Axis NIFTY Bank ETF · NSE:BNKETFAXIS

Axis NIFTY Bank ETF — IEA Roundtable on Industrial Productivity and Competitiveness Impacts (January 2014)

11 slides from Axis NIFTY Bank ETF's conference presentation, Jan 27, 2014

  1. Slide 1: IEA Roundtable on Industrial Productivity and Competitiveness Impacts

    IEA Roundtable on Industrial Productivity and Competitiveness Impacts Paris, France January 27, 2014 Robert Bruce Lung – Industrial Energy Efficiency Advisor

  2. Slide 2: Song of the South quote

    “…Poppa got a job with the TVA, He bought a washing machine, And then a Chevrolet…” Alabama “Song of the South” 2

  3. Slide 3: Introduction

    Introduction  Conventional approaches to quantifying energy savings of energy efficiency  Co-benefits of energy efficiency in manufacturing  Impacts of quantifying co-benefits of industrial energy efficiency  Lessons for programs/policies 3

  4. Slide 4: Conventional Approaches

    Conventional Approaches  Energy savings potential of energy efficiency evaluation methods:  Simple payback  Discounted payback  Internal rate of return  Net present value  Return on investment  Lifecycle cost analysis  All of these methods treat only quantified energy savings  Based on ener

  5. Slide 5: Co-benefits

    Co-benefits  Energy efficiency in manufacturing results in quantifiable co- benefits:  Production increases (higher absolute and/or per unit increases)  Improved product quality (fewer passes, fewer warranty claims)  Lower maintenance costs (especially repairs)  Reduced emissions (especially fo

  6. Slide 6: Quantified Impacts of Co-benefits

    Quantified Impacts of Co-benefits  When co-benefits are quantified, ROI metrics always improve:  Worrel et al. (2003)  Simple payback of energy savings only = 4.2 years  Simple payback of energy savings and co-benefits = 1.9 years  Lung et al. (2005)  Total energy savings = $47.7 million  Tot

  7. Slide 7: Productivity Changes and Economic Impact

    Productivity Changes and Economic Impact • Just a 0.3% decline in productivity of the U.S. economy could cause GDP (in 2005 dollars) to be ~$2.7 trillion smaller by 2040 • If U.S. economy is ~$2.7 trillion smaller in 2040, this implies:  ~$800 billion fewer in 2040 than might otherwise be available

  8. Slide 8: How to Quantify Macro-Economic Impacts of Energy Efficiency?

    How to Quantify Macro-Economic Impacts of Energy Efficiency?  Integrate energy efficiency into economic production models  3-factor Cobb-Douglas example:  Output = A*La *Kb *Ec  GDP = A*La *Kb *Ec + (E – E imports) production  A is a productivity parameter, L is labor, K is physical capital, E

  9. Slide 9: Cobb-Douglas Model Example in U.S.

    Cobb-Douglas Model Example in U.S.  Assumptions:  Energy intensity reduction 30% between 1990 and 2030  Energy cost of $12.95/MMBtu (2009 data from AEO)  Energy use of 113.6 Exajoules (2009 data from AEO)  Median wages of $65,000/year (2009)  Labor force of 164.4 million workers  10% return o

  10. Slide 10: Conclusion/Lessons for Programs and Policies

    Conclusion/Lessons for Programs and Policies Conventional approaches to analyzing energy efficiency understate its impact Quantifying co-benefits of energy efficiency has two important implications:  Truer understanding of impact on output/GDP  More compelling business case A greater emphasis o

  11. Slide 11: Contact Information

    Contact Information Robert Bruce Lung industrialeeadvisor@gmail.com 202-262-7897 11

Axis NIFTY Bank ETF — IEA Roundtable on Industrial Productivity and Competitiveness Impacts (January 2014) on 6ix