Infant Bacterial Therapeutics Ab Class B · OMXSTO:IBT_B

Infant Bacterial Therapeutics Ab Class B — Investor Presentation (December 2017)

61 slides from Infant Bacterial Therapeutics Ab Class B's investor presentation, December 2017

  1. Slide 1: Infant Bacterial Therapeutics Corporate Presentation

    Infant Bacterial Therapeutics Corporate Presentation December2017 1

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer You must read the following before continuing. The following applies to this document and the information provided in this presentation by Infant Bacterial Therapeutics AB (publ) (the “Company”) or any person on behalf of the Company and any other material distributed or statements made i

  3. Slide 3: Overview

    Infant Bacterial Therapeutics Overview History Current Future n Pharmaceutical microbiome n Orphan Drug Designation from FDA n Label Patient Population 56,000 company focused on areas of and EMA children in US and 108,000 in EU5 unmet medical need with third party assessed n Rare Pediatric Disease D

  4. Slide 4: Periods

    Periods week nr{1 [2] 3] 4]5 [6] 7] 8 | 9] 10] 11] 12]13[14] 15] 16] 17] 18/19] 20] 21122] 23[ 24] 25] 26] 27] 28[ 29] 30] 31] 32] 33[34] 35] 36] 37] 38] 39] 40] 41] 42] 43] 44] 45] ae Month nr. 1 L 2 | 3 | 4 5 6 | 7 I 8 9 | 10 Birth 50% survival classification

  5. Slide 5: Lead drug candidate IBP-9414 to prevent necrotizing enterocolitis

    Lead drug candidate IBP-9414, to prophylactically prevent necrotizing enterocolitis (“NEC”), a fatal, rare disease that afflicts premature infants Label Patient Population 56,000 children in US estimated up to USD 350m per year in US market for IBP-9414 Market Approval for IBP-9414 target 2020 / 202

  6. Slide 6: The IBT concept

    The IBT concept n IBT focuses on concepts of altering the human microbiome to prevent or treat diseases n Microbiome of the newborn infant is more dynamic than that of the mature human n Utilize co-evolved human bacterial strains derived from human breast milk n Clinical proof-of-concept signal publ

  7. Slide 7: Financial Highlights

    Financial Highlights n IBT B shares listed on Nasdaq First North Premier Shareholders on September 29, 2017 (BBG Ticker: IBTB:FN) Owner name A Shares B Shares Cap % Vote % n Cash ca SEK67m Annwall and Rothschild n Over 5,000 shareholders 222,198 241,458 8.4% 32.8% Investments AB n Application to Nas

  8. Slide 8: Key IBT people and collaborators

    Key IBT people and collaborators Extensive experience and collaboration with tier 1 institutions Key IBT decision makers Extensive KOL collaboration network n Group President and founder of BioGaia Peter Rothschild, MBA Alexandre Lapillonne, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, Paris, France n Managin

  9. Slide 9: IBP-9414 for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis

    IBP-9414 for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis 1 NEC HIGH UNMET MEDICAL NEED 2 5 MECHANISM OF SAFETY PROFILE ACTION Safe and well L. reuteri for the tolerated prevention of NEC 6 9 ESTABLISHED PRIORITY CONTROLLED REVIEW DRUG VOUCHER PRODUCTION IBT has the 3 4 eligibility at MA EFFICACY IBP

  10. Slide 10: 1. Necrotizing enterocolitis, a high unmet medical need

    1. Necrotizing enterocolitis, a high unmet medical need 10

  11. Slide 11: Necrotizing Enterocolitis

    Necrotizing Enterocolitis NEC is a severe inflammation and necrosis of the preterm infant bowel True unmet medical need • There is no therapy available today • 20-40% need complicated and costly surgery • One of the leading causes of death in NICU • Up to 40% death rate, 1500 US and 3700 EU infants

  12. Slide 12: Who gets NEC?

    Who gets NEC? Infants birth NEC incidence NEC mortality Mortality (% of weight rate (%) rate (%) weight cohort) 501-750g 12.0% 42.0% 5.0% High incidence 751-1,000g 9.2% 29.4% 2.7% and mortality 1,001-1250g 5.7% 21.3% 1.2% 1,251-1,500g 3.3% 15.9% 0.5% 1,501-2,500g 0.4% 8.2-17% 0.03-0.06% >2,500g 0.1%

  13. Slide 13: Short and long term burden of NEC

    Short and long term burden of NEC NEC exposes the baby to severe consequences NEC short term consequences NEC long term consequences § Highly complicated and intensive § Number one cause of short-bowel medical management syndrome § Risk of emergency surgery § Prolonged parenteral nutrition with § Ex

  14. Slide 14: Short and long term economic burden of NEC

    Short and long term economic burden of NEC Healthcare cost for premature infants with NEC and matched control groups NICU cost in the US Cost continues after NICU discharge Cost at discharge $444 000 Accumulated cost between 6-36 months $227 0 $135 300 00 $23 700 No NEC Surgical NEC No NEC Surgical

  15. Slide 15: Target population

    Target population A preventive therapy for all preterm infants at risk of NEC Current clinical NEC progression Target label population 100 premature infants (751-1,000g) Based on the expected IBP-9414 drug label, the targeted annual label population is: 9 NEC cases n US: 56,000 premature infants (≤1

  16. Slide 16: 2. Mechanism of action – Lactobacillus reuteri for the prevention of NEC

    2. MECHANISM OF ACTION –Lactobacillus reuteri for the prevention of NEC 16

  17. Slide 17: 17

    17

  18. Slide 18: Lactobacillus reuteri

    Lactobacillus reuteri Active substance of IBP-9414 Lactobacillus reuteri (orange) Lactobacillus reuteri present adhering to intestinal mucus on women’s breasts Picture with the permission Versalovic 18

  19. Slide 19: Evolutionary adaptation of L. reuteri to the human gut

    Evolutionary adaptation of L. reuteri to the human gut Figure 1 AFLP analysis of a global collection of Lactobacillus reuteri strains from humans, Host Poultry Human Porcine Rodents Genetic relatedness of global L. reuteri genomes 0.02 Evolution of the gut symbiont L. reuteri PL Oh et al C ii B D E

  20. Slide 20: L. reuteri an ideal candidate for NEC

    L. reuteri an ideal candidate for NEC L. reuteri has strain-specific attributes which affect the NEC pathogenesis Major processes involved in NEC L. reuteri strain-specific benefits Dysbiosis Anti-pathogen effects Improvement of gut Impaired gut motility motility Unregulated Anti-inflammatory Inflam

  21. Slide 21: Dysbiosis in NEC

    Dysbiosis in NEC Dysbiosis with pathogen blooms in the microbiota can contribute to necrotizing enterocolitis in preterm infants A NEC Cases Controls Controls 100 Gammaproteobacteria Bacilli Clostridia 90 Negativicutes 80 70 Proportion of reads (%) 60 50 40 30 20 10 0 1–15 16–30 31–45* 46–60† 1–15 1

  22. Slide 22: Anti-pathogen effects in vitro

    Anti-pathogen effects in vitro L. reuteri produces species-specific antimicrobial substance called reuterin Bacteria § Bacillus subtilis § Escherichia coli (patogena) § Listeria monocytogenes § Salmonella typhimurium § Campylobacter jejuni § Enterobacter sakazakii § Porphyromonas gingivalis § Shigel

  23. Slide 23: Anti-pathogen effects in infants

    Anti-pathogen effects in infants Infant fecal pathogens after 1 month L. reuteri treatment 18 * Number of positive feces samples for identified pathogens from 30 infants 16 L. reuteri group n= 30 Control group n=30 14 * P≤0.05 12 10 * 8 6 4 2 0 Diarrheagenic Salmonella Cronobacter Hafinia alvei Kleb

  24. Slide 24: Impaired gut motility in NEC

    Impaired gut motility in NEC Poor gastrointestinal motility is associated with NEC Term infant healthy gut motility Movement Movement Premature infant impaired gut motility Standstill Increased risk of accumulation of noxious substances which can cause intestinal damage Source Lin et al, 2008 24

  25. Slide 25: L. reuteri improves gut motility ex vivo

    A 80 ** B 4 ** C 10 15 ns A 100 (mm s–1(mm PPr (hPa 60 (mHz) ( (mHz) ( L. reuteri improves gut motility ex vivo Frequency Frequency 40 2 ) 80 60 3 40 VelocityVelocity 5 10 PPr (hPa) 20 1 60 20 Frequency Frequency Spatiotemporal mapping of mouse gut motility 40 2 40 0 0 0 5 0 20 1 20 Kr s SM s SM s S

  26. Slide 26: Modulation of gut motility in preterm infants

    Modulation of gut motility in preterm infants Fasting antral area Regurgitation * * P≤0.05 * No. of episodes of regurgitation Formula Formula Gastric emptying Stooling + L. reuteri + placebo * * No. of episodes of evacuations Formula Formula + L. reuteri + placebo Preterm infants given L. reuteri sh

  27. Slide 27: Excessive inflammation in NEC

    Excessive inflammation in NEC Toll-like receptors (TLR4) IEC ⚡ ⚡ ⚡ ⚡ Teff Teff cells Treg Treg DC cells FoxP 3 Mphage Inflammatory cytokines Teff Teff Treg FoxP3 Teff Teff Anti- Teff inflammatory cytokines 27

  28. Slide 28: Anti-inflammation in NEC

    Anti-inflammation in NEC L. reuteri reduces inflammation Toll-like Receptors (TLR4) IEC ⚡ Teff Teff cells Treg Treg DC cells FoxP 3 Mphage Inflammatory Treg cytokines Teff FoxP3 Treg Treg FoxP3 Anti- FoxP3 inflammatory cytokines Source Liu 2010, Liu 2012, Liu 2014 28

  29. Slide 29: Anti-inflammation in NEC animal model

    We examined the effects of human-derived probiotic L. reuteri strains DSM 17938 and ATCC PTA 4659 on experimental NEC. Anti-inflammation in NEC animal model Our hypothesis was that different strains would differ in their anti-inflammatory effects in this disease. Previous studies from our laboratory

  30. Slide 30: Strain specific anti-inflammation in NEC animal model

    Strain specific anti-inflammation in NEC animal model L. reuteri DSM 17938 AFFECTS EFFECTOR/MEMORY T AND Tr Treg Teff FoxP3 Treg cell modulation Teff cell modulation L. reuteri L. acidophilus L. reuteri L. acidophilus A B Fig. 4. LR17938 reversed frequency of CD4!Foxp3! regulatory Fig. 6. LR17938 T

  31. Slide 31: Anti-inflammatory in infants

    Anti-inflammatory in infants Treg cells increase in infant blood after L. reuteri administration Treg 60 * P≤0.05 FoxP3 50 * FOXP3 mRNA levels 40 30 20 10 Placebo 0 L. reuteri -10 -20 L. reuteri recruitment of Treg cells now shown in infants Source Savino 2017 31

  32. Slide 32: Protection against NEC in animal models

    Protection against NEC in animal models L. reuteri increases survival reproducibly in NEC model L. reuteri reduces NEC in rodent models Source Liu, 2012 & Liu 2013 (rat), Liu 2014 (mouse) 32

  33. Slide 33: 3. Efficacy signal – L. reuteri has shown strong clinical signal in prevention of NEC

    3. EFFICACY SIGNAL – L. reuteri has shown strong clinical signal in the prevention of NEC 33

  34. Slide 34: Clear clinical signal (1/3)

    Clear clinical signal (1/3) Randomised double-blind placebo-controlled clinical studies indicate reduction of NEC 1 Rojas et al. (2012) 2 Oncel et. al (2014) n Determine whether prophylactic administration of n Evaluate the effect of administration of L. reuteri L. reuteri to pre-term infants reduce

  35. Slide 35: Clear clinical signal (2/3)

    Clear clinical signal (2/3) Retrospective cohort clinical studies indicate reduction of NEC 3 Hunter et al. (2012) & Dimaguila et al. (2013) 4 Jerkovic Raguz et al. (2016) n Examine the potential benefit of administering L. n Analyse the treatment, course and outcome of Aim of the study reuteri on t

  36. Slide 36: Clear clinical signal (3/3)

    Clear clinical signal (3/3) Other studies indicating reduction of NEC 5 Shadkam et al. (2015) 6 Hernandez-Enriquez et al. (2016) n Evaluate the effects of Lactobacillus reuteri on n Evaluate the effectiveness of the use of Aim of the study the gastrointestinal complications and feeding Lactobacillus

  37. Slide 37: Clear efficacy signal from L. reuteri

    Clear efficacy signal from L. reuteri All studies show clinically significant reduction of NEC Study Number of patients Reduction in NEC incidence n 40% in the total study population Rojas et al. (2012) n 750 patients n 37% in infants ≤1,500g n 20% in the total study population Oncel et al. (2014) n

  38. Slide 38: 4. Plan endorsed by stakeholders – Regulatory agencies and KOLs

    4. PLAN ENDORSED BY STAKEHOLDERS – Regulatory agencies and KOLs 38

  39. Slide 39: Network of KOLs

    Network of KOLs IBT has developed IBP-9414 program with deep considerations of KOLs experience and clinical practice Some of the external participants Aideen Moore, The Hospital for Sick Children, Toronto, Canada. Key Opinion Leader Meetings Alexandre Lapillonne, Necker Hospital for Sick Children, P

  40. Slide 40: Regulatory achievements

    Regulatory achievements IBT has had close interaction with regulatory agencies on the IBP-9414 development program FDA ✅ Sep-13: pre-IND type B FDA meeting ✅ Aug-13: FDA approval of Orphan Drug Designation ✅ Dec-15: IND becomes effective ✅ Mar-16: FDA grants Rare Pediatric Disease product status EMA

  41. Slide 41: IBP-9414 – development plan

    IBP-9414 – development plan A development program consisting of two clinical trials developed according to advice from regulators and KOLs Drug development plan 2016 2017 2018 2019 Safety and tolerability trial n A randomized, double blind, parallel-group, dose escalation placebo-controlled multicen

  42. Slide 42: 5. Safety profile – IBP-9414 safe and well-tolerated in preterm infants

    5. SAFETY PROFILE – IBP-9414 a safe and well-tolerated in preterm infants 42

  43. Slide 43: IBP-9414 Safety and Tolerability study

    IBP-9414 Safety and Tolerability study Careful design with interim safety evaluations 30 patients/cohort Cohort A (1001-2000g) Scientific advice by FDA and EMA Low dose 1st DSMB • Double-blind, Cohort B (1001-2000g) randomised, Minimal disturbance to High dose placebo controlled the vulnerable patie

  44. Slide 44: IBP-9414 Safety and Tolerability study

    IBP-9414 Safety and Tolerability study A randomized double blind, parallel-group, dose escalation placebo-controlled multicenter study to investigate the safety and tolerability of IBP-9414 administered in preterm infants 120 patients 2 weight cohorts 2 doses 15 US sites Neu, Gainesville FL, PI Del

  45. Slide 45: IBP-9414 Safety and Tolerability study

    IBP-9414 Safety and Tolerability study Results § Recruitment rate was higher than estimated without a difference between big and small babies § Demographics of the study was representative of the target population § Similar AE and SAE profile between active and placebo groups § No SAE related to stu

  46. Slide 46: 6. Established controlled pharmaceutical production

    6. ESTABLISHED CONTROLLED PHARMACEUTICAL PRODUCTION 46

  47. Slide 47: Why product quality is important?

    Why product quality is important? The Solgar incident October 2014 November 2014 December 2014 Consequences n A premature infant n Solgar issued a n FDA/CDC warning n Pressure to conform given a Solgar voluntary recall of letter issued to FDA’s rigorous product (ABC the product standards due to risk

  48. Slide 48: Manufacturing Process of IBP-9414

    Manufacturing Process of IBP-9414 Stringent control of manufacturing environment Cell Bank Filling Pre-culture Freeze-drying Fermentation Packaging & Labelling Filtration IBP-9414 powder for oral suspension Mixing Formulated Cell Suspension 48

  49. Slide 49: 7. Multi-layer protection on the market

    7. MULTI-LAYER PROTECTION on the market 49

  50. Slide 50: IBP-9414 Market Exclusivity

    IBP-9414 Market Exclusivity Three layers of protection MA* 2013 2016 2020 2030 2035 EU Granted Patent Patent Protection SPC 5y + .5y pedia US Granted Patent PTE 3y + 0,5y pedia Bill A2041 Patent Application Pending Orphan Drug EU Orphan Drug Designation Orphan Drug Exclusivity 10y + 2y pedia US Orph

  51. Slide 51: 8. Strong interest from the market

    8. STRONG INTEREST FROM THE MARKET 51

  52. Slide 52: IBP-9414 Target Product Profile

    IBP-9414 Target Product Profile For the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis n Pharmaceutical therapy approved as Orphan Drug in EU and US to prevent NEC Product description n The first FDA and EMA-approved drug product to prevent NEC Route of n Oral / enteral Administration n Demonstrates 33% re

  53. Slide 53: Neonatologists show high willingness to prescribe IBP-9414

    Neonatologists show high willingness to prescribe IBP-9414 Clearview US market research indicates an overall 78% physician preference share reflecting a high unmet medical need <1,000 g Infants 1,000 – 1,500 g Infants Physician Preference Share Physician Preference Share ~40% ~90% ~70% (%) ~60% (%)

  54. Slide 54: Treatment up to 34 weeks

    Treatment up to 34 weeks 1000 – 1,500 g ~3.4 Infants Weeks <1,000 g ~7.8 Infants Weeks 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 Gestational Age (Weeks) Physicians expected to halt IBP-9414 treatment once infants had reached 32 to 34 weeks postmenstrual age 54

  55. Slide 55: Expected Formulary Inclusion by Institution Type

    Expected Formulary Inclusion by Institution Type In the United States, high adoption in hospitals is anticipated in institutions which have the biggest share of premature infants Small Community Institution Type Major Medical Centers Medium Hospitals Hospitals Share of Premature ~60% ~30% ~10% Infan

  56. Slide 56: Market potential for IBP-9414 assessment

    Market potential for IBP-9414 assessment IBT has mandated consultants to assess the market opportunity… n Including 60 Neonatology Key Opinion Leaders interviews …who have interviewed the relevant key stakeholders n 15 Pharmacy and Therapeutics neonatologists and pharmacists (P&T members) across US

  57. Slide 57: Global preterm births

    Global preterm births 15 Million preterm births annually USA 3,5% Rest of the World 96,5% Source H. Blencowe et al. 2012 57

  58. Slide 58: 9. Priority Review Voucher

    9. PRIORITY REVIEW VOUCHER 58

  59. Slide 59: IBP-9414's eligibility for a Priority Review Voucher

    IBP-9414’s eligibility for a Priority Review Voucher § FDA granted Rare Pediatric Disease product status to IBT for IBP-9414, this means that IBT should be awarded a priority review voucher at the time of approval § This voucher is transferrable and cannot expire, 16 vouchers awarded to date § Previ

  60. Slide 60: IBP-9414 for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis

    IBP-9414 for the prevention of necrotizing enterocolitis IBP-9414 is based on all relevant pillars 2. MECHANISM OF for the development of a successful drug ACTION L. reuteri for the prevention of NEC 1. NEC: HIGH UNMET MEDICAL NEED 3. EFFICACY SIGNAL n Medical need ✔ 6 independent clinical No curren

  61. Slide 61: Thank you!

    Thank you! Visit us in Stockholm, Sweden Infant Bacterial Therapeutics AB Bryggargatan 10 www.ibtherapeutics.com ☏: +46 (0) 8 410 145 55 info@ibtherapeutics.com 61

Infant Bacterial Therapeutics — Investor Presentation (December 2017) on 6ix