CERo Therapeutics Holdings, Inc. · OTC:CERO

CERo Therapeutics — Phoenix Biotech Acquisition — SPAC Merger (August 2023)

46 slides from CERo Therapeutics's SPAC merger presentation, Aug 14, 2023

  1. Slide 1: The Next Era in Cell Therapy

    The Next Era in Cell Therapy A u g u s t 2 0 2 3

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimers and Other Important Information

    Disclaimers and Other Important Information 2 This presentation (this “Presentation”) is provided for informational purposes only and for no other purpose and has been prepared to assist interested parties in making their own evaluation with respect to a potential business combination by and among C

  3. Slide 3: Disclaimers and Other Important Information: Forward-Looking Statements

    Disclaimers and Other Important Information 3 Forward - Looking Statements Certain statements included in this Presentation are not historical facts but are forward - looking statements for purposes of the safe harbor provisions under the United States Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 199

  4. Slide 4: Overview

    • First - in - Class cell therapy candidate for cancer, combining Phagocytosis and Tumor Cell Lysis in a single engineered T Cell • Targets a unique cell surface “Eat Me” ligand – Phosphatidylserine – upregulated on tumors • Demonstrated tumor - killing in NSCLC, Ovarian Cancer, MCL and AML – all tu

  5. Slide 5: A Simple Idea Became a Novel, Powerful Therapeutic

    A Simple Idea Became a Novel, Powerful Therapeutic Engineering Engulfment into T Cells 5

  6. Slide 6: T Cells Are the Right Chassis

    • Lysis, tumor cell apoptosis • Proliferation and serial killing • Trafficking to tumors • Release of anti - tumor cytokines • Persistence and memory formation • 20+ years of research and clinical experience • 10+ years of manufacturing expertise • FDA experience, familiarity and comfort T Cells Are

  7. Slide 7: Phosphatidylserine (PS) – The Right Target

    • PS is a pro - phagocytic “Eat Me” signal that triggers cell removal by macrophages • Cell surface PS is significantly upregulated on apoptotic cells, virally infected cells, under cell stress conditions, or on tumor cells • Resides in the internal lipid bilayer of normal healthy cells – normal exp

  8. Slide 8: CER-T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor

    CER - T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor Tumor Cell PS CER CER - T Cell Chimeric engulfment receptor T cells (CER - T) binds to phosphatidylserine (PS), the “eat me” signal on tumor cell 8 BIND

  9. Slide 9: CER-T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor

    CER - T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor Tumor Cell PS CER CER - T Cell Peptide processing and presentation Tumor cell fragments ENGULFMENT Chimeric engulfment receptor T cells (CER - T) binds to phosphatidylserine BIND Binding to PS mediates the capture and uptake of tumor cell fragment

  10. Slide 10: CER-T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor

    Tumor Cell PS CER CER - T Cell Peptide processing and presentation MHC I MHC II Helper T cells Cytotoxic T cells ADAPTIVE Immune Responses Tumor cell fragments ENGULFMENT CER - T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor Chimeric engulfment receptor T cells (CER - T) binds to phosphatidylserine B

  11. Slide 11: CER-T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor

    Chimeric engulfment receptor T cells (CER - T) binds to phosphatidylserine Binding to PS mediates the capture and uptake of tumor cell fragments, Tumor cell phagocytosis leads to efficient tumor antigen capture, CER - T Cells Designed to Eliminate the Entire Tumor BIND EAT PRESENT Intracellular sign

  12. Slide 12: In Vivo Evidence of Anti-Tumor Killing

    0 10 40 50 20 30 Days post T cell infusion 0 500 1000 1500 2000 Tumor Volume (mm 3 “ SEM) CER T cells In Vivo Evidence of Anti - Tumor Killing 12 A Single Infusion of CER - T Cells EGFR - mutant NSCLC cells Robust anti - tumor in vivo responses across solid and hematologic models Single infusion of

  13. Slide 13: Highlights

    IND and clinical signal expected within investment timeframe GROUNDBREAKING BIOLOGY Powerful multi - modal approach to eliminating the entire tumor PREPARING FOR THE CLINIC Process development and pre - IND meeting completed, going into liquid tumors and potentially solid tumors (complete data set i

  14. Slide 14: Management team

    Brian Atwood Chief Executive Officer • Co - founder, President and CEO of Cell Design Labs (acquired by Gilead in 2017) • Chair, Phoenix Biotech Acquisition Corp • Former Chair, Locust Walk Acquisition Corp (NASD: LWAC) • Managing Director of Versant Ventures, co - founder in 1999 • Director and Cha

  15. Slide 15: CAR-T Has Been Transformative, but Challenges Persist

    CAR - T Has Been Transformative, but Challenges Persist Tumor Escape Myeloid Dysfunction THE CONSEQUENCE Limited widespread use Antigen Heterogeneity T Cell Exhaustion Tumor Microenvironment Suppression Ineffective in Solid Tumors 15

  16. Slide 16: Phagocytosis by TIM-Receptor

    Phagocytosis by TIM - 4 Receptor CERo has observed TIM - 4 - mediated phagocytosis in CER - T cells Tumor Cell CER - T Cell • A natural phagocytic receptor • Involved in clearing billions of unwanted cells each second in our body • Acquires tumor associated antigens to activate anti - tumor response

  17. Slide 17: What is a CER-T cell?

    What is a CER - T cell? himeric ngulfment eceptor C E R Uses TIM - 4 Phagocytic Receptor to Engage Tumor Targets via the Cell of Damaged Receptor Phosphatidylserine (PS) Tumor Cell PS Tumor Cell CER - T Cell Multifunctional Construct Transmembrane Extracellular Domain Tumor binding and phagocytosis

  18. Slide 18: AMLs Upregulate the Eat Me Signal Phosphatidylserine

    20 0 40 60 80 100 % Target Positive 18 Acute Myeloid Leukemias Upregulate the “Eat Me” Signal Phosphatidylserine TIM - 4 binding Normalized to Mode Treatment naïve AML BMMC Healthy BMMC AML + Therapy AML Upregulation of Cell - surface “Eat Me” Target Across AML Subtypes High Levels of ”Eat Me” Targe

  19. Slide 19: Ovarian tumor samples TIM-4 binding

    Age at Surgery Histology Stage Grade Type of Chemotherapy Chemo Regimen Tumor Site Tumor % pos for TIM - 4 Binding 52 High grade serous 3c 3 Neoadjuvant Carboplatin + Taxol Left ovary 90 54 High grade serous 4 3 Neoadjuvant Carboplatin + Taxol Right ovary 90 57 Clear cell 1a1 3 None N/A Left ovary 9

  20. Slide 20: Multi-modal approach to tumor cell sensing, killing, and elimination

    20 Multi - modal approach to tumor cell sensing, killing, and elimination Combining the body’s natural clearance machinery with enhanced T cell cytotoxic effects can amplify the body’s anti - tumor response MORE POTENT MORE DURABLE LOW OBSERVED TOXICITY Favorable potential toxicity profile is quiete

  21. Slide 21: Optimizing the Therapeutic - What We Learned

    Optimizing the Therapeutic - What We Learned Serial killing, high proliferative capacity, and multi - functionality Absence of auto - activation, or premature exhaustion Preservation of naïve and memory phenotype Distinct transcriptome, cytokine, and chemokine repertoire Enhanced antigen acquisition

  22. Slide 22: Empowered T Cells with Phagocytic Potency

    Tumor elimination via target - dependent phagocytosis Phagocytosis (%) CER - 1236 Empowered T Cells with Phagocytic Potency Untransduced CER - 1236 Mutant TIM - 4 CER - 1251 CER T cell Tumor cell Phagocytosis NSCLC 22 Molecular Therapy, 2023 May 16. PMID: 37194236.

  23. Slide 23: CER-1236 Phagocytic and Cytotoxic Transcriptional Signatures

    Comprehensive RNA Analysis Showed CER - 1236 Possesses Phagocytic and Cytotoxic Transcriptional Signatures RNA - seq IPA analysis Combines cytotoxic and phagocytic function into single T cells 23 Molecular Therapy, 2023 May 16. PMID: 37194236. Differentially expressed genes among CER 1236 stimulated

  24. Slide 24: CER-1236 Potent Cytotoxic Responses Against AML

    0 2 4 6 8 10 0 12 22 32 42 52 62 74 86 96 106 116 Time (hrs) No T cells Untransduced CER - 1236 2:1 E:T 0 0 1 2 3 4 No T c U CER - 1236 Induces Potent Cytotoxic Responses Against High Risk Acute Myeloid Leukemia Subtypes 24 Mutated FLT - 3 - ITD AML Mutated TP53 AML Kasumi - 1 AML Cells MV4 - 11 AML

  25. Slide 25: CER-1236 Cytotoxic Responses to B Cell Lymphomas and Solid Tumors

    CER - 1236 Induced Potent Cytotoxic Responses In Vitro to Both B Cell Lymphomas and Solid Tumors Mantle Cell Lymphoma (MCL) EGFR - mutant NSCLC NSCLC Cells JeKo - 1 TMEM30a 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 80 90 100 110 120 130 140 0 5 10 15 20 25 70 Time (hrs) No T cells Untransduced CER - 1236 No T cells Untra

  26. Slide 26: CER-T Cells Eliminated Lymphoma Xenografts In Vivo

    CER - T Cells Eliminated Lymphoma Xenografts In Vivo A Single Infusion of CER - 1236 T Cells Single infusion of 2.5e^6 CER - 1236 T cells Eliminated TP53 mutant MCL tumors Observed improvements in survival without evidence for toxicity 0 40 10 4 10 5 10 6 10 7 10 8 10 9 10 10 20 Day post T cell infu

  27. Slide 27: No Safety Signals in Small Animal Tumor Models

    CER - 1236 T Cells Have Not Elicited Safety Signals in Small Animal Tumor Models 27 Single infusion of 7.5e^6 CER - 1236 T cells NO anemia, thrombocytopenia, neutropenia, or coagulation abnormalities NO weight loss, morbidity, unexpected mortality NO histological abnormalities across organs A Single

  28. Slide 28: CER-1236 T Cells Rapidly Proliferated, No Premature Exhaustion

    CER - 1236 T Cells Rapidly Proliferated and Showed No Premature Exhaustion 28 A Single Infusion of CER - 1236 T Cells Rapid Cell Expansion Repeat Antigen Stimulation Shows No Exhaustion Single infusion of 7.5e^6 CER - 1236 T cells Copy/ul Blood Day 20000 15000 10000 5000 Repeat antigen stimulation s

  29. Slide 29: Building on Success, Poised for Translation

    Building on Success, Poised for Translation • CER receptor humanization, molecular optimization, ICD testing, receptor stability screening, promoter selection, vector backbone harmonization, lead selection • Mechanism of action studies • Solid and Hematological animal modeling, pharmacokinetics, pha

  30. Slide 30: Unique and Singular Strategic Positioning

    Unique and Singular Strategic Positioning Killing Capability Starting Cell Source T cells / Lymphocytes Macrophages / Monocytes Phagocytosis Lysis PHAGOCYTOSIS + LYSIS 30 PHAGOCYTOSIS

  31. Slide 31: Patent Portfolio Overview

    • 11 US pending patent applications and 1 issued US application, 1 allowed • 29 pending foreign applications and 7 granted foreign applications in first family • Will continue to monitor and prosecute strategically • Key application already allowed with protection out to 2038 • Cancer agnostic • Fav

  32. Slide 32: Plug and Play Manufacturing

    Plug and Play Manufacturing GMP - ready process Experienced CDMO partner in place Currently transferring process Optimal product characteristics Completed Pre - IND review (preclinical and CMC) with FDA Process is analogous to CAR - T Cell 32

  33. Slide 33: Clinical Grade GMP-Ready Manufacturing Process

    29.6% 10.4% 28.4% 52.9% 23.6% 33.3% 18.3% 3.5% 0% 25% 50% 75% 100% D0 D7 Teff /CD3+ Tem /CD3+ Tcm /CD3+ Tnaive /CD3+ 33 Run ID Viability CER+ % IFNγ (pg/mL) CERo - 002 84.6 79.3 9821.6 CERo - 005 90.9 86.5 18554.9 CERo - 006 91.1 80 11056.3 CERo - 007 90.5 79.1 4992.4 CERo - 008 89.9 81 12948.1 CERo

  34. Slide 34: Positioned for Phase I Success

    Positioned for Phase I Success Deep preclinical data set, novel mechanism of action, clinical history with CAR - T Adaptive Phase I design: explore patient response in step - wise protocol, maximize opportunity to elicit clinical signal while evaluating safety Determine dose, conditioning therapy re

  35. Slide 35: Clinical Strategy

    Clinical Strategy Follow the Data – Preclinical Observations and Insights • Different MOA – Phagocytosis and Lysis • Extensive prevalence of naturally elevated Phosphatidylserine (PS) across diverse cancer types • CER - 1236 preclinical activity in multiple liquid and solid tumor types, including un

  36. Slide 36: IND Approach

    • Expected initial IND submission - safety first and efficient patient recruitment (e.g., completion within 12 months of IND) • Initially, AML patients, high - risk MDS, and “all - comer” Salvage B cell Lymphoma • With initial dose established, focus down on r/r AML, high - risk MDS • AML Monotherap

  37. Slide 37: Phase I trial design: CER-1236 lymphodepletion and infusion

    CER - 1236 Lymphodepletion with Fludarabine/Cyclophosphamide Lymphodepletion • Cyclophosphamide • Fludarabine CER - 1236 Manufacturing Screening Enrollment/Leukapheresis CER 1236 Infusion Efficacy Assessment • Based on standard criteria DLT Observation Safety Evaluation Day 28 Months 2 - 12 Disease

  38. Slide 38: Quarterly Budget ($Thousands)

    2 Year Budget 38 ($Thousands) 2023 2024 2025 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Q4 Q1 Q2 Q3 Starting Balance 40,000 32,699 28,914 22,962 18,447 13,500 8,500 3,077 Cash for Operations (1,503) (3,913) (6,041) (4,774) (5,132) (5,135) (5,507) (2,852) Deal Payments (6,198) − − − − − − − CAPEX − (200) (200) − − − − − Interest I

  39. Slide 39: Investment Highlights

    Investment Highlights CERo ‘reverse merge’ into Phoenix Biotech Acquisition Corp. (“PBAX”) 39 • Raising $40M to file IND, conduct human clinical data in several tumor types • $15M from insiders and PBAX • Remainder from new investors • Sponsor willing to share up to two - thirds of “promote” shares

  40. Slide 40: Transaction Summary

    Transaction Summary 40 SOURCES ($ in Millions) CERo Rollover $50.0 Cash in Trust 7.5 Proceeds from PIPE 32.5 Total $90.0 USES ($ in Millions) Equity to CERo $50.0 Cash to Balance Sheet 32.5 Est. Transaction Expenses 7.5 Total $90.0 Pro Forma Shares Outstanding (M) (1) Share Price ($) 14.5 $10.0 Deal

  41. Slide 41: The Next Era in Cell Therapy

    The Next Era in Cell Therapy Designed to Be a More Powerful Cancer Cell Killer UNIQUE APPROACH Powerful, multi - modal tumor clearing NEAR TERM VALUE IND anticipated in 12 months, human data in 24 months PROVEN SUCCESS Experienced team, top investors, and capital efficient LARGE OPPORTUNITY Targetin

  42. Slide 42: Summary Risk Factors

    Summary Risk Factors 42 All references to “we,” “us,” “our” and the “Company” refer to the business and operations of CERo Therapeutics, Inc . (“CERo”) prior to the consummation of the proposed Business Combination (as defined below) or to the business and operations of New CERo (as defined below) f

  43. Slide 43: Risk factors: growth and financing

    43 We have grown rapidly and will need to continue to grow the size of our organization, and we may experience difficulties in managing this growth. We may form or seek additional strategic alliances or enter into additional licensing arrangements in the future, and we may not realize the benefits o

  44. Slide 44: Risk factors: orphan drug, privacy and healthcare reform

    44 We may not be able to obtain orphan drug exclusivity for one or more of our product candidates, and even if we do, that exclusivity may not prevent the FDA from approving other competing products. We are subject to stringent and changing privacy laws, regulations and standards as well as policies

  45. Slide 45: Risks Related to New CERo's Common Stock

    Risks Related to New CERo’s Common Stock 45 An active trading market for New Cero’s common stock, may not be available on a consistent basis to provide stockholders with adequate liquidity. The price of the New Cero common stock may be extremely volatile, and stockholders could lose all or part of t

  46. Slide 46: Risks Related to the Business Combination

    46 There is no guarantee that a stockholder’s decision to continue to hold Class A Common Stock will put the stockholder in a better future economic position than if they decided to redeem their Class A Common Stock for a pro rata portion of the Trust Account will put the stockholder in a better fut

Phoenix Biotech Acquisition — SPAC Merger (August 2023) on 6ix