Matador Resources Company · NYSE:MTDR

Matador Resources — Investor Presentation (August 2015)

69 slides from Matador Resources's investor presentation, Aug 12, 2015

  1. Slide 1: August 2015 Investor Presentation

    August 2015 Investor Presentation NYSE: MTDR Exhibit 99.1

  2. Slide 2: Disclosure Statements

    2 Disclosure Statements Safe Harbor Statement – This presentation and statements made by representatives of Matador Resources Company (“Matador” or the “Company”) during the course of this presentation include “forward-looking statements” within the meaning of Section 27A of the Securities Act of 19

  3. Slide 3: Company Summary

    merry aie 4 Matador J 4 cm dy A RESOURCES COMPANY a : ; Company Summary

  4. Slide 4: Company history and capital raising milestones

    2012, 2013 and 2014 capital spending focused primarily on developing Eagle Ford and transitioning to oil February 2012 IPO at $12.00; net cash proceeds of ~$136 million May 2014 Follow-on Offering at $25.00; net cash proceeds of ~$181 million September 2013 Follow-on Offering at $15.25; net cash pro

  5. Slide 5: Company Overview

    5 Company Overview Exchange: Ticker NYSE: MTDR Shares Outstanding(1) 85.4 million common shares Share Price(1) $22.40/share Market Capitalization(1) $1.9 billion (1) Shares outstanding as reported in the Form 10-Q for the quarter ended June 30, 2015 and share price as of August 10, 2015. (2) The Com

  6. Slide 6: Matador Resources Company – Operations Overview

    Matador Resources Company – Operations Overview Market Capitalization(1) $1.9 billion Avg. Daily Production – Q2 2015(2) 26,601 BOE/d Oil (% total) 13,847 Bbl/d (52%) Natural Gas (% total) 76.5 MMcf/d (48%) Proved Reserves @ 6/30/2015 87.0 million BOE % Proved Developed 39% % Oil 47% 2015E CapEx(3)

  7. Slide 7: Matador's Execution History – Doing What We Say

    Matador’s Execution History – “Doing What We Say” Oil Production  414 Bbl/d of oil  6% oil  4,916 Bbl/d of oil  46% oil  13,847 Bbl/d of oil  52% oil Proved Reserves  27 MMBOE  1.1 MMBbl of oil  4% oil  39 MMBOE  12.1 MMBbl of oil  31% oil  87 MMBOE  40.6 MMBbl of oil  47% oil PV-10(2

  8. Slide 8: Oil and Natural Gas Proved Reserves and PV-10 Growth By Area

    8 Eagle Ford $603.8 million, 58% Eagle Ford $540.4 million, 82% Haynesville/CV $193.4 million, 18% Permian $246.2 million, 24% Haynesville/CV $82.9 million, 13% Permian $31.9 million, 5% Eagle Ford $424.6 million, 45% Haynesville/CV $93.3 million, 10% Permian $424.8 million, 45% December 31, 2013 To

  9. Slide 9: Net Debt / LTM EBITDA and financial discipline

    0.0x 0.0x 0.1x 1.5x 0.2x 0.7x 1.1x 1.3x 1.5x 1.6x 0.8x 1.0x 1.2x 0.6x 1.0x 1.3x 1.6x 1.4x 2008 2009 2010 2011 1Q12 2Q12 3Q12 4Q12 1Q13 2Q13 3Q13 4Q13 1Q14 2Q14 3Q14 4Q14 1Q15 2Q15 Net Debt / LTM EBITDA $76 $240 $256 $416  Be prudent with our investors’ capital  Reduced drilling program from 5 rigs

  10. Slide 10: Matador's Continued Production Growth Through June 30, 2015

    Matador’s Continued Production Growth Through June 30, 2015 Average Daily Oil Production (Bbl/d) Average Daily Natural Gas Production (MMcf/d) Average Daily Total Production (MBOE/d) Oil Production Mix (% of Average Daily Production) 10 Growth since IPO Growth since IPO Growth since IPO Growth since

  11. Slide 11: Peer comparison and growth in PV-10 and Adjusted EBITDA

    1.1x 1.2x 1.3x 1.5x 1.8x 1.9x 2.0x 2.0x 2.0x 2.7x 3.3x 3.5x 3.9x 4.3x 4.3x Peer B Peer A Peer C Peer D Peer J Peer I Peer G Peer H Peer E Peer F Peer L Peer N 0 Peer M Peer K $0.38 $0.58 $1.17 $2.15 $3.26 $3.74 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 $1.75 $2.92 $5.82 $7.84 $11.15 $14.86 2009 2010 2011 2012 2

  12. Slide 12: Previous Oil Price Declines Have Created Opportunities for Matador

    12 Previous Oil Price Declines Have Created Opportunities for Matador(1) Comparison of Major Oil Corrections and Major Matador Turning Points Since 1980 Date Event % Change in Oil Price Length of Oil Price Decline (in trading days) % Increase in Oil Price – 1-Year Post-Low 1986 Saudi Market Share Wa

  13. Slide 13: Keys to Matador's Success

    Keys to Matador’s Success Over Last 35 Years(1) 13  People  We have a strong, committed technical and financial team in place, and we continue to make additions and improvements to our staff, our capabilities and our processes  Board and Special Advisor additions have strengthened Board skills an

  14. Slide 14: Permian Basin

    Permian Basin Southeast New Mexico and West Texas

  15. Slide 15: Delaware Basin – A World Class Hydrocarbon System

    15 Delaware Basin – A “World Class” Hydrocarbon System DELAWARE BASIN CENTRAL BASIN PLATFORM MIDLAND BASIN Wolfcamp Simpson ~23,000’ Sediment Fill East West Source “Kitchens” Now Unconventional Resource Plays  70,000 square mile area  Up to 25,000 feet of multiple, stacked, petroleum systems  Ext

  16. Slide 16: Permian Basin Acreage Position and Recent Test Results

    Permian Basin Acreage Position and Recent Test Results Note: All acreage at August 4, 2015. Some tracts not shown on map. (1) As of August 4, 2015. (2) As of July 8, 2015. (3) As of April 28, 2015. (4) Formerly the Ranger 33 State Com #1H. (5) Formerly the Rustler Breaks 12-24-27 #1H. (6) Formerly t

  17. Slide 17: Stacked pay potential and type logs

     Determining “Good, Better, Best” important as potential exceeds inter-formational stacked pay  2015 program will expand on intra-formational stacked pay tests performed in each asset area 4,000 feet of Hydrocarbon Column Creates Opportunity Wolf Area Type Log – Wolfcamp X/Y X Test Y Test 80 acre

  18. Slide 18: Matador is a Significant Delaware Basin Player

    Matador is a Significant Delaware Basin Player MTDR MTDR MTDR MTDR  Matador’s 89,600 net acres place it among the largest operators in the Delaware Basin − Matador holds largest Delaware Basin acreage position among small and mid-cap publicly traded energy companies(1) − Matador is the second large

  19. Slide 19: Matador's Acreage Among Other Significant Delaware Basin Activity

    19 Matador’s Acreage Among Other Significant Delaware Basin Activity Matador Acreage Note: Horizontal wells shown based upon publicly available data as of March 31, 2015. All Matador acreage at August 4, 2015. Other Operators Wolf Prospect Area – Loving County, TX L o v in g W in k le r Ward Cimarex

  20. Slide 20: Wolf Inventory – Multi-Pay Development Potential

    Wolf Inventory – Multi-Pay Development Potential ~660’ Brushy Canyon Avalon 1st Bone Spring 2nd Bone Spring 3rd Bone Spring Wolfcamp X/Y Wolfcamp A 4 66 Eval. Ongoing 34 66 66 66 302 Full Development Location Gross Wells Development Well D&C(1) CapEx EUR(2) (MBOE) Bone Spring $6 – $7 million 450 – 6

  21. Slide 21: Wolf Area Wolfcamp A/X Wells Performing Above Expectations

    10 100 1000 10000 0 50 100 150 200 250 300 350 400 450 500 Production R ate, BO E/d ay Time, Days Dorothy White #1H Norton Schaub #1H Johnson 44 #204H 500 MBOE Type Curve 700 MBOE Type Curve 1,000 MBOE Type Curve Dorothy White #1H has produced 358,000 BOE (67% oil) in 15.5 months - "X" Norton Schaub

  22. Slide 22: Rustler Breaks Inventory – Multi-Pay Development Inventory

    Rustler Breaks Inventory – Multi-Pay Development Inventory Brushy Canyon Avalon 1st Bone Spring 2nd Bone Spring 3rd Bone Spring X/Y Wolfcamp B ~8 0 0 ’ 65 73 73 77 69 77 65 499 Full Development Location Gross Wells Development Well D&C(1) CapEx EUR(2) (MBOE) Bone Spring $5.25 – $6.25 million 350 – 6

  23. Slide 23: Matador's First Three-Zone Stacked Lateral Test at Rustler Breaks

    Historically oil productive interval. Matador’s First Three-Zone Stacked Lateral Test at Rustler Breaks Bone Spring Lime Upper Avalon Shale Lower Avalon Shale First Bone Spring Sand Second Bone Spring Carbonate Third Bone Spring Carbonate Wolfcamp / Pennsylvanian Strawn Wolfcamp “C” Third Bone Sprin

  24. Slide 24: Rustler Breaks Wolfcamp B Wells Performing Above Expectations

    10 100 1000 10000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 Production R ate, BO E/d ay Time, Days Rustler Breaks #224H Tiger #224H 500 MBOE Type Curve 600 MBOE Type Curve 700 MBOE Type Curve 1000 MBOE Type Curve Rustler Breaks 12-24S-27E RB #224H(1) has produced 170,000

  25. Slide 25: Rustler Breaks Wolfcamp A Well Off to Strong Start

    10 100 1000 10000 0 20 40 60 80 100 120 140 160 180 200 220 240 260 280 300 320 340 360 Production R ate, BO E/d ay Time, Days Guitar #202H 500 MBOE Type Curve 700 MBOE Type Curve Guitar 10-24S-28E RB #202H has produced 38,300 BOE (78% oil) in 1.5 months Wolfcamp "A"/"X-Y" horizontal in Rustler Brea

  26. Slide 26: Ranger Inventory – Multi-Well Development Potential

    Ranger Inventory – Multi-Well Development Potential ~1,320’ 1st Bone Spring 2nd Bone Spring 3rd Bone Spring X/Y Wolfcamp A-D ~7 5 0 ’ 43 55 30 70 6 204 1 mile MRC Horizontal Drilled Full Development Location Full Development Spacing Pattern (Cross-Section View) Gross Wells Development Well D&C(1) Ca

  27. Slide 27: Ranger Area Second Bone Spring Wells Performing Above Expectations

    27 Ranger Area Second Bone Spring Wells Performing Above Expectations Note: Production as of May 17, 2015. (1) Formerly the Ranger 33 State Com #1H. (2) Formerly the Pickard State 20-18-34 #1H. 400 MBOE Type Curve 600 MBOE Type Curve 10 100 1,000 10,000 0 100 200 300 400 500 Production R ate, BO E/

  28. Slide 28: New Rig Improvements

    New Rig Improvements  7,500 psi Pressure Rating  Estimated reduction in drilling time of 15 to 20% in the lateral on Wolfcamp wells  Telescoping Flex-joint  Estimated reduction in drilling time of 12 to 18 hours per well  Integrated Mud-Gas Separator  Estimated savings of 50% compared to renta

  29. Slide 29: Latest Technology: Simultaneous Operations (Sim-Ops) Capable Rigs

    Latest Technology: Simultaneous Operations (Sim-Ops) Capable Rigs 29 Conventional Drilling Configuration Sim-Ops Capable with V-door turned 90° Space available for frac operations while simultaneously drilling on the same pad Drilling rig must leave location prior to frac operations

  30. Slide 30: Improving Wolfcamp Drilling Times

    43 32 35 26 23 15 0 5 10 15 20 25 30 35 40 45 50 Loving County Wolfcamp Eddy County Wolfcamp Dril ling Da y s Historical Well 2015 Planned Well Recent Well Improving Wolfcamp Drilling Times 30 *Historical days averaged from 2014 wells *Recent days from Johnson #207H & Tiger #204H

  31. Slide 31: Total Prospective Equivalent Oil Price Uplifts

    $50.00 $7.50 $5.10 $4.50 $3.00 $3.00 $0.90 $74.00 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 Total Prospective Equivalent Oil Price Uplifts 31 $50.00 $7.50 $6.00 $4.50 $3.00 $3.00 $74.00 $0.00 $10.00 $20.00 $30.00 $40.00 $50.00 $60.00 $70.00 $80.00 Current Oil Price Frac Savings M

  32. Slide 32: Artificial Lift Reducing Natural Production Declines

    32 Flowing Rod Pumping Gas Lifting 300 Bbl/d 100 Bbl/d Accelerated Production Benefits of Gas Lift • Accelerates production • Reduces LOE • Lower maintenance • Helps wells recover faster from offset fracs Artificial Lift Reducing Natural Production Declines Time Note: Graph and data is for illustrat

  33. Slide 33: Evolution of Permian Basin Frac Design

    33 7,500 Bbl 9,000 Bbl 8,400 Bbl 600 Mlbs 420 Mlbs 500 Mlbs Evolution of Permian Basin Frac Design – Reservoir Specific 375 ft. 300 ft. 50 ft. 75 ft. 210 ft. 35 ft. Gen 1 Gen 2 2,000 lbs/ft 1,333 lbs/ft 40 Bbl/ft 20 Bbl/ft 50’ cluster spacing 75’ cluster spacing Gen 1 Gen 2 2,000 lbs/ft 2,000 lbs/ft

  34. Slide 34: Permian Basin Economics – Oil Price Sensitivities

    34 Permian Basin Economics – Oil Price Sensitivities /Bbl /Bbl 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 90 100 110 120 40 45 50 55 60 65 70 75 80 ROR , % Realized Oil Price, $ /Bbl Dorothy White 700 - 1,000 MBOE ROR vs Oil Price 1,000 MBOE, $9.6 MM D&C 1,000 MBOE, $8 MM D&C 700 MBOE, $9.6 MM D&C 700 MBOE, $8 MM D&

  35. Slide 35: Significant Delaware Basin Inventory

    Significant Delaware Basin Inventory  Matador has identified 1,445 gross (960 net) locations(1)  This inventory does not yet include the HEYCO properties or Twin Lakes locations Formation Gross Locations Net Locations Delaware Group 109 67 Avalon 160 112 1st Bone Spring 146 96 2nd Bone Spring 210

  36. Slide 36: Midstream

    a‘, . 4 Matador ae cm Wore = Midstream

  37. Slide 37: Longwood Gathering and Disposal Systems in Delaware Basin

    37 Longwood Gathering and Disposal Systems(1) in Delaware Basin  Loving County, Texas  Natural gas gathering and compression  Water gathering  Salt water disposal  Oil gathering  Cryogenic natural gas processing plant  Eddy County, New Mexico  Natural gas gathering and compression  Water ga

  38. Slide 38: Midstream Initiatives Growing into Respectable Stand-Alone Business

    Midstream Initiatives Growing into Respectable Stand-Alone Business 38  Expect to spend ~$48 million on midstream initiatives in the Permian Basin in 2015  Matador expects Longwood to be able to support its own sources of financing  Additional third-party volumes and a contemplated natural gas pr

  39. Slide 39: Loving County, Texas – Biggest Midstream Project to Date

    39 Loving County, Texas – Biggest Midstream Project to Date  Natural gas gathering and compression  Cryogenic natural gas processing plant  Water gathering  Salt water disposal  Oil gathering SWD = Salt Water Disposal

  40. Slide 40: Eagle Ford "Oil Bank"

    Citar a Wor nesounces dor Eagle Ford “Oil Bank”

  41. Slide 41: Eagle Ford Overview

    41 Eagle Ford Overview Note: All acreage at August 4, 2015. Some tracts not shown on map. (1) At December 31, 2014. Karnes Uvalde Medina Zavala Frio Dimmit La Salle Webb Atascosa McMullen Live Oak Bee Goliad Dewitt Gonzales Wilson San Antonio Glasscock Ranch Martin Ranch Northcut Affleck Troutt Sutt

  42. Slide 42: Eagle Ford – 2014 Accomplishments

    Eagle Ford – 2014 Accomplishments 42  Increased net oil production rate by 44% from ~6,400 Bbl/d in Q4 2013 to ~9,100 Bbl/d in Q4 2014  Added 2,900 net acres, more than replacing 2014 Eagle Ford drilled inventory of ~36 net wells (See chart to the right)  Evolved from Generation 5 to 7 frac desig

  43. Slide 43: Evolution of Matador Eagle Ford Frac Design

    Gen 2 Gen 3 Gen 4 Gen 5 5,770 Bbl 7,825 Bbl 9,550 Bbl 11,750 Bbl 375 Mlbs 500 Mlbs 405 Mlbs 515 Mlbs 11,750 Bbl 650 Mlbs Gen 6 43 Note: Figure depicts proppant and fluid volume pumped per 300 ft. of horizontal wellbore. (1) Mlbs = thousands of pounds of proppant pumped. Fluid Volume Pumped Proppant

  44. Slide 44: Haynesville Shale "Gas Bank"

    Haynesville Shale “Gas Bank”

  45. Slide 45: Haynesville – Chesapeake Elm Grove Operations

    Haynesville – Chesapeake Elm Grove Operations 45  Estimated capital expenditures of ~$25 million for non-operated well participation interests ˗ Only ~6% of 2015 estimated capital expenditures ˗ Originally budgeted ~$15 million for 2015  31 gross (3.8 net) wells turned to sales throughout Tier 1 H

  46. Slide 46: Economics of Tier 1 Haynesville Wells at Elm Grove

    Economics of Tier 1 Wells (10 Bcf) Haynesville at Elm Grove 46 Note: Individual well economics only. Excludes costs prior to drilling (i.e. acquisition or acreage costs). Economics use a NRI / WI of 85% but actual interests vary. Natural gas price differential = ($0.55)/Mcf. D&C cost = drilling and

  47. Slide 47: 2015 Capital Investment Plan

    2015 Capital Investment Plan

  48. Slide 48: Update 2015 Capital Investment Plan

    48 Update 2015 Capital Investment Plan  At the beginning of 2015, reduced drilling program from 5 rigs to 2 rigs due to lower commodity prices, with primary focus on Permian (Delaware) Basin  In late July 2015, took delivery of a third rig with primary focus on Permian (Delaware) Basin  Currently

  49. Slide 49: 2015E CapEx

     2015E CapEx of ~$425 million − Revised from $350 million on August 4, 2015 − Excluding CapEx associated with HEYCO merger or associated JVs  2015E CapEx highest in Q1 2015 – falls quickly thereafter − Q1 at $159 million (37%); Q2 at $107 million (25%); Q3 and Q4 at $159 million total (remaining 3

  50. Slide 50: 2015E Oil and Natural Gas Production

    0 2,000 4,000 6,000 8,000 10,000 12,000 14,000 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E Eagle Ford Permian 422 3,318 5,843 9,095 12,192 (1)(2) 0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70 80 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E Haynesville/CV Eagle Ford Permian 39.8 34.1 35.4 41.9 72.6 (1)(3) 2015E Oil Production  Estimated oil production of 4.4

  51. Slide 51: 2015E Revenues and Adjusted EBITDA

    $23.6 $49.9 $115.9 $191.8 $262.9 $225.0 $0.0 $100.0 $200.0 $300.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E $34.0 $67.0 $156.0 $269.0 $367.7 $295.0 $0.0 $100.0 2 . $300.0 $400.0 2010 2011 2012 2013 2014 2015E $76.39 $93.80 $101.86 $99.79 $87.37 $49.73 $3.75 $3.62 $2.59 $4.35 $5.08 $2.92 Realized Oil and Natura

  52. Slide 52: Summary and 2015 Guidance

    52 Summary and 2015 Guidance  Moved from 5 rigs to 2 rigs in early 2015; currently operating 3 rigs in Delaware Basin − Added third drilling rig in the Delaware Basin in late July 2015  Delaware drilling focused on Wolf development and further delineation of Ranger and Rustler Breaks prospect area

  53. Slide 53: Appendix

    Fan . ) (Matador Pm cm ween el’ = Appendix

  54. Slide 54: Board of Directors – Expertise and Stewardship

    Board of Directors – Expertise and Stewardship Board Members Professional Experience Business Expertise David M. Laney Lead Director - Past Chairman, Amtrak Board of Directors - Former Partner, Jackson Walker LLP Law and Investments Reynald A. Baribault Director - Vice President / Engineering and Co

  55. Slide 55: Special Board Advisors

    Special Board Advisors Professional Experience Business Expertise Ronney F. Coleman - Retired President – North America, Archer - Former Vice President North America Pumping, BJ Services Co. Oilfield Services Marlan W. Downey - Retired President, ARCO International - Former President, Shell Pecten I

  56. Slide 56: Proven Management Team – Experienced Leadership

    Proven Management Team – Experienced Leadership Management Team Background and Prior Affiliations Industry Experience Matador Experience Joseph Wm. Foran Founder, Chairman and CEO - Matador Petroleum Corporation, Foran Oil Company, James Cleo Thompson Jr. 34 years Since Inception Matthew V. Hairford

  57. Slide 57: Hedging Profile

    420,000 680,000 810,000 810,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 390,000 $99.75 $87.72 $84.60 $84.60 $74.64 $74.64 $74.64 $74.64 $83.00 $70.38 $67.11 $67.11 $47.46 $47.46 $47.46 $47.46 $0 $50 $100 $150 $200 $250 $300 0 100,000 200,000 300,000 400,000 500,000 600,000 700,000 800,000 900,000 Q1 2015 Q2 2015 Q3

  58. Slide 58: Credit Agreement Status

     Strong, supportive bank group led by Royal Bank of Canada  Borrowing base at $375 million based on December 31, 2014 reserves  Bank group affirmed $375 million conforming borrowing base in April 2015  Retained full $375 million conforming borrowing base upon closing of Senior Notes offering  N

  59. Slide 59: Wolf-Bone Geological Setting

    59 “Wolf-Bone” Geological Setting, Predicting Where the Better Rocks Are 265 mya End of Bone Springs – Warmer! Delaware Basin San Andres Yeso Abo Delaware Mountain Group 1st, 2nd, 3rd Bone Spring Sands Sands confined to channels and distributary systems 1st, 2nd, 3rd Bone Spring Carbonates Wolfcamp

  60. Slide 60: North Ranger-Twin Lakes Area Pennsylvanian/Wolfcamp Production Distribution

    North Ranger-Twin Lakes Area Pennsylvanian/Wolfcamp Production Distribution 60 A A’ MATADOR RESOURCES COMPANY PICKARD STATE 20-18-34 #2H Northern Delaware Horizontal Pennsylvanian/Wolfcamp Shale Test Vacuum Field Townsend Field 166 wells 25 million Bbl, 49 Bcf Sanmal & Leamex Fields Corbin Field Kem

  61. Slide 61: Pennsylvanian/Wolfcamp Hybrid Production Target Interval

    0 1 5 0 G R (C TR ) 2 2 0 0 0 0 L L D 0 .3 0 D P H I 0 .3 0 N P H I 0 1 5 0 GR (C TR ) 0 .3 0 D P H I 0 .3 0 N P H I 0 1 5 0 G R (C TR ) 2 2 0 0 0 0 ILM 2 2 0 0 0 0 L L D 0 .3 0 D P H I 0 .3 0 N P H I 0 1 5 0 GR (C TR ) 2 2 0 0 0 0 ILM 2 2 0 0 0 0 L L D 0 .3 0 D P H I 0 .3 0 N P H I 0 1 5 0 G R (C T

  62. Slide 62: Understanding the Petroleum Systems for Maximum Oil Recovery

    Understanding the Petroleum Systems for Maximum Oil Recovery Note: Diagram Modified from Bishop (2014). Eagle Ford & Haynesville Wolfcamp Bone Spring Conventional Unconventional Shelf Organic-Rich Basin Decoupled Coupled Micro-Coupled In-Situ Bone Spring Source Rock and Reservoir ReservoirRock Sourc

  63. Slide 63: WTI Oil Price and Service Prices

    $60,000 $80,000 $100,000 $120,000 $140,000 $160,000 $180,000 $200,000 7/5/2014 8/24/2014 10/13/2014 12/2/2014 1/21/2015 $0 $20 $40 $60 $80 $100 $120 $140 Fr ac In de x Pric e & Drilli ng Sp rea d Ra te W TI Oi l Pri ce WTI Oil Price Frac Index Price Drilling Spread Rate WTI Oil Price and Service Pri

  64. Slide 64: Infrastructure Development savings

    Saltwater disposal savings $1.30/Bbl of produced water Infrastructure Development ...equivalent to a $5.10/Bbl uplift in oil prices Oil pipeline fee reduction ...an uplift of $0.90/Bbl in oil prices 64

  65. Slide 65: Potential Water Recycling Savings for Loving County

    Potential Water Recycling Savings for Loving County Saltwater Disposal Produced Water Purchase Frac Water Frac Additives Fracturing Well (~200,000 Bbl) Recycling Potential savings of up to $600,000 per well ...equivalent to a $3.00/Bbl uplift in oil prices 65

  66. Slide 66: Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation

    66 Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation This investor presentation includes the non-GAAP financial measure of Adjusted EBITDA. Adjusted EBITDA is a supplemental non-GAAP financial measure that is used by management and external users of consolidated financial statements, such as industry analysts, investo

  67. Slide 67: Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation

    Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation The following table presents our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP financial measures of net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities, respectively. 67 (In thousands) 1Q 2012 2Q 2012 3Q 2012 4Q 2012 1Q 2

  68. Slide 68: Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation

    Adjusted EBITDA Reconciliation The following table presents our calculation of Adjusted EBITDA and reconciliation of Adjusted EBITDA to the GAAP financial measures of net income (loss) and net cash provided by operating activities, respectively. 68 Note: LTM is last 12 months. LTM at LTM at LTM at (

  69. Slide 69: PV-10 Reconciliation

    69 PV-10 Reconciliation PV-10 is a non-GAAP financial measure and generally differs from Standardized Measure, the most directly comparable GAAP financial measure, because it does not include the effects of income taxes on future net revenues. PV-10 is not an estimate of the fair market value of the

Matador Resources — Investor Presentation (August 2015) on 6ix