Tennessee Valley Authority · NYSE:TVC

Tennessee Valley Authority — Technical Presentation (2010)

24 slides from Tennessee Valley Authority's technical presentation, 2010

  1. Slide 1: An integrated health assessment of fish populations exposed to fly ash releases at the TVA Kingston facility

    An integrated health assessment of fish populations exposed to fly ash releases at the TVA Kingston facility S. Marshall Adams and Mark S. Greeley Oak Ridge National Laboratory Tyler F. Baker Tennessee Valley Authority

  2. Slide 2: Objectives of Fish Health Studies

    Objectives of Fish Health Studies • Determine if fly ash exposure is causing short and/or long- term health effects on representative (sentinel) fish populations • Assess potential causal relationships between levels of metals in fish tissue and various indicators of fish health

  3. Slide 3: Ash Spill, Emory River, Tennessee River

    Tennessee River > Ash Spill 2 ; . Emory River

  4. Slide 4: Fly ash spilled into river

    Ash Ash Ash Fly ash spilled Into river Ash in river

  5. Slide 5: Fly Ash Spill: Exposure of Fish to Metals

    Fly Ash Spill Exposure of Fish to Metals Focus on sentinel species (different trophic levels and home ranges) - sunfish - catfish - bass - crappie Bioaccumulation Assess Effects Analysis of 25 metals + Hg and Causality Fish Health Whole Muscle Liver Ovary Physio- Repro- Histo- Bio- fish logical duct

  6. Slide 6: Sampling sites along the river

    ERM 8 (Ref) Little Emory (Ref) ERM 3 Ash CRM 25.0 (ref) spill CR M ERM 0.9 CRM 8 7 CRM 1.5

  7. Slide 7: Sentinel species for assessing effects of contaminants on fish health

    Sentinel species for assessing effects of contaminants of fish health Bluegill - mid trophic level/omnivore - restricted home range Largemouth bass - upper trophic level/predator - intermediate home range Channel catfish - bottom feeder/omnivore - large home range

  8. Slide 8: Measures of Fish Health

    Measures of Fish Health Physiological Spring and Fall Red = short-term and sensitive indicators Indicators of: Blue = longer term and more ecologically-relevant indicators - organ dysfunction - electrolyte homeostasis - carbohydrate metabolism - protein metabolism Early warning, sensitivity, specifi

  9. Slide 9: Individual health responses of Bluegill

    Individual health responses of Bluegill 40 3 Organ Dysfunction ALT- liver function * BUN -gill function 2.5 Urea nitrogen (mg/dl) 30 ALT (IU) 2 20 1.5 10 1 Ash Spill 40 100 Glucose Carbohydrate metabolism * * Hematocrit 35 80 & hematology Hematocrit (%) Glucose (mg/dl) 30 60 Ref Ref Ref 25 40 20 ERM

  10. Slide 10: Individual health responses of Largemouth Bass

    Individual health responses of Largemouth Bass 5 0.3 Organ Dysfunction * BUN - gill function 0.25 4 Creatinine - kidney function Urea nitrogen (mg/dl) Creatinine (mg/dl) * 0.2 3 0.15 Ref 0.1 Ref Ref 2 0.05 1 0 Ash Spill 160 45 140 Carbohydrate metabolism * * Glucose 40 Glucose (mg/dl) Hematocrit (%)

  11. Slide 11: Individual health responses in catfish

    Individual healthCatfish responses in catfish 50 3 Ref Blood urea nitro (mg/dl) OrganDysfunction Organ dysfunction ALT BUN * * 2.5 40 Ref * 2 ALT (IU) * 30 * 1.5 20 1 Ash Spill 40 160 glucose * Carbohydrate metabolism Hematocrit * Hematocrit (%) & hematology 35 Glucose (mg/dl) 140 120 30 100 25 80 2

  12. Slide 12: Spatial relationship between contaminant exposure and histopathological response of bluegill

    Spatial relationship between contaminant exposure and histopathological response of bluegill 6 16 Selenium * * 15 Composite histopath score Selenium (mg/kgDW) 5 composite histopath score * 14 4 13 Ref Ref 3 12 Ref 11 2 10 1 9 CRM 8 LERM2 ERM 8 ERM 3 ERM 0.9 CRM 1.5 Ash spill Downstream gradient

  13. Slide 13: Relationship between contaminant exposure and histopathological response of Largemouth bass

    Relationship between contaminant exposure and histopathological response of Largemouth bass 5 22 Composite histopath score Selenium (mg/kgDW) Selenium composite histopath score 20 4 18 Ref * 3 Ref Ref 16 14 2 12 1 10 CRM 8 LERM2 ERM 8 ERM 3 ERM 0.9 CRM 1.5 Ash spill Downstream gradient

  14. Slide 14: Relationship between contaminant exposure and histopathological response of channel catfish

    Relationship between contaminant exposure and histopathological response of channel catfish 3 20 Composite histopath score Selenium (mg/kgDW) Selenium composite histopath score 18 2 * * 16 * 14 Ref Ref 1 12 No 10 fish 0 8 CRM 8 LERM2 ERM 8 ERM 3 ERM 0.9 CRM 1.5 Ash spill Downstream gradient

  15. Slide 15: Histopathological lesions in liver are diagnostic indicators of different stress responses

    Histopathological lesions in liver are diagnostic indicators of different types of stress responses 100.00% 18% Other 80.00% 18% Contaminants single cell necrosis 32% 35% hemorrhagic lesions 60.00% 26% 24% glycogen deletion Bluegill 37% 40.00% parasitic lesions Parasites and parasites 20.00% Infecti

  16. Slide 16: Integrated Health Response of Bluegill

    Variables entered Order of variables selected Integrated Health Response CRM 8 condition factor of Bluegill +2 visceral-som index Iiver-somc index 6 spleno-som index 2 Glucose 3 sodium ALT 7 CRM 8 BUN ERM 0.9 +1 T bilirubin 4 Little References Ash site Hematocrit 1 Emory liver histo gill histo 5 Acc

  17. Slide 17: Integrated Health Response of Largemouth Bass

    Integrated Health Response of Largemouth Bass +2 Little CRM 8 emory CRM 8 Reference +1 ERM 8.0 ERM 3.0 Ash site CRM 1.5 Reference +1 +2 +3 below ash -3 spill -2 -1 Variables entered Order of variables selected condition factor visceral-som index Iiver-somc index 4 spleno-som index CRM 25 Glucose 1 -

  18. Slide 18: Integrated health response of Channel Catfish

    Variables entered Order of variables condition factor selected Integrated health response visceral-som index Iiver-somc index 1 +2 of Channel Catfish spleno-som index 7 Glucose sodium ALT BUN 4 ERM 0.9 Creatinine 2 CRM 25 +1 Ash site T bilirubin 5 Ref Hematocrit liver histo 6 gill histo 3 Accounts f

  19. Slide 19: Relevance and Application of Fish Health Studies to Overall Scope of TVA Fly Ash Project

    Relevance and Application of Fish Health Studies to Overall Scope of TVA Fly Ash Project

  20. Slide 20: Ash spill and fish

    fish fish fish Ash spill fish fish fish fish

  21. Slide 21: Fly Ash Spill Sentinel species

    Fly Ash Spill Exposure to fly ash - Feeding type - Home range - Habitat type - Trophic level Sentinel Wildlife Species Herps Birds Fish Small mammals Benthic macroinvertebrates Adult aquatic Aquatic insect insects Mollusks nymphs ntegration of Biological Exposure and Effects over Landscape of fly as

  22. Slide 22: Application to aquatic food chains

    Application to aquatic food chains Tree swallow Racoon Frogs Piscivorous birds Adult mayflies GB heron Osprey Mussel emergence Mayfly LM bass Shad nymph Sunfish To pe riphyt Metals, detritus, Periphyton o n periphyton Se-2 Se+4 Ash

  23. Slide 23: Exposure to Fly Ash: effects and risk assessment

    Ecological Risk Assessment Assessment of Fish Health Natural Resource Damage Assess. EFFECTS EXPOSURE Ecologically Early warning Community significant Rapid response Population fitness Sensitive Reproductive Population Response Histopath structure Time scale Physiological Years Months Immunological

  24. Slide 24: Conclusions

    Conclusions - As demonstrated by various individual bioindicators, the health of all 3 species is lower downstream of the fly ash spill than at reference areas - The integrated discriminant analysis procedure indicated that the overall health of all 3 species was poorest at a site 2 miles downstream

Tennessee Valley Authority — Technical Presentation (2010) on 6ix