 2006

24 slides from Pacific Gas & Electric's conference presentation, May 10, 2006

  1. Slide 1: PG&E Corporation: Customer Focused, Value Driven

    PG&E Corporation: Customer Focused, Value Driven Goldman Sachs 6th Annual Power and Utility Conference Las Vegas, NV May 10-12, 2006

  2. Slide 2: Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information

    SLIDE 2 Cautionary Statement Regarding Forward-Looking Information This presentation contains forward-looking statements regarding management’s guidance for PG&E Corporation’s 2006 and 2007 earnings per share from operations, capital expenditures, Pacific Gas and Electric Company’s (Utility) rate ba

  3. Slide 3: Strategic Direction

    SLIDE 3 Strategic Direction Our vision The leading utility in the United States Our goals Delighted Energized Rewarded customers employees shareholders Our strategies Operational excellence Transformation Our values We act with integrity and communicate honestly and openly. We are passionate about m

  4. Slide 4: Business Priorities 2006-2010

    SLIDE 4 Business Priorities 2006-2010 Advance business transformation Provide attractive shareholder returns Increase investment in utility infrastructure Implement an effective energy procurement plan Improve reputation through more effective communications Evaluate the evolving industry and relate

  5. Slide 5: The Virtuous Circle

    SLIDE 5 The Virtuous Circle OUR VISION The leading utility in the United States Delighted Customers Satisfied Regulators Rewarded Shareholders

  6. Slide 6: Transformation Phases

    SLIDE 6 Transformation Phases Strategy/ Roadmap Preliminary Design & Analysis Detailed Design Build/ Test Implementation & Operational Handover Planned deployment of initiatives: 2005: 20 initiatives were fully or partial deployed 2006: 33 other initiatives will be fully or partially deployed

  7. Slide 7: Transformation Enhancing Performance - Examples

    SLIDE 7 Transformation Enhancing Performance - Examples Today (Manual) Outage Management Customer notifies the utility of a problem Troubleman assesses scope of outage Customized construction information prepared New Residential Service Developer completes paper application for new service Multiple

  8. Slide 8: Anticipated Transformation Net Costs and Benefits

    SLIDE 8 Anticipated Transformation Net Costs and Benefits Expense ($mm) 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Net Cost Range 86 115 6 Net Benefit Range -18 -137 -141 -142

  9. Slide 9: Operational Performance Metrics

    SLIDE 9 Operational Performance Metrics 2005 EOY Actual 2006 YTD Actual 2006 YTD Target 2006 EOY Target Overall customer satisfaction (composite of J. D. Power residential and business customer surveys) 94.0 94.5 94.0 96.0 Timely bills (% billed within 35 days) 99.38% 99.53% 99.53% 99.51% Estimate o

  10. Slide 10: 2007 GRC

    SLIDE 10 2007 GRC Utility requests $433 million revenue requirement (RRQ) increase over the projected authorized 2006 base RRQ. Intervenor Testimony Filed Division of Ratepayer Advocates (DRA) request is approximately $450 M below PG&E’s request. The Utility Reform Network (TURN) request is being an

  11. Slide 11: Capital Expenditure Outlook

    SLIDE 11 Capital Expenditure Outlook Capital expenditures average $2.5B per year for years 2006-2010: 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Cap Ex 2.5 2.8 2.6 2.4 2.2 Includes capital expenditure estimates for Contra Costa 8, Diablo Canyon Steam Generator Replacement Project, Humboldt Bay Power Plant, and PG&E S

  12. Slide 12: Rate Base Growth

    SLIDE 12 Rate Base Growth 2006 2007 2008 2009 2010 Average Annual Rate Base ($B)* 15.9 17.4 18.6 19.9 20.7 * 2006-2010 rate base is not adjusted for the impact of the carrying cost credit that primarily results from the second series of the Energy Recovery Bonds. Earnings will be reduced by an amoun

  13. Slide 13: Potential Additional Capital Expenditures

    SLIDE 13 Potential Additional Capital Expenditures Potential additional capital expenditures related to the following possible projects are not included in the capital expenditure projections: 657 MW utility-owned generation submitted to the CPUC for approval as part of the Long-Term procurement pla

  14. Slide 14: Executed Agreements Pursuant to Long-Term RFO

    SLIDE 14 Executed Agreements Pursuant to Long-Term RFO Counterparty/ Facility Size(MW) Contract Type Operational Date Plant Type Term Long-Term Need: Calpine Hayward 601 Power Purchase Agmt 2010 Combined cycle 10 EIF Firebaugh 399 Power Purchase Agmt 2009 Combustion turbine 20 EIF Fresno 196 Power P

  15. Slide 15: EPS Guidance

    SLIDE 15 EPS Guidance EPS from Operations*: 2006 guidance of $2.40-$2.50 per share 2007 guidance of $2.65-$2.75 per share 2005A 2006E 2007E Low 2.4 2.65 Guidance Range 0.1 0.1 Actual 2.34 Operating EPS Assumptions ($MM) 2006 2007 Rate Base $15,900 $17,400 Equity Ratio 52% 52% Authorized ROE 11.35% 1

  16. Slide 16: EPS Growth

    SLIDE 16 EPS Growth EPS from operations growth targeted to average approximately 7.5% annually 2006-2010 Places us near the top of comparable companies Actual growth rate will depend on infrastructure investments Five-Year Estimated Earnings Growth PCG AEE AEP CNP ED ETR FPL NI PNW PGN SO TE XEL Ear

  17. Slide 17: Appendix

    SLIDE 17 Appendix

  18. Slide 18: 2005 EPS - Reg G Reconciliation

    SLIDE 18 2005 EPS - Reg G Reconciliation 2005 EPS on an Earnings from Operations Basis $2.34 Items Impacting Comparability: Incremental interest costs related to generator disputed claims from Chapter 11 proceedings (0.01) Prior year’s portion of the gain associated with AEAP settlement 0.24 Costs o

  19. Slide 19: EPS Guidance - Reg G Reconciliation

    SLIDE 19 EPS Guidance - Reg G Reconciliation 2006 Low High EPS Guidance on an Earnings from Operations Basis* $2.40 $2.50 Estimated Items Impacting Comparability 0.00 0.00 EPS Guidance on a GAAP Basis $2.40 $2.50 2007 Low High EPS Guidance on an Earnings from Operations Basis* $2.65 $2.75 Estimated

  20. Slide 20: Cost of Operations - Reg G Reconciliation

    SLIDE 20 Cost of Operations - Reg G Reconciliation The reconciliation of non-GAAP cost of operations to Operating and Maintenance Expense is: 2005 2006 2006 2006 EOY Actual YTD Actual YTD Target EOY Target External GAAP Operating and Maintenance Expense $3,399 $862 $871 $3,552 Public Purpose and Oth

  21. Slide 21: Definitions of Operational Performance Metrics

    SLIDE 21 Definitions of Operational Performance Metrics Overall Customer Satisfaction. PG&E measures residential and business customer satisfaction with annual industry wide surveys conducted by J.D. Power and Associates, as well as with proprietary studies using the same survey in intervening quart

  22. Slide 22: Definitions of Operational Performance Metrics (continued)

    SLIDE 22 Definitions of Operational Performance Metrics (continued) Telephone Service Level. Measures the percent of customer calls that have been either (1) completed by automated voice response systems for self-service, or (2) answered in 20 seconds or less by customer service representatives. Tot

  23. Slide 23: Key Pending Regulatory Proceedings

    SLIDE 23 Key Pending Regulatory Proceedings Pending approval Completion of CC8 Decision expected Q2 2006 Advanced Metering Infrastructure Decision expected 7/06 2007 GRC Decision expected 12/06 Electric Transmission Owner 8 Settlement Decision expected Q3 2006 Generation LT RFO & Humboldt Bay PP Dec

  24. Slide 24: Expected 2007 GRC Timeline

    SLIDE 24 Expected 2007 GRC Timeline File Application Filed on December 2, 2005 Prehearing Conference Held on January 23, 2006 Intervenor testimony April 28 Evidentiary hearings May 31 - July 7 Briefs and reply briefs July 27 - August 10 ALJ proposed decision November 14 Final commission order Decemb

PG&E — Goldman Sachs 6th Annual Power and Utility Conference 2006 on 6ix