Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. Public Class USD Accum.Shs · LSE:PSH

Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. Public Class USD Accum.Shs — Pershing Square Holdings — Sohn Investment Conference 2015

47 slides from Pershing Square Holdings, Ltd. Public Class USD Accum.Shs's conference presentation, May 2015

  1. Slide 1: 45x Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.

    45x Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P.

  2. Slide 2: Disclaimer

    Disclaimer The analyses and conclusions of Pershing Square Capital Management, L.P. ("Pershing Square") contained in this presentation are based on publicly available information. Pershing Square recognizes that there may be nonpublic information in the possession of the companies discussed in this

  3. Slide 3: Jarden Corporation: ~45x Return in 14 Years

    Jarden Corporation: ~45x Return in 14 Years Since Martin Franklin joined Jarden in 2001, the company has achieved success as a well-managed consolidator of consumer products assets, generating a ~45x total shareholder return to-date Indexed total shareholder return of Jarden from 6/25/2001 to 5/1/20

  4. Slide 4: Investors Have Consistently Underestimated Jarden's Earnings Potential

    Investors Have Consistently Underestimated Jarden’s Earnings Potential In June 2001, investors could have purchased Jarden’s shares at ~0.4x 2016 Consensus EPS(1) Jarden’s Historical Share Price as a Multiple of 2016E Earnings (6/25/2001 to 5/1/2015) 16x 14x 12x 10x P/E Multiple 8x 6x 4x 2x 0x 2001

  5. Slide 5: Platform Specialty Products (NYSE: PAH)

    Platform Specialty Products (NYSE: PAH)  Martin Franklin, Chairman of Jarden, and private investor Nicolas Berggruen co-founded PAH in early 2013  In May 2013, PAH raised approximately $900mm(1) in a public offering at $10 per share  In October 2013, PAH announced the acquisition of MacDermid Inc

  6. Slide 6: Platform Specialty: ~175% Return in Two Years

    Platform Specialty: ~175% Return in Two Years PAH Share Price from 5/16/2013 to 5/1/2015 $35 $30 10/10/13: Announced $27.40 acquisition of $25 MacDermid for $1.8bn TEV PAH Share Price $20 5/16/2013: Began trading 8/6/14: near cash NAV Announced 10/20/14: $15 acquisition of Announced Agriphar SA for

  7. Slide 7: Nomad Holdings Limited (NOMHF)

    Nomad Holdings Limited (NOMHF) (“Nomad”)  Martin Franklin and Noam Gottesman, co-founder of GLG Partners, co-founded Nomad in early 2014  In April 2014, Nomad raised $500mm(1) in a public offering and began trading at a valuation approximating its cash per share  In April 2015, Nomad announced th

  8. Slide 8: Nomad Holdings: ~80% Return Since IPO

    Nomad Holdings: ~80% Return Since IPO Nomad shares have increased by ~80% in just over a year, driven by the Iglo acquisition announcement Nomad share price from 4/9/2014 to 4/27/2015(1) $20 4/20/15: Announces $18 acquisition of Iglo 4/9/2014: Foods Holdings Began trading for €2.6bn TEV $15 near cas

  9. Slide 9: Nomad Holdings: Why Has the Stock Gone Up So Much?

    Nomad Holdings: Why Has the Stock Gone Up So Much? Nomad’s share price has increased dramatically since the Iglo Foods acquisition was announced What are the possible explanations for this 80% price increase?  Did Nomad purchase Iglo for materially less than its fair value?  Nomad paid ~8.5x 2014

  10. Slide 10: What is going on here?

    What is going on here?

  11. Slide 11: Platform Value

    Platform Value Businesses managed by superior operators that execute value- enhancing acquisitions and shareholder-focused capital allocation have substantial Platform Value Additional Examples of Well-Known, Successful Platforms: Liberty Media 11

  12. Slide 12: Martin Franklin's Platform Strategy

    Martin Franklin’s Platform Strategy Franklin’s intense focus on value-creating capital allocation has driven significant share price appreciation across several companies  Value-creating acquisition and capital allocation strategy  Maintains high standards for quality and valuation of acquired bus

  13. Slide 13: Not All Acquisitive Businesses Create Value

    Not All Acquisitive Businesses Create Value While Martin Franklin and other intelligent capital allocators have created tremendous value through platforms, there are many examples of acquisition-intensive companies that have destroyed shareholder value  These failures can be distinguished from succ

  14. Slide 14: Valeant: An Under-Appreciated Platform

    Valeant: An Under- Appreciated Platform

  15. Slide 15: Valeant's Platform Strategy Has Created Shareholder Value

    Valeant’s Platform Strategy Has Created Shareholder Value Over Many Years An investment in Valeant shares on the day Mike Pearson became CEO has appreciated to ~45x its initial value in seven years including dividend reinvestment Valeant total shareholder return from 2/1/2008 to 5/1/2015 5,000% 3/16

  16. Slide 16: Valeant's Acquisition Strategy

    Valeant’s Acquisition Strategy Management expects to invest the majority of the company’s free cash flow in value-creating acquisitions  Large acquisitions of traditional pharma / device companies with bloated cost structures and unproductive R&D spending  Small, bolt-on acquisitions of products e

  17. Slide 17: Valeant's Acquisition Track Record & Financial Framework

    Valeant's Acquisition Track Record & Financial Framework Valeant has earned a >20% unleveraged return on the $20bn+ it has invested in acquisitions since 2008 (excluding tax benefits)(1)  Conservative underwriting of attractive returns  Target 20%+ unlevered IRR, before tax synergies (est. 30%+ af

  18. Slide 18: How Can One Evaluate Valeant's Platform Value?

    How Can One Evaluate Valeant’s Platform Value? Valeant’s Platform Value is a function of several factors: Competitive advantages of the Platform Company Valeant Operational efficiencies relative to competitors Integration track record Revenue synergy potential Access to and cost of capital Transacti

  19. Slide 19: Valeant: Bausch & Lomb Transaction

    Valeant: Bausch & Lomb (“B&L”) Transaction Transaction Background  In May 2013, Valeant agreed to acquire global eye health company Bausch & Lomb for $8.7 billion  Valeant acquired B&L from Warburg Pincus  VRX paid 13.5x 2012 Adj. EBITDA of $643 million(1) (1) Source: Bausch & Lomb S1. 19

  20. Slide 20: Valeant: B&L Transaction

    Valeant: B&L Transaction Valeant management has increased the value of B&L from $8.7bn to more than $21bn B&L Transaction Value Creation ($mm): Sources of Value Creation Low Mid High 2014 Pro‐Forma B&L Free Cash Flow $ 1,425 $ 1,425 $ 1,425 • Under Valeant ownership: Multiple 15.0x 16.0x 17.0x B&L’s

  21. Slide 21: Valeant Stock Price – Bausch & Lomb

    Valeant Stock Price – Bausch & Lomb Despite issuing equity, VRX shares appreciated 47% in the six months following press reports announcing Valeant’s agreement to acquire B&L VRX share price from 5/1/2013 to 11/29/2013 $120 8/7/13: VRX announces second quarter 5/24/13: earnings results $110 $110 6/1

  22. Slide 22: Investors Have Consistently Underestimated the Valeant Platform

    Investors Have Consistently Underestimated the Earnings Potential of the Valeant Platform In 2008, investors could have purchased Valeant's shares at ~0.3x 2016 Consensus EPS(1) Valeant's Historical Share Price as a Multiple of 2016E Earnings (2/1/2008 to 5/1/2015) 16x 14x 12x 10x P/E Multiple 8x 6x

  23. Slide 23: Why the Stock Market Undervalues Platform Companies

    Why the Stock Market Undervalues Platform Companies The traditional multiple-of-earnings valuation methodology does not incorporate Platform Value  The traditional multiple-of-earnings valuation approach:  Measures the earnings of the company’s existing asset base  Applies a multiple to earnings

  24. Slide 24: Equity Research Analysts Starting to Give Credit to Platform Value

    Equity Research Analysts are Starting to Give Credit to Valeant’s Platform Value “Valuation: Our price target is based on a DCF that includes a bolt-on sensitivity, with the increase due to a higher DCF with SLXP more than offsetting a slightly more conservative bolt-on analysis [of $50 dollars in p

  25. Slide 25: Valeant Valuation Model

    Valeant Valuation Model

  26. Slide 26: Management's $7.5bn+ 2016 EBITDA guidance implies ~$16+ EPS

    Management’s $7.5bn+ 2016 EBITDA guidance implies ~$16+ of 2016 Adj. EPS1 Valued at 16x forward earnings, this implies $250+ of value by year end 2015, a ~10%+ return from today’s stock price However, this analysis ignores one of Valeant’s most valuable assets, its Platform Value (1): Assumes $300mm

  27. Slide 27: Platform Valuation Model Assumptions – Acquisitions

    Platform Valuation Model Assumptions – Acquisitions Assumption Rationale Acquisition Multiple  4x forward sales1  Management’s long-term goal is to acquire assets for 2x to 3x sales Pro Forma Financials  ~52.5% EBITA margin  2016 corporate EBITA margin of Acquired Assets >55%  5% organic growth

  28. Slide 28: 2020 Earnings Scenarios

    2020 Earnings Scenarios We believe Valeant can earn ~$28 to ~$39 per share in 2020, if management is able to continue its historically successful capital allocation strategy Annual M&A Cap $0bn $5bn $10bn $20bn Base Business Revenue $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $ 15,000 $15,000 Revenue of Acquired Products ‐ 5

  29. Slide 29: Valuation Multiple: Summary

    Valuation Multiple: Summary If Valeant’s durable portfolio were valued within the range of multiples of businesses that we believe to be comparable, and its patent cliff portfolio were valued using a DCF analysis, then we estimate that Valeant’s forward earnings multiple would be as follows: 2020 %

  30. Slide 30: Valuation Summary

    Valuation Summary Assuming management continues to make attractive acquisitions, Valeant trades at a large discount to fair value Annual M&A Cap $5bn $10bn $20bn 2020 EPS $ 27.90 $ 32.40 $ 38.60 Values acquired NTM P/E Multiple 16.0x 16.0x 16.0x assets and base business at 16x 2020 Value (January 20

  31. Slide 31: Valeant's Late-Stage Pipeline

    Valeant’s Late-Stage Pipeline Valued at 8x its estimated peak earnings contribution, Valeant’s late- stage pipeline, excluding Salix, may be worth as much as ~$40 per share 2015 Development Expected Management Peak Sales Est. Product Description Milestones Launch Year Low High Luminesse Eye Whitenin

  32. Slide 32: Summary

    Summary  Platform companies can be incredibly valuable but are often underappreciated  A traditional multiple-of-earnings approach does not capture platform value  Investors should consider the potential for additional value creation through future acquisitions in valuing platform companies  The

  33. Slide 33: Appendix

    Appendix

  34. Slide 34: “Patent Cliff” vs. “Durable” Drugs/Medical Devices

    “Patent Cliff” vs. “Durable” Drugs/Medical Devices  Patent Cliff Products  A patent provides a legal monopoly to the inventor of a drug or medical device for a limited period of time  During the period of patent exclusivity (usually 20 years from the filing of the patent application), superior pr

  35. Slide 35: Sum of the Parts Valuation: Two Types of Cash Flow

    Sum of the Parts (SOTP) Valuation: Two Types of Cash Flow Durable Products Products: Valuation Methodology  Durable Rx  Branded Generics  Multiple of after-tax profits  OTC  Durable Devices Patent Cliff Products Products: Valuation Methodology  Patent Cliff Rx  Discounted cash flow analysis 3

  36. Slide 36: Durable Portfolio: Few Healthcare Trading Comparables

    Durable Portfolio: Few Healthcare Trading Comparables Valeant’s durable business has few peers among publicly traded pharmaceutical companies  Big Pharma  Specialty Pharmaceuticals  Few durable assets  High product  High exposure to concentration competitive, low-growth  Few durable assets cat

  37. Slide 37: Durable Portfolio: Healthcare Trading Comparables

    Durable Portfolio: Healthcare Trading Comparables Only a handful of public healthcare companies have durability comparable to Valeant's durable product portfolio  Perrigo Co.  ~80%1 of EBITA is durable – assumes large biologic drug is a patent cliff asset  Major businesses: Private label and bran

  38. Slide 38: Durable Portfolio: Healthcare Transaction Comparables

    Durable Portfolio: Healthcare Transaction Comparables Several large portfolios of durable OTC products have been sold in the last decade xForward Net Income Announced Adj. for 25% Date Asset Buyer Price ($bn) Reported Premium (1) 10/7/2005 Boots Healthcare Int'l Reckitt Benckiser $3.4 26x 20x 6/26/2

  39. Slide 39: Durable Portfolio: Trading Comparables Outside of Healthcare

    Durable Portfolio: Trading Comparables Outside of Healthcare We believe trading comparables outside of traditional healthcare can be useful for valuing Valeant’s durable business Personal Care Global Beauty 39

  40. Slide 40: Durable Portfolio: Trading Comparables Outside of Healthcare

    Durable Portfolio: Trading Comparables Outside of Healthcare We believe trading comparables outside of traditional healthcare can be useful for valuing Valeant’s durable business Long Term Industry Gross Margins Organic Growth Valeant (Durable) >70% 5% - 7% Personal Care1 50% - 60% 4% - 6% Global Be

  41. Slide 41: Durable Portfolio: Trading Comparables Outside of Healthcare

    Durable Portfolio: Trading Comparables Outside of Healthcare Comparable non-healthcare companies are valued at an average of 25x 2015 earnings 2015 P/E Multiple 30x 27x 25x 25x 22x 20x 15x 10x 5x 0x Average Personal Care (1) Global Beauty (2) Source: CapIQ median estimates as of 5/1/2015. (1) Person

  42. Slide 42: Valuation Multiple: Durable Portfolio

    Valuation Multiple: Durable Portfolio We conservatively value Valeant’s durable portfolio at 20x forward earnings Valuation Range – Forward P/E Multiple Pershing Square Average: 23x Valuation Multiple: 20x Healthcare Trading 21x 23x Comparables (1) Healthcare Healthcare Transaction 16x 29x Comparabl

  43. Slide 43: Valuation of Patent Cliff Portfolio (Base Business)

    Valuation of Patent Cliff Portfolio (Base Business) The below assumptions imply a patent cliff portfolio value in 2020 equal to eight times forward earnings  10 years of remaining cash flow, from 2020  Reflects average patent life of cliff portfolio in 2020  Assumes Xifaxin (550mg tablet) loses e

  44. Slide 44: Durable vs. Cliff Product Sales: Base Business in 2020

    Durable vs. Cliff Product Sales: Base Business in 2020 Implied Cliff Valeant Total Sales (Estimated) Product Sales 2020e 2020 $mm Sales % of Sales Valeant (ex‐Salix) Cliff (ex‐Salix) 1,150 Durable 10,600 90% Salix 3,250 Cliff 1,150 10% Sub Total 11,750 Cliff Sales 4,400 % of Total Sales ~30% Salix 3

  45. Slide 45: Platform Valuation Model Assumptions – Base Business Forecast

    Platform Valuation Model Assumptions – Base Business Forecast (No Acquisitions) Revenue: ~$11.5bn1 (2015)  ~$15bn (2020)  Valeant (ex-Salix)  2015 and 2016: sales growth consistent with management guidance2  2017 thru 2020: 5% organic growth excluding impact of loss of exclusivity; patent cliffs

  46. Slide 46: Platform Valuation Model Assumptions - Sources and Uses of Cash

    Platform Valuation Model Assumptions - Sources and Uses of Cash Sources of cash  Operations:  90% of Adj. Net Income converts to Cash Income  Leverage:  Annually leverage balance sheet to 4x trailing Net Debt/Pro-Forma LTM EBITDA  Current leverage is >5.5x Net Debt/Pro-Forma LTM EBITDA  5.75%

  47. Slide 47: Platform Valuation Model Assumptions - Sources and Uses of Cash

    Platform Valuation Model Assumptions - Sources and Uses of Cash Uses of cash  Acquisition financing and timing:  Acquisitions are cash financed  Acquisitions are made at start of year  Valeant acquires assets until annual M&A cap or leverage limit (4x Net Debt/Pro-Forma LTM EBITDA) is reached 

Pershing Square Holdings — Sohn Investment Conference 2015 on 6ix