Kinder Morgan, Inc. · NYSE:KMI

Kinder Morgan — Kinder Morgan Energy Partners — 2009 KMP Analyst Conference

44 slides from Kinder Morgan's conference presentation, Jan 29, 2009

  1. Slide 1: The Time of the Hedgehog

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. The Time of the Hedgehog January 29, 2009 “The fox knows many things; the hedgehog one great thing.” – Archilochus

  2. Slide 2: Forward Looking Statements

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Forward Looking Statements This presentation contains forward looking statements. These forward-looking statements are identified as any statement that does not relate strictly to historical or current facts. In particular, statements, express or implied, concerning future acti

  3. Slide 3: Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Use of Non-GAAP Financial Measures The non-generally accepted accounting principles ("non-GAAP") financial measures of distributable cash flow before certain items (both in the aggregate and per unit), segment earnings before depreciation, depletion, amortization and amortizati

  4. Slide 4: Corporate Overview Agenda

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Corporate Overview Agenda  Vision – Rich Kinder  Financial Excellence – Park Shaper  Operational Excellence – Steve Kean 4

  5. Slide 5: Vision

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Vision Rich Kinder Chief Executive Officer

  6. Slide 6: The Time of the Hedgehog…

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. The Time of the Hedgehog… "The fox knows many things; the hedgehog one great thing.“ – Archilochus KMP’s model works in uncertain times  Secure cash flows from existing assets  Demonstrated access to capital  Available growth opportunities  At attractive returns  With less

  7. Slide 7: Questions You Should Ask a Hedgehog

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Questions You Should Ask a Hedgehog  What is the impact of lower commodity prices on midstream infrastructure?  Will Kinder Morgan distribute $4.20/unit as budgeted?  Will Kinder Morgan be able to fund its capital requirements in this challenging economic environment?  What

  8. Slide 8: Capital Structure

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Capital Structure Kinder Morgan Energy Partners, L.P. Market Equity (a) $11.7B Debt (b) 8.4B Enterprise Value $20.1B 2009E EBITDA (c) $2.7B 2009E DCF (d) $2.1B Additional Cash Incentive Shares Distribution Distribution KMR KMP (LLC) (Partnership) 78 million i- i-units (a) 188 m

  9. Slide 9: The Kinder Morgan Strategy

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. The Kinder Morgan Strategy Same Strategy Since Inception  Focus on stable, fee-based assets which are core to the energy infrastructure of growing markets  Increase utilization of assets while controlling costs  Classic fixed cost businesses with little variable costs  Impr

  10. Slide 10: Unmatched Footprint

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Unmatched Trans Jet Mountain Fuel Footprint Pipeline 2 Cochin  Largest independent transporter of petroleum products in the U.S. Express Pacific  Transport nearly 2 million barrels per day (Bbl/d) 2  2nd largest transporter of natural Trailblazer gas in U.S. (a) REX 4 2 KMIG

  11. Slide 11: Location, Location, Location

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. But More Important Than Size – Location, Location, Location  Products Pipelines: well-located with origin in refinery/port hubs and terminus in population centers  Natural Gas Pipelines: well-positioned in Rockies, Shales, Texas  CO2: own and operate best source of CO2 for e

  12. Slide 12: Well-diversified Asset Base

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Well-diversified Asset Base KMP CO2 2009 DCF Natural Gas Pipelines  32% CO2 transport and sales Profile (b)  58% Interstate (c)  68% oil production related  42% Texas Intrastate  Production hedged (a): 2009=73% ($49/Bbl) CO2 Natural Gas 2010=63% ($56) 27% Pipelines 2011=57

  13. Slide 13: Stable Asset Base

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Stable Asset Base Natural Gas Products Kinder Morgan CO2 Terminals Pipelines Pipelines Canada – Interstate: virtually all – Liquids: take or pay take or pay – S&T: minimum  Volume Security – volume based – Bulk: minimum – take or pay – Intrastate: ~75% volume guarantee volume

  14. Slide 14: Twelve Years of Consistent Growth

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Twelve Years of Consistent Growth Total Distributions (GP + LP) ($MM) Annual LP Distribution Per Unit (b) $2,250 $2,112 $4.50 $4.20 GP (a) $4.02 $2,000 $1,854 $4.00 16% LP 5% R= $3.48 $1,750 =4 $3.50 CA G $3.13 $3.26 GR 9 $1,469 $1,500 A 20 0 $2.87 C $1,265 $3.00 6- $2.63 $1,25

  15. Slide 15: Significant Historical Returns

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Significant Historical Returns (a) KMP: 25% CAGR (b) KMR: 9% CAGR (c) Dollars Dollars $2,000 $300 KMP = $1,469 $1,750 $270 $1,500 $240 KMR $1,250 $210 = $191 $1,000 $180 $750 $150 Alerian = $170 Alerian = $367 $500 $120 $250 $90 S&P 500 = $149 S&P 500 = $83 $0 $60 14-May-2001 D

  16. Slide 16: Promises Made, Promises Kept

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Promises Made, Promises Kept Promises Made Promises Kept Budgeted Actual Distribution per unit: Distribution per unit: 2000: $1.60 2000: $1.71 2001: $1.95 2001: $2.15 2002: $2.40 2002: $2.435 2003: $2.63 2003: $2.63 2004: $2.84 2004: $2.87 2005: $3.13 2005: $3.13 2006: $3.28 20

  17. Slide 17: 2009 Partnership Goals

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. 2009 Partnership Goals  Distribution Target  $4.20 per unit (4.5% growth)  Excess coverage of ~$14 million  Maintain Solid Balance Sheet  Expansions / acquisitions financed 50% equity, 50% debt  Deliver Projects on Current Schedule and Cost Forecast 13

  18. Slide 18: Recent Trends

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Recent Trends Impact Offset / Response  Decline in product demand – Impacts volumes on product pipelines – Annual PPI adjustment – Ethanol  Lower oil prices – Impacts unhedged crude oil and NGL – Lower cost environment; e.g. drilling, volumes in CO2 segment equipment, capital

  19. Slide 19: Continued Growth Opportunities

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Continued Growth Opportunities Current Projects (2009-2011) Additional Opportunities  Shifting Natural Gas Supply Sources — Rockies – Rockies Express pipeline – Expansions, extensions and added service on current projects and — Shale Plays – Midcontinent Express pipeline exist

  20. Slide 20: Shifting Natural Gas Supply Sources

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Shifting Natural Gas Supply Sources Natural Gas Supply (a) % Production Volumes (Bcf/d) 2008E 2013 Change Change Rockies 8.9 10.9 2.0 22% Barnett Shale 3.9 5.5 1.6 41% Fayetteville Shale 0.7 2.9 2.2 314% Rockies Haynesville Shale 0.1 3.7 3.6 n/m production Gulf Coast LNG Import

  21. Slide 21: Newbuild Natural Gas Pipelines

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Newbuild Natural Gas Pipelines Wyoming Nebraska Illinois Indiana Ohio Colorado Kansas Missouri ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE Oklahoma IN-SERVICE ROCKIES EXPRESS PIPELINE Arkansas Mississippi FAYETTEVILLE EXPRESS PIPELINE Alabama Texas MIDCONTINENT EXPRESS PIPELINE Louisiana KM LOUIS

  22. Slide 22: Increased Use of Renewable Fuels

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Increased Use of Renewable Fuels EPA guidelines require significant Renewable Fuels Standard (RFS) (a) ethanol/biodiesel blending in 2009 40 Incremental Impact R 36.0 and beyond 35 of EISA - 2007 % CAG 10.4 22 30 EPACT - 2005 8-20 Leverage Existing Assets to be Most Efficient,

  23. Slide 23: Increased Production and Use of Heavy Crude

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Increased Production and Use of Heavy Crude North American Petcoke Production (a) Despite drop in crude price, oil slate still getting heavier – 1.4MMbbl/d of incremental heavy ‘1 GR 75 69 refining capacity forecast to be added by 2015 (c) 8- A Rest of N. America ‘0 C 5 7% U.S.

  24. Slide 24: Current Major Projects

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Current Major Projects $5.8 Billion In Current Projects 2009-2011 (a) Estimated Remaining Project Cost Project Cost KM-Share KM-Share Expected Project ($MM) ($MM) Completion Rockies Express East $1,825 (a,b) $845 (a,b) 2009 (c) Midcontinent Express 971 (a,d) 552 (a,d) 2009-2010

  25. Slide 25: The Time of the Hedgehog…

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. The Time of the Hedgehog… "The fox knows many things; the hedgehog one great thing.“ – Archilochus KMP’s model works in uncertain times  Secure cash flows from existing assets  Demonstrated access to capital  Available growth opportunities  At attractive returns  With less

  26. Slide 26: ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.

    KINDER/MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.

  27. Slide 27: Financial Excellence

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Financial Excellence Park Shaper President

  28. Slide 28: ~$17 Billion in Capital Invested To Date

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. ~$17 Billion in Capital Invested To Date (a,b) (billions) Total Invested by Type (a,b) Total Invested by Year (a) $9 $0.5 $3.0 $2.9 $6 JV Contributions $2.8 $2.7 $8.4 Expansion $7.7 Acquisition $3 $2.5 $0 $2.0 $1.9 Expansions Acquisitions $1.6 $1.5 $1.3 Total Invested by Segmen

  29. Slide 29: How We Have Done: Returns on Capital

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. How We Have Done: Returns on Capital 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 2006 2007 2008 Segment ROI (a): Products Pipelines 11.9% 11.8% 12.8% 12.9% 12.4% 11.6% 11.8% 13.2% 12.5% Natural Gas Pipelines 13.3 15.5 12.9 13.5 14.0 15.5 16.7 17.6 16.9 CO2 27.5 24.6 22.0 21.9 23.8 25.7 23.1

  30. Slide 30: Cost of Capital

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Cost of Capital  Cost of capital varies over time Current ~9.75% 2008 analyst conf 9.0% 2004 analyst conf 8.3% 2003 analyst conf 9.1% 2002 analyst conf 8.2%  Long-term cost of capital ~9%  Targeted unlevered returns typically 12-15% for pipelines (higher for terminals, CO2)

  31. Slide 31: Will We Distribute $4.20 in 2009?

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Will We Distribute $4.20 in 2009?  Vast majority of $2.1 billion DCF is very secure  Impact of oil price at $50/Bbl (vs. $68 in budget) = ~$100 million  4.7% of total DCF  Sensitivity is ~$6 million per $1/Bbl change in crude price  Potential offsetting factors  Lower CO2

  32. Slide 32: Do Not Require Access to Capital Markets in 2009

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Do Not Require Access to Capital Markets in 2009 (millions) Uses – Budget Sources Sources – Alternative Growth Expenditures: Sources: Already Secured: Expansion Capex $1,188 Dec‘08 Debt Issue $500 Cash on Hand @ 12/31/08 $63 Contributions to JVs 1,472 (a) Dec‘08/Jan‘09 Swap Unw

  33. Slide 33: Access to Capital

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Access to Capital  Inception (1997) to date  $7.6 billion in equity raised (a)  $11 billion in debt (b)  Accessed in difficult markets  Sep’01 to Sep’02 – issued ~$430 million in equity (a) – issued ~$1.5 billion in debt  Aug’07 to Dec’08 – raised ~$1.4 billion in equity

  34. Slide 34: CO2 Crude Production Hedge Profile

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. CO2 Crude Production Hedge Profile SACROC & Yates Crude Oil Production (a) Avg Hedge Px WTI & WTS $49.38 $55.72 $62.54 $83.45 $106.75 ($/Bbl) 50 Net Equity Production 40 (MMboe/d) 30 73% 63% 20 57% 10 35% 5% 0 2009 2010 2011 2012 2013 Swaps Collars Unhedged % Hedged ___________

  35. Slide 35: 2010 Expect LP distribution of over $4.40/unit

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. 2010  Expect LP distribution of over $4.40/unit at flat crude oil price (relative to ‘09 budget) of $68/Bbl  Results in 8% CAGR in distributions/unit from 2007-2010 9

  36. Slide 36: Risks

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Risks  Regulatory  Pacific Products Pipeline FERC/CPUC case  Periodic rate reviews  Unexpected policy changes  Crude Oil Production Volumes  Crude Oil Prices  Budget assumes $68/Bbl realized price on unhedged barrels  2009 Sensitivity is ~$6 million DCF per $1/Bbl chang

  37. Slide 37: Operational Excellence

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Operational Excellence Steve Kean Chief Operating Officer

  38. Slide 38: Operations Goals – Safe, Reliable, Efficient Operations

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Operations Goals – Safe, Reliable, Efficient Operations  Continuous reduction in risk to the public, employees, contractors and the environment  Continuous improvement in the efficiency and productivity of existing operations  Well-executed expansions and effective integrati

  39. Slide 39: Operations Performance

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Operations Performance Immediate Risk Reduction Systems-making compliance routine Continuous Improvement  Acceleration of pipeline integrity  Addressing operations performance in  Systems Improvement work (2008 – 09) our existing processes— processes—Operations  Measuring,

  40. Slide 40: Compliance – Total KMP

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Compliance – Total KMP Total KMP 2008 Compliance Report 40,000 5.0% 35,000 4.4% 30,000 3.8% 25,000 3.1% 20,000 2.5% 15,000 1.9% 10,000 1.3% 5,000 0.6% 0 0.0% Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 Total Compliance Action

  41. Slide 41: Compliance – Terminals

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Compliance – Terminals Terminals 2008 Compliance Report 15,000 2.5% 12,000 2.0% 9,000 1.5% 6,000 1.0% 3,000 0.5% 0 0.0% Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 Total Compliance Action Items % Open 5

  42. Slide 42: Compliance – Product Pipelines

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. Compliance – Product Pipelines Pacific Product Pipelines 2008 Compliance Report 12,000 9.0% 10,000 7.5% 8,000 6.0% 6,000 4.5% 4,000 3.0% 2,000 1.5% 0 0.0% Jan- Feb- Mar- Apr- May- Jun- Jul- Aug- Sep- Oct- Nov- Dec- 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 08 Total Compliance Action Ite

  43. Slide 43: 2008 Progress; 2009 Plans

    ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P. 2008 Progress; 2009 Plans  Completed rollout of compliance systems to all KM US assets (and good compliance results so far).  Implemented enhanced ROW protection programs  Ensuring compliance with PSM/RMP requirements  Other Risk Reduction Activities  accelerated integrity

  44. Slide 44: ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.

    KINDER/MORGAN ENERGY PARTNERS, L.P.

Kinder Morgan Energy Partners — 2009 KMP Analyst Conference on 6ix