Bioage Labs, Inc. · NASDAQ:BIOA

Bioage Labs — Investor Day (May 2026)

106 slides from Bioage Labs's investor day presentation, May 8, 2026

  1. Slide 1: R&D Update May 8, 2026

    BIOAGE R&D Update May 8, 2026

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer BioAge Labs, Inc. (the “Company”) does not (nor their respective affiliates, directors, members, officers, employees or agents) make any representation or warranty, express or implied, as to, and no reliance should be placed on, the fairness, accuracy, completeness or correctness of the i

  3. Slide 3: Welcome & Introductions

    ~ € welcome & Introductions > ee . ea

  4. Slide 4: Management attendees

    Management attendees Kristen Fortney, PhD Paul Rubin, MD Dov Goldstein, MD, MBA Co-Founder & CEO CMO & EVP Research CFO

  5. Slide 5: Guest presenters

    Guest presenters Michael Davidson, MD Matthias Geyer, PhD Clinical Professor of Medicine Director, Institute of Structural Director, Lipid Clinic Biology University of Bonn University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine Brian Hafler, MD, PhD David Boyer, MD Associate Professor Senior Partner Opht

  6. Slide 6: Agenda

    Kristen Fortney, PhD Introduction Co-Founder & CEO BGE-102 Matthias Geyer, PhD Structural biology insights University of Bonn Paul Rubin, MD Phase 1 results CMO & EVP Research Michael Davidson, MD Cardiovascular University of Chicago Paul Rubin, MD Brian Hafler, MD, PhD David Boyer, MD Ophthalmology

  7. Slide 7: Introduction

    Introduction Kristen Fortney, PhD Co-Founder & CEO

  8. Slide 8: We are harnessing the biology of human aging to develop new therapies

    The BioAge discovery platform: from human data to therapeutics for metabolic aging Validated platform: ongoing partnerships with Novartis & Lilly to discover drugs and drug targets >150M molecular data points: one of the world’s largest collections of longitudinal We are human aging data and functio

  9. Slide 9: Chronic NLRP3 activity drives disease & predicts poor human longevity

    Chronic NLRP3 activity drives disease & predicts poor human longevity NLRP3 overview NLRP3 in human longevity & disease Relative mortality risk (HR) Reduced NLRP3 Normal NLRP3 Excess ● nutrients Cellular activity is stress function: innate associated with immune response to longevity danger signals

  10. Slide 10: BGE-102 well positioned to address diseases driven by inflammation

    Our lead program, BGE-102, is well positioned to address diseases driven by inflammation in both the CNS and the periphery Key attributes Potential best-in-class potency based on Phase 1 trial results CNS penetrant 1.8 nM IC90 by human ex vivo whole blood stimulation ~0.7 Kp,uuCSF (120 mg MAD, day 1

  11. Slide 11: BioAge NLRP3 inhibitors: unique, patented binding site & novel mechanism

    BioAge NLRP3 inhibitors: unique, patented binding site & novel mechanism Unique binding site Our inhibitors bind both the active & inactive inflammasome, unlike other NLRP3 inhibitors BioAge compounds MCC950 Inactive decamer Active inflammasome Collaboration with Matthias Geyer, PhD, Director, Insti

  12. Slide 12: NLRP3 Structural biology insights

    NLRP3 Structural biology insights Phase 1 results Cardiovascular Ophthalmology

  13. Slide 13: A new way to inhibit NLRP3

    Matthias Geyer, PhD A new way to Director, Institute of Structural Biology inhibit NLRP3 University of Bonn

  14. Slide 14: BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors

    BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors in development

  15. Slide 15: BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors

    BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors in development

  16. Slide 16: BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors

    BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors in development

  17. Slide 17: BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors

    BGE-102 targets a different site on NLRP3 than other inhibitors in development

  18. Slide 18: BGE-102 inhibits both forms of NLRP3

    BGE-102 inhibits both forms of NLRP3 – the resting state and the active inflammasome

  19. Slide 19: BGE-102 inhibits both forms of NLRP3

    BGE-102 inhibits both forms of NLRP3 – the resting state and the active inflammasome

  20. Slide 20: BGE-102 is selective for NLRP3

    BGE-102 is selective for NLRP3 There are 22 human NOD-like receptors

  21. Slide 21: BGE-102 is selective for NLRP3

    BGE-102 is selective for NLRP3 The BioAge compound binding site is in pocket of NLRP3 that is different from every other inflammasome

  22. Slide 22: BGE-102 is selective for NLRP3

    BGE-102 is selective for NLRP3 The BioAge compound binding site is in pocket of NLRP3 that is different from every other inflammasome NLRP3 NLRP12

  23. Slide 23: Three structural features set BGE-102 apart

    Three structural features set BGE-102 apart The BGE-102 binding site on NLRP3 is unique from every other inhibitor in the clinic

  24. Slide 24: Three structural features set BGE-102 apart

    Three structural features set BGE-102 apart The BGE-102 binding site on NLRP3 is unique from every other inhibitor in the clinic The BGE-102 binding site is accessible in the resting and active state of NLRP3

  25. Slide 25: Three structural features set BGE-102 apart

    Three structural features set BGE-102 apart The BGE-102 binding site on NLRP3 is unique from every other inhibitor in the clinic The BGE-102 binding site is accessible in the resting and active state of NLRP3 The BGE-102 binding site is selective for NLRP3 alone within the inflammasome family

  26. Slide 26: Phase 1 results

    NLRP3 Structural biology insights Phase 1 results Cardiovascular Paul Rubin, MD CMO & EVP Research Ophthalmology

  27. Slide 27: Phase 1 clinical trial design

    P3 LR N PHASE 1 RESULTS Phase 1 clinical trial design Single Ascending Dose Multiple Ascending Dose Multiple Ascending Dose HVs & obese HVs - 14 days of dosing Obese - 14-21 days of dosing Objectives Safety & tolerability, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics (IL-1β, hsCRP) HVs (N=36) Obese subjects S

  28. Slide 28: BGE-102 met key trial objectives

    P3 LR N PHASE 1 RESULTS BGE-102 met key trial objectives ● Well tolerated with all mild / moderate, self-limited AEs Safety / tolerability ● No dose-limiting toxicities Pharmacokinetics ● Dose-proportional exposure with T1/2 supporting QD dosing After 14 days of dosing at 60 mg QD in healthy volunte

  29. Slide 29: BGE-102 was well tolerated

    P3 LR N PHASE 1 RESULTS BGE-102 was well tolerated ● Only mild / moderate treatment-emergent AEs All BGE-102 All placebo TEAEs (TEAEs); all self-limited with no dose dependency (N=82) (N=22) Subjects with No serious AEs 50 (61.0%) 13 (59.1%) ● at least 1 AE No TEAEs leading to discontinuation Subjec

  30. Slide 30: Obese MAD cohorts: baseline characteristics

    P3 LR N PHASE 1 RESULTS Obese MAD cohorts: baseline characteristics 60 mg obese MAD 120 mg obese MAD Obese placebo Baseline characteristic (N=19) (N=14) (N=8) Age, years, mean (SD) 41.7 (9.8) 39.4 (9.8) 38.8 (6.7) Male, n (%) 7 (36.8) 8 (57.1) 2 (25.0) Female, n (%) 12 (63.2) 6 (42.9) 6 (75.0) Race,

  31. Slide 31: Obese MAD cohorts: safety and tolerability

    P3 LR N PHASE 1 RESULTS Obese MAD cohorts: safety and tolerability 60 mg obese MAD 120 mg obese MAD Obese placebo TEAEs (N=19) (N=14) (N=8) Subjects with any related TEAE, n (%) 5 (26.3%) 2 (14.3%) 1 (12.5%) Subjects with TEAE leading to discontinuation, n 0 0 0 Subjects with SAE or severe TEAE, n 0

  32. Slide 32: Healthy volunteer SAD / MAD

    NLRP3 Structural biology insights Phase 1 results Healthy volunteer SAD / MAD Obese MAD Cardiovascular Ophthalmology

  33. Slide 33: Plasma PK: dose-proportionality observed in SAD cohorts

    P3 LR N HEALTHY VOLUNTEER SAD / MAD Plasma PK: dose-proportionality observed in SAD cohorts SAD cohorts: mean plasma PK BGE-102 and active metabolite* free concentration Mean free plasma concentration Dose (ng/mL) 10 mg 30 mg 60 mg 120 mg Time (h) Note: * combined concentration of BGE-102 and its so

  34. Slide 34: Plasma PK: MAD cohorts showed accumulation

    P3 LR N HEALTHY VOLUNTEER SAD / MAD Plasma PK: MAD cohorts showed accumulation out to 14 days with near steady-state levels above the human IC90 for IL-1β inhibition MAD cohorts: mean plasma PK at trough (pre-dose) Mean free plasma concentration BGE-102 and active metabolite free concentration Dose

  35. Slide 35: CSF PK: doses exceeded human IC90

    P3 LR N HEALTHY VOLUNTEER SAD / MAD CSF PK: doses of 60 mg and above exceeded human IC90 at near steady state MAD cohorts: Day 14 CSF PK BGE-102 and active metabolite, 11-13 hours post-dose Mean CSF concentration (ng/mL) IL-1β IC90 Human ex vivo whole blood 60 mg 120 mg

  36. Slide 36: PK / PD: 90-98% suppression of IL-1β at trough

    P3 LR N HEALTHY VOLUNTEER SAD / MAD PK / PD: 90-98% suppression of IL-1β at BGE-102 trough in MAD cohorts MAD cohorts: mean IL-1β with ex vivo stimulation at trough Ex vivo whole blood stimulation baseline vs Day 14 Blood from Inflammatory participant stimulus 98% 90% IL-1β 60 mg 120 mg

  37. Slide 37: PK / PD: 24 hours of near-maximal suppression of IL-1β

    P3 LR N HEALTHY VOLUNTEER SAD / MAD PK / PD: 24 hours of near-maximal suppression of IL-1β achieved by Day 8 120 mg MAD Day 1 Day 8 Day 14

  38. Slide 38: Obese MAD

    NLRP3 Structural biology insights Phase 1 results Healthy volunteer SAD / MAD Obese MAD Cardiovascular Ophthalmology

  39. Slide 39: Phase 1 trial included 2 obese MAD cohorts

    P3 LR N OBESE MAD The Phase 1 trial included 2 obese MAD cohorts, enabling evaluation of biomarkers including hsCRP Eligibility ● Age 18+ Primary endpoints Placebo ● PK, safety / tolerability ● BMI 32-42 R Exploratory endpoints ● hsCRP > 3 mg/L BGE-102 Dose levels: 60 mg | 120 mg ● Inflammatory and

  40. Slide 40: 86% reductions in hsCRP

    P3 LR N OBESE MAD 60 mg & 120 mg doses of BGE-102 resulted in 86% reductions in hsCRP, consistent with best-in-class efficacy 60 mg MAD 120 mg MAD * Note: median values, error bars show IQR (Q1-Q3); * Day 7 placebo IQR upper limit is 115%; median baseline hsCRP 60 mg cohort 6.30 mg/L for both active

  41. Slide 41: Similar hsCRP trajectories in both obese MAD cohorts

    P3 LR N OBESE MAD Similar hsCRP trajectories in both obese MAD cohorts Dose 60 mg 120 mg Note: median values, error bars show IQR (Q1-Q3); median baseline hsCRP for subjects on active treatment 60 mg cohort 6.30 mg/L, 120 mg cohort 4.85 mg/L

  42. Slide 42: 87-93% of subjects achieved normal hsCRP levels

    P3 LR N OBESE MAD 87-93% of subjects on BGE-102 achieved normal hsCRP levels (<2 mg/L) 60 mg MAD 120 mg MAD Group / Threshold Placebo ≤1 mg/L Placebo <2 mg/L BGE-102 60 mg QD ≤1 mg/L BGE-102 60 mg QD <2 mg/L BGE-102 120 mg QD ≤1 mg/L BGE-102 120 mg QD <2 mg/L Note: median baseline hsCRP 60 mg cohort

  43. Slide 43: Comparable IL-6 reductions

    P3 LR N OBESE MAD 60 mg & 120 mg doses of BGE-102 resulted in comparable IL-6 reductions 60 mg MAD 120 mg MAD Note: median values, error bars show IQR (Q1-Q3); median baseline IL-6 60 mg cohort 2.2 pg/mL for active treatment and 2.8 pg/mL for placebo, 120 mg cohort 2.3 pg/mL for active treatment and

  44. Slide 44: BGE-102 reduced CSF IL-6 by 84% in elevated subjects

    P3 LR N OBESE MAD In the 2 subjects with elevated baseline CSF IL-6, BGE-102 reduced levels by 84% in the Day 14 CSF CSF IL-6* Plasma IL-6 Plasma IL-6 (pg/mL) CSF IL-6 (pg/mL) Note: * IL-6 levels >7 pg/mL in the CSF are considered elevated; corresponding decrease in the plasma was 62%; measurements

  45. Slide 45: Comparable reductions in fibrinogen

    P3 LR N OBESE MAD 60 mg & 120 mg doses of BGE-102 resulted in comparable reductions in fibrinogen 60 mg MAD 120 mg MAD Note: median values, error bars show IQR (Q1-Q3); median baseline fibrinogen 60 mg cohort 362 mg/dL for active treatment and 379 mg/dL for placebo, 120 mg cohort 331 mg/dL for activ

  46. Slide 46: Cardiovascular

    NLRP3 Structural biology insights Phase 1 results Cardiovascular Paul Rubin, MD CMO & EVP Research Ophthalmology

  47. Slide 47: BGE-102 could address cardiometabolic and neuroinflammatory disorders

    P3 LR N CARDIOVASCULAR BGE-102 has the potential to address a range of cardiometabolic and neuroinflammatory disorders BGE-102 addressable diseases Neurodegeneration Ocular Neuro- inflammation Peripheral inflammation CVD Insulin MASLD / (ASCVD, HF) resistance MASH

  48. Slide 48: The CV opportunity

    P3 LR N CARDIOVASCULAR The CV opportunity Lipid-lowering Inflammation is 15M addressable Orals are highly therapies set an independent patients in the US preferable precedent for large risk factor for CVD alone market hsCRP (mg/L) <1.0 1.0-3.0 >3.0 >80% of statins are prescribed by PCPs $50B ~60% ex

  49. Slide 49: Planned CV risk POC

    P3 LR N CARDIOVASCULAR Planned CV risk POC Primary endpoint ● % change in hsCRP Placebo N=40 Key secondary endpoints Key eligibility criteria ● % normalization of hsCRP ● Age 18+ (<2 mg/L and ≤1 mg/L) BGE-102 30 mg QD N=40 BMI 32-42 Exploratory endpoints ● R ● hsCRP > 3 mg/L ● Additional CV risk fac

  50. Slide 50: Anti-inflammatory strategies for ASCVD

    Anti-inflammatory Michael Davidson, MD Clinical Professor of Medicine strategies for ASCVD Director, Lipid Clinic University of Chicago Pritzker School of Medicine

  51. Slide 51: Role of inflammation in atherosclerosis?

    Role of inflammation in atherosclerosis? - A fierce debate started in the 19th century - Both observed cellular inflammatory changes in the atherosclerotic vessel walls Carl von Rokitansky Rudolf Virchow “Inflammation accompanies atherosclerosis” “Inflammation initiates atherosclerosis” Rolitansky;

  52. Slide 52: Chronic Inflammation is a Driver of Cardiovascular Risk

    Chronic Inflammation is a Driver of Cardiovascular Risk >2-fold increase in relative ~46% of patients with inflammation despite CV risk due to inflammation maximal lipid therapy (across 4 studies) 3 Relative Risk 2 1 0 Inflammation Inflammation Absent Present Adapted from 1998_ridker_Circulation Sou

  53. Slide 53: hsCRP and IL-6 predict MACE: STABILITY trial

    hsCRP and IL-6 predict MACE, CV Death, and Total Death: results from the STABILITY trial % of CHD patients with an event over MACE by baseline hsCRP quartile 3 years by baseline IL-6 quartile 14% 14% 12% 12% Patients with event, % Cumulative risk, % 10% 10% 8% 8% 6% 6% 4% 4% 2% 2% 0% 0%

  54. Slide 54: hsCRP more strongly associated with MACE than LDL and Lp(a)

    Emerging evidence suggests that hsCRP is more strongly associated with MACE than both LDL and Lp(a)

  55. Slide 55: Many CV disease patients have residual inflammatory risk

    Many CV disease patients have residual inflammatory risk

  56. Slide 56: Novel Targets for Reducing CRP for Atheroprotection

    Novel Targets for Reducing CRP for Atheroprotection Ziltivekimab Ridker et al Circ Res 2016;118:145-156.

  57. Slide 57: CANTOS trial design

    Canakinumab Anti-inflammatory Thrombosis Outcomes Study (CANTOS) Trial Design’ IL-1 is upstream of IL-6? Canakinumab 50 mg Q3M NLRP3 n=2,170 : Se inflammasome -}-—| BGE-102 + 10,061 patients Canakinumab 150 mg Q3M IL4B [-—Ceeanakinumab _) * Stable CAD (post Ml) n= 2,284 1 * On Statin, ACE/ARB, ——+ I

  58. Slide 58: CANTOS MACE results

    Placebo SC q 3 months Canakinumab 150/300 mg SC q 3 months MACE MACE - Plus HR 0.85 HR 0.83 Cumulative Incidence (%) Cumulative Incidence (%) 95%CI 0.76-0.96 95%CI 0.74-0.92 P = 0.007 P = 0.0006 0 1 2 3 4 5 Follow-up Years Follow-up Years 35 - 40% reductions in hsCRP and IL-6 No change in LDLC Ridke

  59. Slide 59: Achievement of CRP < 2.0mg/L and mortality reduction

    Achievement of CRP < 2.0mg/L Provide 50% reduction in Mortality if CANTOS like Responses can be Achieved in CVOT On-Treatment hsCRP On-Treatment IL-6 0.25 Placebo Placebo On-treatment hsCRP ≥ 2 mg/L On-treatment IL-6 ≥ median 0.20 On-treatment hsCRP < 2 mg/L On-treatment IL-6 < median 0.15 0.10 0.05

  60. Slide 60: Lessons from canakinumab

    Lessons from canakinumab: Robust reduction of inflammation through IL-1B has transformative potential for ASCVD

  61. Slide 61: Primary RESCUE End Point Achieved

    Primary RESCUE End Point Achieved Median Percent Change in hsCRP Median (Q1, Q3) hsCRP values (mg/L) at baseline, W13 and ET Time Ziltivekimab Placebo 7.5 mg 15 mg 30 mg 5.8 5.5 5.7 5.8 Baseline (3.3 ,9.9) (3.5 ,9.3) (3.5 ,8.1) (3.7 ,8.9) (N=66) (N=66) (N=66) (N=66) 5.1 1.0 0.6 0.5 W13 (3.4 ,9.2) (0

  62. Slide 62: Increasing Responder Rate with Increasing Dose of Zilti

    Increasing Responder Rate with Increasing Dose of Zilti Superior hsCRP Responder Rate Relative to Canakinumab in CANTOS hsCRP suppression >= 50% from baseline hsCRP suppression < 2 mg/L threshold hsCRP suppression >= 50% from baseline AND below 2mg/L

  63. Slide 63: Ziltivekimab Significantly Reduced Fibrinogen, SAA and Haptoglobin

    Ziltivekimab Significantly Reduced Fibrinogen, SAA and Haptoglobin Fibrinogen SAA Haptoglobin 0% N (W13)= 55, 55, 60, 54 N (W13)= 57, 58, 60, 56 N (W13)= 57, 58, 59, 55 N(ET)= 50, 50, 54, 52 N(ET)= 52, 52, 55, 52 N(ET)= 52, 52, 54, 52 A 100 mg/dL increase is associated 3.7 mg/L decrease with 15mg do

  64. Slide 64: Five Phase 3 CVOTs enrolling > 24,000 patients

    Five Phase 3 CVOTs enrolling > 24,000 patients

  65. Slide 65: NLRP3 inhibitors are a potential oral IL-6

    NLRP3 inhibitors are a potential “oral IL-6” 0% with comparable reductions in hsCRP NLRP3 IL-1β Inflammatory cascade & IL-6 targeting modalities -25% Maximum % change in hsCRP NLRP3 inflammasome IL-1β -50% IL-6 Canakinumab 300 mg | CANTOS, 12 weeks -75% VTX3232 30 mg QD | CV risk, 12 weeks NT-0796 2

  66. Slide 66: NLRP3 inhibition benefits beyond IL-6

    NLRP3 inhibition also has potential benefits beyond IL-6, reducing IL-18 & cell death that contribute to plaque destabilization NLRP3 drives ASCVD beyond IL-6 Baseline IL-18 is a CVD risk factor in the CANTOS trial NLRP3 inflammasome IL-1β IL-18 Pyroptosis IL-6 Plaque destabilization CRP Fibrinogen

  67. Slide 67: Ophthalmology

    NLRP3 Structural biology insights Phase 1 results Cardiovascular Paul Rubin, MD CMO & EVP Research Ophthalmology

  68. Slide 68: The retinal opportunity for BGE-102

    P3 LR N OPHTHALMOLOGY The retinal opportunity for BGE-102 Greater efficacy Oral treatment to lower with new MOA treatment burden Simultaneous treatment Ocular and systemic of bilateral disease biology addressed BGE-102 has shown therapeutic retinal exposure across species, including primates

  69. Slide 69: NLRP3 activation is central to retinal diseases DME & GA

    P3 LR N OPHTHALMOLOGY NLRP3 activation is a central feature of retinal diseases DME & GA Diabetic retinopathy / Dry age-related macular degeneration diabetic macular edema (DME) (AMD) / geographic atrophy (GA) hyperglycemia & oxidative stress accumulation of cellular debris (drusen, lipofuscin) and

  70. Slide 70: DME: oral BGE-102 preserved retinal vascular integrity in preclinical model

    P3 LR N OPHTHALMOLOGY DME: oral delivery of BGE-102 preserved retinal vascular integrity in a preclinical model of diabetic retinopathy Retinal vascular permeability Blood-retinal barrier integrity measured via fluorescein angiography claudin-5 IHC (endothelial tight junctions) Microvascular degener

  71. Slide 71: DME: BGE-102 improved insulin sensitivity in obese mice

    P3 LR N OPHTHALMOLOGY DME: BGE-102 improved insulin sensitivity in obese mice, recapitulating mouse genetics & establishing potential to treat the key disease driver BGE-102 Nlrp3 -/- HOMA-IR Insulin (Day 26) tolerance test (6 weeks) WT Nlrp3-/- Note: BGE-102 was dosed PO QD; semaglutide was dosed S

  72. Slide 72: GA: BGE-102 analog prevented lipofuscin accumulation

    P3 LR N OPHTHALMOLOGY GA: In a natural AMD preclinical model, oral delivery of a BGE-102 analog prevented age-related lipofuscin accumulation, a key disease feature Natural AMD model BAL-1901 prevented lipofuscin accumulation Lipofuscin punctae accumulate with age in outbred (HET3) mice with 3 mo of

  73. Slide 73: Planned BGE-102 Phase 1b/2a POC in DME

    P3 LR N OPHTHALMOLOGY Planned BGE-102 Phase 1b/2a POC in DME: goal is to demonstrate PD in the eye Anti-VEGF + oral placebo N=30 Primary endpoint ● % change in intraocular IL-6 DME R Anti-VEGF + BGE-102 N=30 Exploratory ● Additional intraocular biomarkers ● Plasma biomarkers Sham + BGE-102 N=30 ● BC

  74. Slide 74: Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in DME & GA

    Targeting the NLRP3 inflammasome in DME & GA Brian Hafler, MD, PhD Associate Professor Ophthalmology & Visual Science, Yale School of Medicine

  75. Slide 75: NLRP3 inflammasome plays a key role in DME & dry AMD / GA

    The NLRP3 inflammasome plays a key role in DME & dry AMD / GA Diabetic macular edema

  76. Slide 76: NLRP3 inflammasome plays a key role in DME & dry AMD / GA

    The NLRP3 inflammasome plays a key role in DME & dry AMD / GA Diabetic macular edema Geographic atrophy

  77. Slide 77: Real-world DME remains burdensome despite anti-VEGF therapy

    Real-world DME remains burdensome despite anti-VEGF therapy Why oral therapy matters Median of 9 intravitreal injections An effective oral adjunct or alternative could in year 1 across treatment arms reduce procedure burden and expand options for incompletely controlled patients. Treatment intensity

  78. Slide 78: Human aqueous humor data support inflammation-rich DME

    Human aqueous humor data support inflammation-rich DME Key findings ● Diabetic macular edema 124-patient aqueous humor study eyes showed higher IL-1β, IL-6, IL-8, MCP-1, Scientific implication IL-10, and VEGF than diabetic eyes without macular edema. An upstream inflammasome-directed ● These markers

  79. Slide 79: Ph2 results for VEGF + IL-6 inhibition in DME

    Ph2 results for VEGF + IL-6 inhibition support role of inflammation in DME N=124 Participants with ≥ 15 letter gain Sources: Roche ASOPRS / AAO 2025 Virtual IR Event; ARVO 2026 44.7% ranibizumab + vamikibart vs. 28.6% ranibizumab

  80. Slide 80: Exploratory clinical data support inflammasome as target in DME

    Exploratory clinical data support the inflammasome as a target in DME +9.8 letters -1.8 letters lamivudine at week 4 placebo at week 4 Interpretation These data support the relevance of inflammasome modulation in diabetic macular edema

  81. Slide 81: BGE-102 is positioned upstream of inflammatory drivers in DME

    BGE-102 is positioned upstream of inflammatory drivers in DME BGE-102 Mechanism ● Oral inhibitor of the NLRP3 inflammasome ● Intended to reduce inflammatory cytokines and vascular leakage ● Could complement anti-VEGF or potentially serve as an alternative in selected patients ● Oral dosing is the ke

  82. Slide 82: IL-1β drives retinal VEGF in vivo

    IL-1β, a downstream effector of the NLRP3 inflammasome, drives retinal VEGF in vivo Mechanistic implication If upstream NLRP3 inhibition reduces IL-1β signaling, it may also reduce VEGFA-linked vascular leakage.

  83. Slide 83: Drusen are inflammatory drivers of the NLRP3 inflammasome in AMD

    Drusen are inflammatory drivers of the NLRP3 inflammasome in AMD Drusen from donor AMD eyes activate the NLRP3 inflammasome. Doyle, S., Campbell, M., Ozaki, E. et al. Nat Med 18, 791–798 (2012). Hafler BP. Retina. 37(3):417, 2017 Dhodapkar RM, Martell D, Hafler BP. Glial-mediated neuroinflammatory m

  84. Slide 84: NLRP3 knockout rescues RPE degeneration in mouse model of GA

    NLRP3 knockout rescues RPE degeneration in mouse model of GA Wild-Type mice Nlrp3 knockout mice Subretinal injection Subretinal Control Control amyloid β injection amyloid β Healthy 100 % 0% 100 % 100 % RPE Narendran, S., Pereira, F., Yerramothu, P. et al. Nucleoside reverse transcriptase inhibitors

  85. Slide 85: Inflammasome inhibition in humans: early signals in GA

    Inflammasome inhibition in humans: promising early signals of potential efficacy in GA Phase 1 clinical trial suggests potential for Decreased incidence of AMD observed with fluoxetine, a weak NLRP3 inhibitor in a retrospective analysis inflammasome inhibitor intravitreal implant K8 53% reduction in

  86. Slide 86: DME & GA treatment landscape

    DME & GA David Boyer, MD treatment landscape Senior Partner Retina-Vitreous Associates Medical Group

  87. Slide 87: Diabetic macular edema (DME)

    Diabetic macular edema (DME)

  88. Slide 88: DME is the leading cause of vision loss in working aged adults

    DME is the leading cause of vision loss working aged adults Normal Vision Vision with DME ~27M ~25% of all diabetes patients develop DME within 10 patients years of diagnosis globally 60 years average age of diagnosis Elevated HbA1c is the largest risk factor for DME Systemic disease, progression re

  89. Slide 89: DME progresses due to hyperglycemia-driven vascular fluid leakage

    DME progresses due to hyperglycemia-driven vascular fluid leakage in the macula, directly causing central vision loss Chronic hyperglycemia Persistent fluid damages Fluid accumulates in causes breakdown of photoreceptor layer (EZ) the macula, visible on OCT the blood-retinal barrier Leads to central

  90. Slide 90: ~45% of diagnosed patients are treated with anti-VEGFs

    ~45% of diagnosed patients are treated with anti-VEGFs; ~55% are observed and not actively treated Diagnosed DME patients ~55% ~45% Observed Treated ● Patients with no to mild VA impairment, but ● Anti-VEGFs are generally initiated once progressive structural damage on OCT scan disease becomes cente

  91. Slide 91: Compliance is a key challenge

    Compliance is a key challenge … Number of anti-VEGF injections received Injections are invasive Real-world (IRIS) vs aflibercept 2 mg q8W label and inconvenient; in the real world, they are not administered as frequently as they should be Aflibercept Q8W per label Real-world Number of eyes DME 124,6

  92. Slide 92: 50-70% lower VA gains in the real world vs. trials

    … that has led to 50-70% lower VA gains in the real world vs. in trials Real world Clinical trials Sources: Ciulla 2020, Wells 2015, Boyer 2015, Korobelnik 2014 92

  93. Slide 93: ~50% of patients have persistent fluid on anti-VEGF therapy

    Even with strong compliance, ~50% of patients have persistent fluid on anti-VEGF therapy % of eyes with persistent DME* *Note: Persistent DME was defined as central subfield thickness ≥ 250 µm Source: Bressler 2018 93

  94. Slide 94: An effective oral therapy could benefit more patients

    An effective oral therapy could benefit not only patients currently treated with anti-VEGFs but could allow for treatment of earlier-stage disease not currently treated Disease progression Sums to 100% of diagnosed DME patients Observed Treated ~15% ~40% ~25% ~20% No VA Mild VA Inadequately Well con

  95. Slide 95: Geographic atrophy (GA)

    Geographic atrophy (GA)

  96. Slide 96: Geographic atrophy is a leading cause of blindness in the elderly

    Geographic atrophy is a leading cause of blindness in the elderly, characterized by irreversible central vision loss GA vision loss progression >8M Most severe form of AMD (~20% of all cases) At risk Early patients Est. 18M patients by 2040: rapidly growing globally Age 75: median age of onset Chara

  97. Slide 97: GA is characterized by continuous neurodegenerative decline

    GA is characterized by continuous neurodegenerative decline Expansion of atrophic RPE cell death leads to Drusen build up & initial RPE lesions photoreceptor degeneration dysfunction Lesions signal established GA Photoreceptors convert light and lead to VA loss when they into vision signals cover th

  98. Slide 98: Effects of GA on quality of life can be devastating

    The effects of GA on quality of life can be devastating, making it difficult or impossible for independent living Source: Bakri 2024,: Global Geographic Atrophy Insights Survey (N=203) 98

  99. Slide 99: Approved complement inhibitors reduce lesion growth by 15-20%

    Approved complement inhibitors have been shown to reduce lesion growth by 15-20%, no vision preservation shown to date Lesion growth Syfovre OAKS/DERBY Pooled Analysis- Showed declines in VA similar to sham but significant lesion growth rate reduction Visual acuity Source: Khanani 2023 99

  100. Slide 100: Complement inhibitors prescribed in ~10% of patients

    Complement inhibitors are currently prescribed in ~10% of patients Lesion growth in GA Efficacy Treatment Burden Modest slowing of lesion growth Intravitreal RoA Office visits & caregiver burden Injection site complications An effective oral therapy could rebalance efficacy and treatment burden Sour

  101. Slide 101: An oral therapy could be used in earlier stages of dry AMD

    An oral therapy could be used in earlier stages of dry AMD patients to slow GA progression GA Intravitreal injections only ~1M Complement inhibitors (~10% penetration) waterline Dry AMD ~10M Already taking oral AREDS supplements, a prophylactic treatment recommended by all ophthalmologists 101

  102. Slide 102: Emerging approvable endpoint: the ellipsoid zone (EZ)

    Emerging approvable endpoint: the ellipsoid zone (EZ) ● Definition: The EZ is a hyperreflective, photoreceptor rich band observed on OCT, serving as a crucial biomarker for assessing retinal health and vision loss ● Clinical relevance: EZ attenuation (loss) precedes GA formation and is the strongest

  103. Slide 103: Summary & Q&A

    Summary & Q&A Kristen Fortney, PhD Co-Founder & CEO

  104. Slide 104: Pipeline overview

    Pipeline overview Leveraging the BioAge platform to address key unmet needs in metabolic aging Mechanism Target IND- Program of action dosing Indication Discovery Lead op enabling Phase 1 Phase 2 Anticipated milestones CV risk CV risk Phase 2 results H2:2026 NLRP3 inhibitor BGE-102 (CNS penetrant) O

  105. Slide 105: Q&A

    BIOAGE Q&A

  106. Slide 106: BIOAGE

    BIOAGE

BioAge Labs — Investor Day (May 2026) on 6ix