Balchem Corporation · NASDAQ:BCPC

Balchem — Technical Presentation (November 2024)

66 slides from Balchem's technical presentation, November 2024

  1. Slide 1: Up-cycling Low Value Proteins Through Functional Food Technologies

    Up-cycling Low Value Proteins Through the Use of Functional Food Technologies Promotes Sustainability While Enhancing Profitability C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  2. Slide 2: Starkey Laboratory: Processing Product Upcycling and Pet Food

    Starkey Laboratory Processing Product Upcycling and Pet Food C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  3. Slide 3: Starkey Laboratory

    Starkey Laboratory • 107 Undergraduate research assistants • 43 International visiting scholars • 22 Graduate students • Training in Food Science • Abstract generation ~80 • Publishable projects ~20 • 1 undergraduate Thesis • 4 Masters Thesis C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I

  4. Slide 4: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Low-value Protein conversion co- products  Often sold for rendering  Co-products are often sold at 6-13¢ per kg. • Pet treats saveur.com  Valuable product ($22 to ≥ 55 per kg)  Pet food manufacturers already use animal co-products to manufacture pet treats rich

  5. Slide 5: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Animal co-products (ACP) may be considered a delicacy, or an undesired material destined for purposes other than human consumption • They do not participate largely in American dish and are rarely found on menus  Marti et al, 2012 • ACP are rich in protein, vitamin

  6. Slide 6: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Processing is the conversion of live animals into smaller retail cuts for human consumption  USDA, 2013 • Processing generates lower value co-products C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  7. Slide 7: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Combined value of production from broilers, eggs, turkeys, and the value of sales from chickens in 2020 was $35.5 billion, 61% from broilers  USDA, 2020 • Total number of broilers Raw wing tips (WT) produced in 2020 was 9.22 billion  USDA, 2020 C O L L E G E O F A

  8. Slide 8: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Chicken co-products are the most common protein source used in dry dog treats  Watson, 2006 • United States has a robust poultry industry, with an inventory of over 518 million chickens  Shahbandeh, 2021 • For the last decade, the United States has exported 6 to 7

  9. Slide 9: Introduction

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Parts of processed animal not included in dressed carcasses  Galanakis, 2018 • Animal co-products (ACP) are often repurposed for other usages than human consumption  Ockerman & Basu, 2014 • Co-products can represent up to 44% and 37% of cattle and poultry live wei

  10. Slide 10: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Broiler wing tips (WT) are a low-value broiler processing co-product • WT are in abundant supply and can be repurposed into more marketable products Raw broiler WT saveur.com C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  11. Slide 11: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Broiler carcass frames and Wooden Breast (WB) meat are low-value broiler co-products • Both are in abundant supply and can be repurposed into more marketable products Broiler carcass frames Wooden Breast C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N

  12. Slide 12: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Largest gland in animals and most consumed animal co- product • Contains a protein level close to lean meat • High levels of carbohydrates • Rich in Fe, Mg, Cu, vitamins A, B6, B12, C, niacin, and folacin C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N

  13. Slide 13: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Represents 0.5% of cattle live weight  Ockerman and Basu, 2014 • Rich in protein, niacin, riboflavin, Fe, Zn, Se, and P  Marti et al, 2012 • Consumed as a deli and used in traditional gastronomy in some countries C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y

  14. Slide 14: Introduction: Animal Co-Products

    Introduction Animal Co-Products • Processing co-products have additional opportunities to supply a valuable protein source to the pet food industry • Establishing quality parameters for certain processing products is useful for future product development Pet treats in packaging system C O L L E G E

  15. Slide 15: Overview of the Pet Food Industry

    Introduction Overview of the Pet Food Industry • Pet humanization and premiumization of pet foods have led to significant changes in animal co-product markets  Mullen et al, 2017 • Pet owners seek new protein-based and healthy food products for their pets  Mullen et al., 2017 • Pet food manufactur

  16. Slide 16: Overview of the Pet Food Industry

    Introduction Overview of the Pet Food Industry • Nearly 82% of pet owners buy some type of treats with some regularity  Simmons National Consumer Survey, 2014 • Pet owners frequently provide treats to cats and dogs as a demonstration of affection and reward or a way to motivate them during training

  17. Slide 17: Overview of the Pet Food Industry

    Introduction Overview of the Pet Food Industry • Pet treats success in the market is influenced by several factors such as price, packaging, marketing claims, and sensory properties  Koppel, 2014 • Treats’ sensory attributes such as appearance, color, texture, and flavor can contribute to their acc

  18. Slide 18: Overview of the Pet Food Industry

    Introduction Overview of the Pet Food Industry • Pet industry expenditures  Of the $103.6 billion spent on pets, $42 billion were for pet food and pet treats in 2020  Out of 90.5 million households with a pet there are 69 million with at least one dog  Dog food and treats market was valued at $66

  19. Slide 19: Overview of the Pet Food Industry

    Introduction Overview of the Pet Food Industry C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  20. Slide 20: Global Pet Product Growth Projections by Category 2012-2017

    Global Pet Product Growth Projections by Category 2012-2017

  21. Slide 21: Overview of the Pet Food Industry

    Introduction Overview of the Pet Food Industry • Co-products are the most common protein source used in dry dog treats  Watson, 2006 Dog treats Chicken liver and heart (Mullins, 2021) pet treats C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  22. Slide 22: Restructured Pet Treats from ACP

    Restructured Pet Treats from ACP • Animal co-products (ACP) can be processed into restructured pet treats by using hydrocolloids as functional ingredients  Challen and Moorhouse, 2011 • Hydrocolloids are high molecular weight polymers used to improve the rheological and textural properties of food

  23. Slide 23: Economics

    Economics Input Costs/lb Costs/week Paws $0.76 $76,000 ALGIN $2.77 $16,346.65 Packaging $0.64 $65,184 Labor $0.75 $75,000 Total $4.92 $232,530.65 C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  24. Slide 24: Hydrocolloids in Product Development: Sodium Alginate

    Hydrocolloids in Product Development Sodium Alginate • Alginate is a type of hydrocolloid used in product development as a structure- forming ingredient  Qin et al., 2018 • Alginate can provide mechanical strength and flexibility to restructured meat products, such as pet treats C O L L E G E O F A

  25. Slide 25: Hydrocolloids in Product Development: Sodium Alginate

    Hydrocolloids in Product Development Sodium Alginate • Alginate is produced from marine brown algae  Goh et al, 2012 • Alginate is extracted from algal tissue and brought into solution by neutralization with an alkali, such as sodium carbonate • Soluble sodium alginate is precipitated and converted

  26. Slide 26: Hydrocolloids in Product Development

    Hydrocolloids in Product Development • Hydrocolloids are high- molecular-weight, hydrophilic molecules • Used as functional ingredients in food Ching et al., 2017 formulation • Increases food consistency, improves gelling effect, and controls the microstructure, texture, flavor, and shelf life of fo

  27. Slide 27: Hydrocolloids in Product Development: Sodium Alginate

    Hydrocolloids in Product Development Sodium Alginate • Sodium alginate is a hydrocolloid with gelling and stabilizing properties that could improve textural characteristics of meat products  Edley, 2007 • Divalent metal ions, such as calcium, line up alginate chains to form a stable gel Egg-box str

  28. Slide 28: Hydrocolloids in Product Development: Alginate Gelation

    Hydrocolloids in Product Development Alginate Gelation • Calcium salts can be totally soluble, sparingly soluble, and insoluble • Calcium lactate is a totally soluble calcium salt with a rapid gelation rate and poorly controlled  Challen and Moorhouse, 2011 • Because of the fast gelation rate, mixt

  29. Slide 29: Hydrocolloids in Product Development: Alginate Gelation

    Hydrocolloids in Product Development Alginate Gelation • Calcium lactate may be encapsulated to control release of calcium ions into a soluble alginate solution for gel formation and development of restructured products  Challen and Moorhouse, 2011 Sodium alginate Ca 2+ C O L L E G E O F A G R I C

  30. Slide 30: Introduction: Restructured pet treats

    Introduction Restructured pet treats • ALGIN= sodium alginate + encapsulated calcium lactate • ALGIN can enhance the quality and add stability to mixtures of minced protein components through a gelation process • Co-products may be processed into pet treats by using ALGIN as Sodium alginate a struct

  31. Slide 31: The process

    The process Chicken liver and heart Chicken carcass frames Chicken paws Raw product Mixtures Final product C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  32. Slide 32: The process

    The process C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  33. Slide 33: The products

    The products C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  34. Slide 34: The products

    The products C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  35. Slide 35: The products

    The products C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  36. Slide 36: The products

    The products C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  37. Slide 37: Materials and methods: Cooking

    Materials and methods Cooking • WT were cooked in a GoWise electric pressure cooker (n = 4) with 7% added water  At 55 kPa for 90 min  Average cooking moisture loss was 18.57% Raw WT Draining pressure Pressure cooked, cooked WT drained WT C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E

  38. Slide 38: Materials and methods: Grinding

    Materials and methods Grinding • Cooked WT were ground twice  First grind: kidney grinder plate  Second grind: 4.8-mm grinder plate Kidney grinder WT after first grind plate 4.8-mm grinder plate WT after second grind C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  39. Slide 39: Materials and methods: ALGIN inclusion

    Materials and methods ALGIN inclusion Sodium alginate and encapsulated ALGIN addition calcium lactate ALGIN 0x 0.5x 1x 2x Sodium alginate, % 0.000 0.500 1.000 2.000 Encapsulated calcium lactate, % 0.000 0.425 0.850 1.700 C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  40. Slide 40: Materials and methods: Sample preparation

    Materials and methods Sample preparation • Each mixture was stuffed into 63.5-mm-diameter casings, and secured with hog rings • Chubs were stored at 4 °C for 12 h to facilitate gelation, and then frozen at -20 °C for 3 h prior to slicing into 5-mm-thick slices • For data collection, samples were sto

  41. Slide 41: Materials and methods: Sample Preparation

    Materials and methods Sample Preparation • Oven was set at 93 °C until samples’ internal temperature reached 74 °C • Smokehouse temperature was dropped to 66°C until treats’ water activity (aw) reached 0.80 • Expressible moisture and cooking loss were measured on raw samples • Color variation and te

  42. Slide 42: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Physico-chemical Characteristics

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Physico-chemical Characteristics • Water Activity (aw)  Important attribute that assesses food stability with respect to microbial growth, chemical, and biological reactions  Park, 2008 • pH  Quality parameter that affects color, water holding capacity, tenderness

  43. Slide 43: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Physico-chemical Characteristics

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Physico-chemical Characteristics • Expressible moisture  Amount of liquid squeezed from products’ protein system by the application of external forces  Pearce et al., 2011 • Cooking loss  Loss of sample weight in percentage during cooking, caused by heat-induced p

  44. Slide 44: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Textural Characteristics

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Textural Characteristics • Rheological and structural properties of foods perceived by senses of sound, sight, and touch  Chen and Opara, 2013 • Textural properties of pet foods may affect their palatability and provide pleasant sensations that stimulate pets to eat

  45. Slide 45: Textural characteristics Measurements: Texture Profile Analysis

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Textural characteristics Measurements • Texture Profile Analysis (TPA) • Double compression type test that mimics first two bites of the mastication process of foods in the mouth • Assesses Hardness, Adhesiveness, Cohesiveness, Springiness, and Chewiness of pet treat

  46. Slide 46: Textural Characteristics Measurements

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Textural Characteristics Measurements Adapted from Centre for Industrial Rheology C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  47. Slide 47: Textural Characteristics Measurements: Shear Force Test

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Textural Characteristics Measurements • Shear Force Test • Measures degree of tenderness of meat products • Evaluates Firmness and Firmness Toughness of pet treats Stable Micro Systems C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  48. Slide 48: Textural Characteristics Measurements: Three-point Bending Test

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Textural Characteristics Measurements • Three-point Bending Test • Measures break strength or flexibility by bending samples Peak force • Assesses Peak force and Flexibility of pet treats Stable Micro Systems C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I

  49. Slide 49: Materials and methods: Texture analysis 3PB

    Materials and methods Texture analysis: 3-point bend (3PB) • Hardness, flexibility, and stiffness were analyzed applying the 3PB bend test to 10 samples per treatment (TA-HDplusC with a TA-43R probe)  Hardness, g  Flexibility, mm  Stiffness, g per mm • Blade speed was 1 mm per s for 10 mm C O L L

  50. Slide 50: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Color Variation

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Color Variation • Consumers rely heavily on fresh meat color as an indicator of wholesomeness at the point of sale  Suman and Joseph, 2014 • Pet owners rely on pet treats characteristics such as color to make judgments on their quality and purchase decisions  Guy,

  51. Slide 51: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Color Variation

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Color Variation • Color is brain perception of an object after its interaction with light • Perceived color is affected by three components:  Lawless and Heymann, 2010 C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  52. Slide 52: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Color Variation

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Color Variation • Color of meat products is mainly influenced by myoglobin and is also affected to smaller extents by other pigments such as hemoglobin and cytochrome c  Bechtold et al., 2018 • When meat products are exposed to heat during cooking, myoglobin loses i

  53. Slide 53: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Color Variation

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Color Variation • Pet parents rely on pet treats’ physical characteristics such as color to make judgments on their quality and purchase decisions  Guy, 2015 • Human color perception of foods is subjective and is affected by our visual characteristics and preference

  54. Slide 54: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Color Variation

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Color Variation • Instrumental color measurement simulates the ability of human eyes to perceive colors and can provide quantitative values  Mancini and Hunt, 2005 • One of the most common methods to analyze instrumental color analysis is using a CIE L* a* b* www.hu

  55. Slide 55: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Color Variation

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Color Variation • Data on color was collected on d 0, 3, 5 and 7 post- production  L* - Lightness o 0 to 100, black to white  a* - Redness o -120 to 120, green to red  b* - Yellowness o -120 to 120, blue to yellow Adapted from Cavanaugh, 2008 C O L L E G E O F A G

  56. Slide 56: Results: Lightness (L*) of raw pet treats

    Results Lightness (L*) of raw pet treats ALGIN INCLUSION × TIME 70 P < 0.0001 SEM ≤ 0.1370 68 66 64 a abc ab ab ab bc Lightness, L* d d c d d 62 e e f f 60 g 58 56 54 52 50 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 ALGIN inclusion, x 0 3 5 7 Time post-production, d C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R

  57. Slide 57: Results: Redness (a*) of raw pet treats

    Results Redness (a*) of raw pet treats ALGIN INCLUSION × TIME 30 P < 0.0001 SEM ≤ 0.1016 25 a c b d 20 Redness, a* 15 e g f h i k j 10 l n n n m 5 0 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 ALGIN inclusion, x 0 3 5 7 Time post-production, d C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E

  58. Slide 58: Results: Yellowness (b*) of raw pet treats

    Results Yellowness (b*) of raw pet treats ALGIN INCLUSION × TIME 26 P < 0.0001 SEM ≤ 0.0753 a 24 b c 22 d Yellowness, b* 20 e e gh gh f hi fg i j 18 k l l 16 14 12 10 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 0 0.5 1 2 ALGIN inclusion, x 0 3 5 7 Time post-production, d C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O

  59. Slide 59: Quality Parameters of Pet Treats: Color Variation

    Quality Parameters of Pet Treats Color Variation • Regardless of ALGIN inclusion over time post-production, lightness decreased, redness and yellowness increased. • Delta-e (The measure of change in visual perception of two given colors) values indicate that the color differences among treatments du

  60. Slide 60: Conclusions

    Conclusions • Animal co-products combinations and ALGIN inclusions can be utilized to improve pet treats’ quality characteristics, enabling new product development opportunities for the pet food industry • Inclusion of ALGIN improved water retention of treats and allowed less water during cooking lo

  61. Slide 61: Economics

    Economics Input Costs/lb Costs/week Paws $0.76 $76,000 ALGIN $2.77 $16,346.65 Packaging $0.64 $65,184 Labor $0.75 $75,000 Total $4.92 $232,530.65 Sale price $18.20 $1,820,000 Difference $13.28 $1,587,469.35 C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  62. Slide 62: Summary

    Summary • Demands for pet treats has increased in the last few decades • This trend has affected animal co-product markets which can be used to develop treats rich in protein, vitamins, and minerals • Hydrocolloids show potentials for adding values to animal co- products by improving sensory propert

  63. Slide 63: Completed work

    Completed work • Chicken liver / chicken hearts • Beef liver / beef hearts • Wooden breast carcass frames 1 • Wooden breast carcass frames 2 • Paws • Wing tips • Slice thickness • Food chemistry  Texture  Color  Sensory C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  64. Slide 64: Future studies

    Future studies • Conduct consumer sensory and pet palatability evaluations • Evaluate the ability of different processing co-product combinations to form various pet treat types sciencemeetsfood.org • Evaluate meat products combined with non-meat products to develop functional pet treats • Reconstit

  65. Slide 65: Future work

    Future work • Sensory • Oxidative chemistry • Complete and balanced • In home palatability • Field applications, soldier and dog co-nutrient delivery • Human nutrient supplementation C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

  66. Slide 66: Thank You

    Thank You Charles Starkey cstarkey@auburn.edu +1-334-758-1750 C O L L E G E O F A G R I C U LT U R E P O U LT R Y S C I E N C E

Balchem — Technical Presentation (November 2024) on 6ix