Fennec Pharmaceuticals Inc. · NASDAQ:FENC

Fennec Pharmaceuticals — Investor Presentation (June 2015)

28 slides from Fennec Pharmaceuticals's investor presentation, June 2015

  1. Slide 1: Corporate Presentation

    Corporate Presentation June 2015

  2. Slide 2: Safe Harbor Statement

    Safe Harbor Statement During the course of this presentation we will make statements that constitute forward-looking statements. These statements may include operating expense projections, the initiation, timing and results of pending or future clinical trials, the actions or potential action of the

  3. Slide 3: Company Overview

    Company Overview • US based biopharmaceutical company focused on the development of Sodium Thiosulfate (STS) for the prevention of platinum-induced ototoxicity in pediatric patients – Granted FDA Orphan Drug Designation – 7.5 years market exclusivity – Potential for European Market Exclusivity for P

  4. Slide 4: Capital Structure and Share Information

    Capital Structure and Share Information Stock Listings FRX – TSX, Canada FENCF – OTCQB, USA Current Share Price USD$2.30 Shares Outstanding (millions) 10.9 Market Cap. (millions) USD$25.3 Warrants (millions) 1.3 with USD $1.50 exercise price (Nov. 22, 2018) 0.1 with USD $1.50 exercise price (Mar. 29

  5. Slide 5: Board of Directors and Management

    Board of Directors and Management Adrian Haigh – Director Rosty Raykov – Chairman and CEO – Currently SVP and General Manager Robert Andrade – Corp. Development PTC Therapeutics. Previously COO at Gentium S.p.A. - sold to Jazz Pharma for $1 billion. Anne McKay – Regulatory Affairs Dr. Khalid Islam –

  6. Slide 6: Platinum Hearing Loss is Frequent, Severe and Irreversible

    Platinum Hearing Loss is Frequent, Severe and Irreversible Globally, >7,000 children receive platinum based chemotherapy for localized cancers • USA: 2,000 EU: 3,000 RoW: 2,000 At least 60% develop profound irreversible ototoxicity* • Ototoxicity is a dose-limiting side effect • Effect can be seen a

  7. Slide 7: Devastating Impact on Quality of Life

    Devastating Impact on Quality of Life Even minimal hearing loss (MSHL) is damaging • High risk for being held back a grade (37% versus 3%) Neuroblastoma survivors with hearing loss • Twice the rate of parent reported problems with reading, math, attention and need for special education • Poorer chil

  8. Slide 8: COG ACCL0431: Randomized Phase 3 Study of STS for Prevention of Cisplatin-induced Hearing Loss

    COG ACCL0431: Randomized Phase 3 Study of STS for Prevention of Cisplatin-induced Hearing Loss • Newly diagnosed children with hepatoblastoma, germ cell tumor, osteosarcoma, neuroblastoma, medulloblastoma, and others • Local and metastatic disease • Study Chair: David Freyer, DO, MS • 131 randomized

  9. Slide 9: COG ACCL0431: Specific Aims

    COG ACCL0431: Specific Aims Primary Endpoint • Evaluate efficacy of STS for prevention of hearing loss in children receiving cisplatin chemotherapy (hypothesis: 50% relative reduction in hearing loss). Measured by hearing status at 4 weeks post-therapy defined by American Speech-Language-Hearing Ass

  10. Slide 10: Patient Characteristics

    Patient Characteristics Characteristic Observation (%) STS (%) Eligible 64 62 Germ Cell Tumor 16 (25.0) 16 (25.8) Osteosarcoma 15 (23.4) 15 (24.2) Medulloblastoma 14 (21.9) 12 (19.4) Neuroblastoma 12 (18.8) 14 (22.6) Hepatoblastoma 5 (7.8) 2 (3.2) Other 2 (3.1) 3 (4.8) Extent of Disease Localized 38

  11. Slide 11: COG ACCL0431: Study Design

    COG ACCL0431: Study Design STS Arm STS 16 g/m2 IV Cisplatin per investigator over 15 min 6 hrs standard post each cisplatin dose Cisplatin- containing Randomize Standard audiometry at baseline and chemotherapy ~24 hrs before each cisplatin course Cisplatin per investigator standard OBS Arm Audiometr

  12. Slide 12: Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm

    Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm 1 Proportion with Hearing Loss 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 OBS STS 31/55 (56.4%) 14/49 (28.6%) n=104 evaluable patients / p = 0.004 11

  13. Slide 13: Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm and Age

    Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm and Age 1 Proportion with Hearing Loss 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Age <5 Age ≥5 OBS 11/15 (73.3%) 20/40 (50.0%) STS 31/55 (56.4%) 3/14 (21.4%) 14/49 11/35 (28.6%) (31.4%) p = 0.005 p = 0.103 12

  14. Slide 14: Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm and Disease

    Hearing Loss By Randomized Arm and Disease Proportion with Hearing Loss 1 0.8 0.6 0.4 0.2 0 Localized Disseminated OBS 17/33 (56.4%) 31/55 (51.5%) 14/22 14/49 (63.6%) (28.6%) STS 9/31 (29.0%) 5/18p =(27.8%) 0.067 p = 0.024 13

  15. Slide 15: Change in Mean Hearing Thresholds by Randomized Arm

    Change in Mean Hearing Thresholds by Randomized Arm1 * NORMAL * *p < 0.05 for post-treatment comparison between arms * 1In patients with evaluable pre-post frequency-specific audiometry, n=84-94 14

  16. Slide 16: EFS/OS by Randomization Arm

    EFS/OS by Randomization Arm All Patients, n=126 at median f/u of 2.9 yrs EFS by Randomization Arm OS by Randomization Arm 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 Estimated Proportion 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 Observation Observation STS 0.00 STS 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) Log Rank p = 0.31 Log Ran

  17. Slide 17: EFS/OS by Randomization Arm: Localized Disease Only

    EFS/OS by Randomization Arm Localized Disease Only, n=78 EFS by Randomization Arm (Localized Disease ) OS by Randomization Arm (Localized Disease) 1.00 1.00 0.75 Estimated Proportion 0.75 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 Observation Observation STS STS 0.00 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) Time (years)

  18. Slide 18: EFS/OS by Randomization Arm: Disseminated Disease Only

    EFS/OS by Randomization Arm Disseminated Disease Only, n=47 EFS by Randomization Arm (Metastatic Disease) OS by Randomization Arm (Metastatic Disease) 1.00 1.00 0.75 0.75 Estimated Proportion 0.50 0.50 0.25 0.25 Observation Observation STS STS 0.00 0.00 0 1 2 3 4 5 0 1 2 3 4 5 Time (years) Time (yea

  19. Slide 19: COG ACCL0431: Conclusions

    COG ACCL0431: Conclusions • STS protects against cisplatin-induced hearing loss in children • STS appears to be safe in patients with localized disease • Lower overall survival among children with disseminated cancer at onset of treatment, tumor protection or artifact?* * The protocol did not specif

  20. Slide 20: SIOPEL 6: Randomized Phase 3 Study of STS in Hepatoblastoma Patients

    SIOPEL 6: Rand. Phase 3 Study - Efficacy of STS in Reducing Ototoxicity in Hepatoblastoma Patients • Newly diagnosed children with standard risk hepatoblastoma • Single localized disease with very high historic survival rates • Cisplatin monotherapy treatment • Study Chair: Peppy Brock, MD, PhD, FRC

  21. Slide 21: SIOPEL 6: Objectives and Primary Endpoint

    SIOPEL 6: Objectives and Primary Endpoint Objectives: • To assess the efficacy of STS to reduce the hearing impairment caused by Cisplatin (CDDP) • To carefully monitor any potential impact of STS on response to CDDP and survival Primary endpoint: • Centrally reviewed absolute hearing threshold, at

  22. Slide 22: SIOPEL 6 – Study Design

    SIOPEL 6 – Study Design D E L AY E D R A N D O M I S A T I O N cDDP 80 mg/m 2 cDDP 4 Cycles 2 Cycles S U R G E R Y cDDP 80 mg/m 2 STS: 10-20 gm/m 2 cDDP + STS depending on age/weight 2 Cycles 4 Cycles 21

  23. Slide 23: SIOPEL 6: Early Efficacy and Tolerability Results

    SIOPEL 6: Early Efficacy and Tolerability Results ASCO 2015 Poster • Status at end of treatment (6 cycles) for 109 evaluable patients Cisplatin Cisplatin + STS Efficacy (n=52) (n=57) Complete response 44 (84.6%) 52 (91.2%) Stable disease 3 (5.8%) 4 (7.0%) Progressive disease 2 (3.9%) 0 Died (1) 1 (1

  24. Slide 24: SIOPEL 6: Early Efficacy and Tolerability Results

    SIOPEL 6: Early Efficacy and Tolerability Results ASCO 2015 Poster • Status at last follow up for 109 evaluable patients Cisplatin Cisplatin + STS Efficacy (n=52) (n=57) Complete Response 48 (92.3%) 52 (91.2%) Non CR 1 (1.9%) 3 (5.3%) Died 3 (5.8%) 1 (1.8%) Not available 0 1 (1.8%) 23

  25. Slide 25: SIOPEL 6: Early Efficacy and Tolerability Results

    SIOPEL 6: Early Efficacy and Tolerability Results ASCO 2015 Poster Grade 3 and 4 Acute Cisplatin Cisplatin + STS Toxicities (n=52) (n=57) Allergy 3 1 (1.9%) 0 Febrile neutropenia 3 4 (7.7%) 5 (8.8%) Infection 3 5 (9.6%) 6 (10.5%) Hypomagnesemia 3 1 (1.9%) 1 (1.8%) Hypermatremia 3 0 1 (1.8%) Vomiting

  26. Slide 26: SIOPEL 6: Conclusions

    SIOPEL 6: Conclusions ASCO 2015 Poster • This randomized phase III trial shows that it is safe to treat standard risk hepatoblastoma with six cycles of Cisplatin monotherapy with the addition of the chemoprotectant, Sodium Thiosulfate, provided that protocol instructions to add doxorubicin and stop

  27. Slide 27: STS: Development Strategy

    STS: Development Strategy EVENT TIMING FDA Type C Clinical Development Meeting  Mar 2011 Presented to Pediatric ODAC  ODAC recognized challenge of demonstrating STS does not reduce efficacy of Nov 2011 cisplatin and agreed adult study would not be appropriate COG ACCL0431 Phase 3 Clinical Data  J

  28. Slide 28: STS Investment Highlights

    STS Investment Highlights • US Orphan Drug Designation (7.5 years market exclusivity) • Potential for European Market Exclusivity for Pediatric Use (10 years) • Completed enrollment of two Phase 3 trials • COG Phase 3 trial achieved primary endpoint for hearing • SIOPEL 6 Phase 3 trial reported no a

Fennec Pharmaceuticals — Investor Presentation (June 2015) on 6ix