Hydro One Limited · TSX:H

Hydro One — Hydro One Networks — Technical Presentation (June 2008)

17 slides from Hydro One's technical presentation, Jun 23, 2008

  1. Slide 1: Hydro One Networks: Supply to Essex County

    Hydro One Networks Supply to Essex County Class Environmental Assessment Patty Staite Environmental Assessment Coordinator Engineering and Construction Services June 23, 2008

  2. Slide 2: Definition of Need

    Definition of Need • Prior to starting a transmission facility study, it is important to have a defined and justifiable need • OPA identified the needs for the Windsor Essex area and presented two alternative solutions • Hydro One’s role is to assess the alternatives, recommend a preferred alternati

  3. Slide 3: Supply to Essex County: Alternative Transmission Options, April 2008

    Supply to Essex County: Alternative Transmission Options, April 2008 ‘iabicaan Belle River o> ——tecumseHko—_> NS f o & 3—CouNTY RO & £ i a ONION EY: & é COUNTY-RO 42 E § E 5 F fisy TOWNOF = b opayan El 5 TEGUMSEH 2 g _ TOWNOF 8 g 2 LAKESHORE 8 HIGH R HIGHWAY: 40° 3 a ' wo u ' s f mene z ' 2 5 = ; 7

  4. Slide 4: Approval Requirements

    Approval Requirements Ontario Environmental Assessment (EA) Act The facilities are subject to provincial Environmental Assessment Act approval in accordance with the Class Environmental Assessment for Minor Transmission Facilities, as a precursor to any other separate approvals. Ontario Energy Board

  5. Slide 5: Environmental Planning Process

    Environmental Planning Process The potential effects of the two alternatives were assessed using the following broad categories: • Natural environment • Cultural factors • Agricultural criteria • Socio-economic information • Technical and cost considerations

  6. Slide 6: Key Sources of Information

    Key Sources of Information • Ministry of Natural Resources • Aboriginal communities • Aerial photography • Consultation with local planners and municipal official plans • Conservation Authorities • Fieldwork • Local distribution companies and Ontario Power Authority • Public consultation

  7. Slide 7: Public Consultation

    Public Consultation • In April 2008, advertisements were placed in newspapers and flyers delivered to announce the project. These described the undertaking, maps were provided and details were given with regards to the public information centres (PICs). − Newspaper advertisements were placed in 10 l

  8. Slide 8: Public Information Centres

    Public Information Centres Location Date Attendance Woodslee: April 16, 2008 30 Millen Community Centre Leamington: Royal April 17, 2008 33 Canadian Legion, Branch 84 Tecumseh: April 22, 2008 14 Tecumseh Arena

  9. Slide 9: Transmission Alternative Preference

    Transmission Alternative Preference Woodslee Leamington Tecumseh Total PIC PIC PIC Alternative 1 2 5 2 9 Alternative 2 6 12 1 19 No 2 2 preference Did not say 1 1

  10. Slide 10: Natural Environment

    Natural Environment Potential effects of the project were considered on the following components of the natural environment: • Significant woodlots • Watercourses/municipal drains • Species at Risk

  11. Slide 11: Cultural Factors

    Cultural Factors Cultural factors taken into account were: • Built heritage • Landscape features • Archaeologically significant areas

  12. Slide 12: Agricultural Criteria

    Agricultural Criteria Basic agricultural information was assessed, for example: • Soil capability • Greenhouse locations

  13. Slide 13: Socio-Economic Information

    Socio-Economic Information Socio-economic data was collected and analyzed from maps, fieldwork and PICs: • Potential effects on properties and settlement patterns • Commercial activities (business activities close to the rights-of-way or in the study area) • Recreational facilities • Provincial Poli

  14. Slide 14: Technical and Cost Considerations

    Technical and Cost Considerations • These considerations were taken into account as discussed by OPA

  15. Slide 15: Results of the Comparison

    Results of the Comparison • When all the information was analyzed and compared for both study areas, the project team agreed that Alternative 2 is the preferred option. • As a result, we plan to move forward with: – a new 230 kV line on the Hydro One owned right-of- way between Sandwich Junction and

  16. Slide 16: Supply To Essex: Sandwich JCT to Lauzon TS

    Supply To Essex: Sandwich JCT to Lauzon TS

  17. Slide 17: Supply To Essex: Alternatives Within the Leamington Area

    Supply To Essex: Alternatives Within the Leamington Area

Hydro One Networks — Technical Presentation (June 2008) on 6ix