International Public Partnerships Ltd · LSE:INPP

International Public Partnerships — Investor Day (November 2009)

184 slides from International Public Partnerships's investor day presentation, Nov 6, 2009

  1. Slide 1: Investor Day

    Investor Day 6 November 2002 "28

  2. Slide 2: Section 1: Opening Remarks

    Section i: Opening Remarks

  3. Slide 3: Opening Remarks

    Opening Remarks

  4. Slide 4: Agenda

    Agenda 10:30 Arrival 11:00 Introduction & Welcome - Keith Dorrian, Chairman INPP 11:15 Dublin Criminal Courts - Hugh Blaney & Michael Gregory, Amber; Kevin O’Brien & Alan Coakley, P.J. Hegarty & Sons; Peter McGovern, Henry J Lyons 12:00 Tour of the facilities including court rooms, judge’s chambers,

  5. Slide 5: Opening Remarks: Presenter Keith Dorrian

    Presenter Keith Dorrian, Chairman, International Public Partnerships Keith, a resident of Guernsey, is an experienced professional in the banking, finance and fund management industries. A former committee member of the Opening Remarks Guernsey Investment Fund Association he was, until his retiremen

  6. Slide 6: INPP Investment Goals

    INPP Investment Goals 5

  7. Slide 7: Investment Goals

    Investment Goals 1. Sustainable and Growing Yield 2. Increase in Capital Value 3. Robust Inflation Protection 4. Continued Accretive Investment Activity

  8. Slide 8: Sustainable and Growing Yield

    Sustainable and Growing Yield Distribution of 5.55 pence per share for 2009 (>5% yield). This compares favourably to yield on FTSE All Share of 3.4%1. Distributions paid entirely by operating cashflow and forecast to do so until at least 2038: 1. Numis Securities Research Note: “Where to Find Income

  9. Slide 9: Increase in Capital Value

    Increase in Capital Value INPP has achieved net asset value (NAV) growth of 12%1 since IPO: 1. From IPO to 30 June 2009, the date of the Company’s last published Net Asset Value. Solid potential for future growth in NAV as portfolio matures2: This compares favourably to the outlook for UK government

  10. Slide 10: Robust Inflation Protection

    Robust Inflation Protection • Movements in inflation result in changes to revenue due to the inflation linkage inherent in most of INPP’s concessions - 71% of total revenue is inflation linked, however operating costs also grow in line with inflation • Sensitivity analysis illustrates the modest cha

  11. Slide 11: Continued Accretive Investment Activity

    Continued Accretive Investment Activity INPP has a demonstrable track record of accretive investing: Period Base Case Portfolio IRR1 Acquisitions in period IPO Target: 8%-9% Seed Assets 31/12/2007 8%+ Reliance Rail Durham Courthouse BeNEX Tranche 2 Portfolio 30/6/2008 9%+ Tranche 3 Portfolio East Lo

  12. Slide 12: Conservative Approach to Gearing

    Conservative Approach to Gearing • Non-recourse Debt – Fixed term, fixed rate debt is employed at the underlying asset level and is non-recourse to INPP or any other asset – Each of the operating assets are comfortably meeting their debt service obligations: weighted average portfolio debt service c

  13. Slide 13: Performance

    Performance • A shareholder of INPP from IPO to 2 November has received a total return on investment of 26%1 • Since IPO to 2 November 2009 INPP has outperformed the following indices: – FTSE: FTSE All Share index by 28% – Real Estate: FTSE Global EPRA Development index by 46% – Private Equity: UK I

  14. Slide 14: Performance Post B&B

    Performance Post B&B INPP SHARE PRICE V INPP NAV 2.0% 12 June 2008 — Initial ASX query into B&B share price; 106 S&P places B&B on credit watch negative I | 21 August 2008 § — B&B Board & Management changes announced ingly 17 September 2008 —- S&P downgrades B&B to BB i: 10 November 2008 — S&P downg

  15. Slide 15: Initiatives Since June 2009

    Initiatives Since 30 June 2009 • Appointment of Numis Securities as broker to INPP • Appointment of John Whittle as fourth independent Director to INPP Board • Acquisition of additional stake in Brescia Hospital, Italy • Award of additional concessions to BeNEX, Germany • Acquisition of additional s

  16. Slide 16: Appendix

    Appendix 15

  17. Slide 17: INPP Portfolio

    INPP Portfolio 16

  18. Slide 18: Portfolio

    NHS LIFT Investments Project Location Mt Vernon UK Portfolio Alexandra Avenue Primary Care UK Ridge Hill and Stourbridge UK Beckenham Hospital UK Shirehampton and Whitchurch UK Garland Road Health Centre UK Sudbury Health Centre UK Gem Centre, Health Centre UK Church Road Health Centre UK Monks Park

  19. Slide 19: Portfolio By Type

    Portfolio By Type 2009 SECTOR BREAKDOWN 2009 OWNERSHIP SPLIT 30% 1% 1% Transport i | 100% ownership Education i | 50% - 100% ownership 12% 25% Health | | < 50% ownership Courts Police Authority 16% Govt Accom Health / Custodial Leisure 18%

  20. Slide 20: Portfolio Diversification

    Portfolio Diversification Total of 50 projects across several PPP/PFI sectors1 Contractual certainty of revenue streams: 99% of cashflows via availability-based mechanisms providing revenue certainty for life of concession Geographic diversity: 42% of assets located offshore, up from 10% at IPO Earl

  21. Slide 21: Section 2: Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts

    Section 2: Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts

  22. Slide 22: Case Study: Dublin CCC (Irl)

    Case Study: Dublin CCC (Irl)

  23. Slide 23: Dublin CCC Case Study - Agenda

    Dublin CCC Case Study - Agenda Presentation Team – Hugh Blaney/Michael Gregory – Amber Infrastructure – Peter McGovern – Henry J Lyons – Kevin O’Brien/Alan Coakley – P.J. Hegarty & Sons Agenda 1. Project Timeline 2. Forming the CCC Consortium 3. Designing the CCC 4. Building the CCC 5. Operations &

  24. Slide 24: Case Study Presenters: Hugh Blaney

    Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts Presenters Hugh Blaney, Director New Business Development, Amber Hugh is a founding member of Amber Infrastructure. Previously he worked with the PPP/Infrastructure team at Babcock & Brown for 16 years. Hugh has overall responsibility for the development of new pri

  25. Slide 25: Case Study Presenters: Peter McGovern

    Private & Confidential Presenters Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts Peter McGovern Dip. Arch B. Arch Sc. MRIAI, Henry J Lyons Architects Peter has been with the practice Henry J Lyons for over 10 years and has been a Director since 2003. He graduated with first-class honours from DIT Bolton Street

  26. Slide 26: Case Study Presenters: Alan Coakley

    Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts Presenters Alan Coakley, Contracts Manager, P.J. Hegarty & Sons Alan joined PJH in 1994 as a Quantity Surveyor on the Intel project. In 1999 he was promoted to Project Manager also on Intel. He is currently Contracts Manager on the Design Build Criminal Courts Comp

  27. Slide 27: Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts Overview

    Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts Overview What is the asset? • New Central Criminal Court for Dublin to replace the Four Courts – one of the most iconic buildings in Dublin • A landmark building on the corner of Phoenix Park • 22 Courts complex (including district, jury and high security courts) •

  28. Slide 28: Dublin CCC Key Facts

    Case Study: Dublin Criminal Courts Dublin CCC What is it? Central Criminal Court • 22 courts • Jury accommodation • Judges suites • Courts Administration areas • Great Hall Where is it? Dublin, Ireland When did INPP invest? November 2007 How much will INPP 100% of the equity invest? What is the conc

  29. Slide 29: Dublin CCC Project Timeline – Pre-bid

    Dublin CCC Project Timeline – Pre-bid Pre Bid Visit Irish Court Services to discuss the Feb 2004 T Zero project Interview potential consortium partners • Design • Build • Facilities Management • Lenders • Legal & other advisors Select consortium partners and enter into a T + 12m bid agreement 8

  30. Slide 30: CCC Consortium Partners

    CCC Consortium Partners M&E ENGINEER SERVICES CONTRACTOR DESIGN & CONSTRUCTION TECHNICAL DBFOCo OTHER ADVISERS DESIGN STRUCTURAL ENGINEER FINANCIAL ADVISORS EQUITY LENDERS ICT 9

  31. Slide 31: CCC Project Timeline - Bid Phase

    CCC Project Timeline - Bid Phase April 2005 Stage 1 Invite Expressions of Interest from T + 15m prospective Candidates June 2005 Receive Expressions of Interest – 11 received T + 17m Candidates are pre-qualified and ranked on basis of information provided in PQQ 4 highest ranked candidates selected

  32. Slide 32: CCC Project Timeline – Preferred Bidder Phase

    CCC Project Timeline – Preferred Bidder Phase May 2006 Stage 3 Highest ranked tenderer selected as T + 28m preferred bidder leading to detailed negotiations May 06 – April 07 Obtain Planning Permission January 2007 T + 36m Finalise Building Design T + 39m Finalise FM Specification T + 39m Finalise c

  33. Slide 33: CCC Project Timeline – Construction & Operations Phases

    CCC Project Timeline – Construction & Operations Phases April 2007 Close – Finalise contract negotiations T + 39m Commence Construction May 2007 T + 40m FM Services Ramp Up April 2009 T + 63m Construction Completion – Operations Start November 2009 T + 70m February 2035 Operations End Date February

  34. Slide 34: Case Study: Dublin CCC (Design)

    Case Study: Dublin CCC (Design)

  35. Slide 35: The Criminal Courts of Justice – Designing the solution

    Private & Confidential The Criminal Courts of Justice – Designing the solution The design of any public building is a From the exterior, the building signals and The constructed design carries the weight, challenging task. The planning of criminal literally displays the accessibility of the permanen

  36. Slide 36: Site Location

    Private & Confidential Site Location Phoenix Park Collin’s Barracks Heuston Royal Hospital 15

  37. Slide 37: Site location & context

    Private & Confidential Site location & context Urban Context Located in a pivotal position at the western Set within the walls of the Phoenix Park, the fringes of the inner City of Dublin, the chosen site is located to the western end of Parkgate site for the Criminal Courts of Justice Street at the

  38. Slide 38: External Environment

    Private & Confidential a.2.3 External Environment This relates well to the bus links from the City Centre to the west operating along The scale and age of the buildings in the Parkgate Street, the rail links to Heuston immediate vicinity of the site vary, and Station, the Luas tram line and the Arro

  39. Slide 39: Architectural Response

    Private & Confidential Architectural Response Interpretation of Brief •Achieving efficient segregation of users which impacts favourably on functionality, safety and security As an important public / civic building, the • Legibility of the building in its urban Criminal Courts Complex must set high,

  40. Slide 40: Typologies

    Private & Confidential Typologies Court Building in Bordeaux Court Building in Laganside, Belfast 19

  41. Slide 41: Functionality

    Functionality Typical Section through Courtrooms Typical Twin Courtroom Layout 20

  42. Slide 42: Initial Sketch Schemes

    Initial Sketch Schemes Scheme A Arrangement:: Observations: • Four levels of courts stacked above a ground • The offices facing onto Parkgate St in the floor service level. Courts arranged around a prime location with the courts in a secondary central atrium in which are located the main location co

  43. Slide 43: Initial Sketch Schemes

    Initial Sketch Schemes Stone Circle of Beltany, Co. Donegal 22

  44. Slide 44: The Circle

    The Circle The Circle The Circle has long standing importance in Irish Architecture. It’s cultural & functional reinvention over time is seen as an act of inheritance. The circle can be traced through history as an important device in the making of place, particularly in the public realm. Whether th

  45. Slide 45: Functionality

    Functionality Custodial Circulation Judicial Ante-Chamber & Circulation Jury Circulation Jury Retiring Room Jury Horizontal Circulation Public Gallery Public Access to Courts 24

  46. Slide 46: The Great Hall

    The Great Hall The Great Hall The Great Hall, a very specific form of Judicial Lantern enclosed urban room, becomes the living heart and breathing soul of the (Library) Criminal Courts Complex. Its simple Office volumetric expression affords an equally Building Public Restaurant simple legibility. O

  47. Slide 47: The Great Hall

    The Great Hall rn HI] ] ’

  48. Slide 48: Great Hall

    Great Hall INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  49. Slide 49: Great Hall

    Great Hall INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  50. Slide 50: Great Hall – Gallery

    Great Hall — Gallery ahi a | aD a eS INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  51. Slide 51: Typical Jury Courtroom

    Typical Jury Courtroom INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  52. Slide 52: Courtrooms

    Courtrooms INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  53. Slide 53: Typical Jury Courtroom – View from Jury Box

    Typical Jury Courtroom – View from Jury Box 33

  54. Slide 54: South Elevation (Parkgate Street)

    South Elevation (Parkgate Street) 34

  55. Slide 55: Double Skin Façade – Thermal Principals

    Double Skin Façade – Thermal Principals Summer schematic Winter schematic 35

  56. Slide 56: Facade Assembly

    Facade Assembly 36

  57. Slide 57: Facade Assembly

    Facade Assembly INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  58. Slide 58: Facade Assembly

    Facade Assembly BSEEneeeeee | 4 4 (= mT iz oa INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS Mitt

  59. Slide 59: Facade

    Facade INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  60. Slide 60: View to Main Entrance

    View to Main Entrance 40

  61. Slide 61: View From Infirmary Road

    View From Infirmary Road INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  62. Slide 62: Window to Park

    Window to Park INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  63. Slide 63: 3D – Facade Detail at Entrance

    3D – Facade Detail at Entrance 43

  64. Slide 64: Case Study: Dublin CCC (Construction)

    Case Study: Dublin CCC (Construction)

  65. Slide 65: fl eo

    7a b fl eo INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  66. Slide 66: Our Amber Experience: The Bid Period

    Our Amber Experience The Bid Period: Introduced PJH to PPP (this is the first major accommodation PPP project in Ireland). Guided us through the documentation and the ITN process, and assisted us in managing the Design Build deliverables. Helped us to understand the risks, and were even-handed in ag

  67. Slide 67: Our Amber Experience: Preferred Bidder Period

    Our Amber Experience The Preferred Bidder Period: Led us through the negotiation process with the Courts. Genuinely represented the interests of the whole consortium during the negotiations. Debated, negotiated and agreed all the difficult issues during this period. 47

  68. Slide 68: Our Amber Experience: Construction Period

    Our Amber Experience The Construction Period: Led the consortium through the period. Particularly helped with certification. They were always available to us with guidance and advice, when we needed it. Proved to be a partner that understood our business. 48

  69. Slide 69: Statistics – The Design / Construction People

    Statistics – The Design / Construction People In Total: 35 consulting companies working on design 80 subcontract companies working on construction 550 peak labour force on site, with 100 others working in manufacturing off site Approximately 2,500,000 man hours expended on site 49

  70. Slide 70: Statistics – The Building

    Statistics – The Building Key Statistics State-of-the-art complex providing 22 courts, incl 16 jury courts, incl. The Great Hall 26 Judges chambers 16 Judges anti-chambers 16 Jury retiring rooms Jury assembly for 390 jurors 36 Custodial suites, capable of holding 100 people Office accommodation for

  71. Slide 71: Statistics – Construction

    Statistics – Construction Key Statistics Site area almost 2.5 acres 11 storey building, approx 27,000 m2 Diameter of Building – 80m, diameter of Great Hall - 40m 25,000 m3 concrete & 5,000 tonne rebar in frame 27 No. Lifts, 18 stair cores 1,400 doors Clad with 12,000 m2 glazing / cladding 52 kilomet

  72. Slide 72: Tender Stage – The Site, Prior to Commencement

    Tender Stage – The Site, Prior to Commencement 52

  73. Slide 73: Our Impact

    Our Impact 53

  74. Slide 74: Construction Phasing

    Construction Phasing Criminal Courts Complex Area ‘D’ Construction Phasing North West Area ‘A’ Corner Area ‘E’ Area ‘C’ Area ‘B’ 54

  75. Slide 75: June 2007 – Construction Enabling

    June 2007 – Construction Enabling 55

  76. Slide 76: Issues – Sea Mines!

    Issues — Sea Mines! INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  77. Slide 77: Sept 2007 – Early Foundations

    Sept 2007 – Early Foundations 57

  78. Slide 78: Nov 2007 – Circle Forming

    Nov 2007 — Circle Forming INTERNATIONAL PUBL

  79. Slide 79: Dec 2007 – Block A rises to 1st Floor

    Dec 2007 – Block A rises to 1st Floor 59

  80. Slide 80: Feb 2008 - Complexity of RC Build

    Feb 2008 - Complexity of RC Build 60

  81. Slide 81: Mar 2008 - Block A at 3rd Floor

    Mar 2008 - Block A at 3rd Floor 61

  82. Slide 82: May 2008 - Block D at 2nd Floor meets Block A

    May 2008 - Block D at 2nd Floor meets Block A at 5th 62

  83. Slide 83: May 2008 – Custody Suite Construction

    May 2008 – Custody Suite Construction 63

  84. Slide 84: Jul 2008 – Steel Bridges in Great Hall & Facade Commences

    Jul 2008 – Steel Bridges in Great Hall & Facade Commences 64

  85. Slide 85: Sep 2008 – Completion of Concrete Frame

    Sep 2008 – Completion of Concrete Frame 65

  86. Slide 86: Sep 2008 – Truss Installation

    Sep 2008 – Truss Installation 66

  87. Slide 87: Sep 2008 – Truss Installation, Major Milestone Achieved

    Sep 2008 – Truss Installation, Major Milestone Achieved 67

  88. Slide 88: Sep 2008 – Glazing Commences on Infirmary Road Elevation

    Sep 2008 – Glazing Commences on Infirmary Road Elevation 68

  89. Slide 89: Oct 2008 - Aerial

    Oct 2008 - Aerial INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  90. Slide 90: Nov 2008 – Working towards Weather Tight

    Nov 2008 – Working towards Weather Tight 70

  91. Slide 91: Dec 2008 - Sample Court Room

    Dec 2008 - Sample Court Room 71

  92. Slide 92: Dec 2008 - Sample Jury Retiring Room

    Dec 2008 - Sample Jury Retiring Room 72

  93. Slide 93: Feb 2009 – Twin Skin Completion

    Feb 2009 – Twin Skin Completion 73

  94. Slide 94: Mar 2009 - Court Room Fit Out Progressing

    Mar 2009 - Court Room Fit Out Progressing 74

  95. Slide 95: Mar 2009 – Aerial

    Mar 2009 — Aerial INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  96. Slide 96: April 2009 – Window to the Park Externally Taking Shape

    April 2009 – Window to the Park Externally Taking Shape 76

  97. Slide 97: Jun 2009 - Internal Finishes to Great Hall Progress

    Jun 2009 - Internal Finishes to Great Hall Progress 77

  98. Slide 98: Jul / Aug 2009 - Balcony & Bridge

    Jul / Aug 2009 - Balcony & Bridge 78

  99. Slide 99: Aug 2009 - Victim Support Reception & Office Completion

    Aug 2009 - Victim Support Reception & Office Completion 79

  100. Slide 100: Sep 2009 - Great Hall

    Sep 2009 - Great Hall INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  101. Slide 101: Sep 2009 – Facade Complete

    Sep 2009 — Facade Complete INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  102. Slide 102: Oct 2009 – Great Hall Complete

    Oct 2009 – Great Hall Complete 82

  103. Slide 103: Case Study: Dublin CCC (Asset Management)

    Case Study: Dublin CCC (Asset Management)

  104. Slide 104: CCC – Asset Management

    CCC – Asset Management Story to date.... Preferred bidder stage – time well spent Good Partners Authority Well resourced Strong advisors Use of an output specification Build Contractor Best in class management ‘Driving’ a target programme Diligence Use of professional team Facilities Management Cont

  105. Slide 105: Section 3: PPP Pricing Update

    Section 33 PPP Pricing Update

  106. Slide 106: Market Update November 2009

    Market Update 6 November 2009 Conrad Williams

  107. Slide 107: Agenda

    Agenda • Introductions • PPP market update • Typical valuation process • Valuation issues in the current market • Outlook • Questions

  108. Slide 108: PPP Market Update

    PPP Market Update Primary markets • Global deal flow 2009 • Current UK activity UK Secondary markets • Dealflow • Motivations • Transaction “types” • Supply vs Demand shift

  109. Slide 109: Typical valuation process

    Typical valuation process Portfolio Value Base case Project equity project cash Discount rate valuation flows to equity Market discount rate Adjustment factors • Published data • Project -specific risks • Private data • Project -specific issues • Investor soundings. • Potential value enhancements.

  110. Slide 110: Valuation issues in the current market

    Valuation issues in the current market • Where is pricing now? • Methodologies and “market noise” on discounts rates…. • Nature of cash flows • Liquidity distortions? • Asset quality….has it changed? • So what are owners doing?

  111. Slide 111: Outlook

    Outlook • Current equity raising activity • Investment opportunities – growing or declining? • Impact of potential change of Government • Refinancing to return? • International dimension? • Pricing?

  112. Slide 112: Section 4: INPP Valuation Process

    Section 4: INPP Valuation Process

  113. Slide 113: INPP Valuation Process

    Private & Confidential INPP Valuation Process

  114. Slide 114: INPP Valuation Process: Presenter

    Presenter James Arthur, Fund Analyst, Amber James graduated from Melbourne University with a Bachelor of Commerce and Bachelor of Arts degree, and is a member of the Institute of Chartered INPP Valuation Process Accountants in Australia. Prior to joining Amber Infrastructure Group, James qualified w

  115. Slide 115: Net Asset Value (NAV) Methodology

    Net Asset Value (NAV) Methodology • INPP reports a Net Asset Value (NAV) every six months using discounted cashflow (DCF) methodology. INPP Discount Rate Methodology Notes Country Specific Risk Free Rate x% Country specific Completion Risk Premium + x% Stage of completion Revenue Risk Premium + x% 9

  116. Slide 116: Net Asset Value (NAV) Methodology

    Net Asset Value (NAV) Methodology Key INPP Project Assumptions Considerations Long Term Inflation 2.5% 71% of revenue inflation linked and most opex also inflation linked or periodically benchmarked. Long Term Deposit Rates c. 4% Interest income in typical PFI project approx 1% of total revenue Risk

  117. Slide 117: Case Study: Northampton Schools

    Case Study: Northampton Schools • Northampton Schools reached financial close in December 2005. Period Risk Free Project Size Risk Completion Total Rate Risk Premium Risk Premium • The design, construction, financing and provision of Premium facilities management services in respect of 30 existing I

  118. Slide 118: Increasing Capital Value – Organic Growth

    Increasing Capital Value – Organic Growth Further potential for future growth in NAV as portfolio matures: • 31% of the INPP portfolio under construction • INPP asset management team has strong track record in bringing 40 projects to completion within budget • As projects mature and the risks associ

  119. Slide 119: Investment Case – Organic Capital Value Growth

    Investment Case – Organic Capital Value Growth INPP achieves Net Asset Vale growth through: • High quality acquisitions and unique access to new investments • Active asset management to increase income • Maturing/organic growth of the Portfolio Forecasted future growth from Maturing of Portfolio c.1

  120. Slide 120: Appendix

    Private & Confidential Appendix

  121. Slide 121: World Wide Debt Cap

    World Wide Debt Cap1 A number of investors have enquired about how INPP may be affected by new tax rules seeking to reduce the ability of companies to set interest expense off against taxable income Q. What is the World Wide Debt Cap (WWDC)? A. The WWDC is a new restriction introduced by HM Revenue

  122. Slide 122: Net Asset Value Movement June 2009

    Net Asset Value Movement 30 June 2009 • NAV decreased by 3.4 pence per share mainly as a result of strong increases in risk free rates in all geographic areas • Average increase of 68 basis points over the period – U.K. risk free rate: 42 b.p. Australia risk-free rate: 163 b.p. – Canada risk-free ra

  123. Slide 123: Robust Inflation Protection

    Robust Inflation Protection • Movements in inflation result in changes to revenue due to the inflation linkage inherent in most of INPP’s concessions - 71% of total revenue is inflation linked, however operating costs also grow in line with inflation • Sensitivity analysis illustrates the modest cha

  124. Slide 124: Limited Foreign Exchange Impact

    Limited Foreign Exchange Impact • 82% of 2009 forecast distributions expected to be generated by UK assets due to early-stage nature of most of INPP’s non-UK projects • Hedging policy to be implemented progressively as non-GBP income increases to mitigate the risk that short-term movements in FX imp

  125. Slide 125: Section 5: Enhancing Asset Value

    Section 53 Enhancing Asset Value

  126. Slide 126: Enhancing Asset Value

    Private & Confidential Enhancing Asset Value

  127. Slide 127: Enhancing Asset Value: Presenter Michael Gregory

    Presenter Michael Gregory, Head of Asset Management, Amber Enhancing Asset Value Michael holds a BSc (Hons) in Quantity Surveying, MSc in Construction Project Management, Post Graduate Diploma in Law and is also a Chartered Builder. Michael joined the team in November 2002. Michael has over 12 years

  128. Slide 128: Structure of a Typical PFI/PPP Project

    Structure of a Typical PFI/PPP Project INPP - Equity Ownership Equity investment funds construction cost and in return receives predictable cashflow from project after fixed price debt service and amortisation Fixed price turnkey Asset Management costs and O&M costs have been met. Construction Contr

  129. Slide 129: Why Is Asset Management Important?

    Why Is Asset Management Important? • Protect INPP equity investment: – Contractual Structure ensures there is minimal risk with Proj Co – Revenue and cost as per the financial close base case • Create opportunities: – Pursue upside, no matter how small – Increase our profile and relationships with c

  130. Slide 130: Active Asset Management

    Active Asset Management • Passive v. Active Asset Management • Amber’s ability to do this is derived from the following: – The majority of INPP investments own the majority stake in projects – Investment held by a true long term investor – Amber is contracted to the Project Company to deliver Asset

  131. Slide 131: Active Asset Management

    Active Asset Management • Passive v. Active Asset Management • Amber’s ability to do this is derived from the following: – The majority of INPP investments own the majority stake in projects – Investment held by a true long term investor – Amber is contracted to the Project Company to deliver Asset

  132. Slide 132: Active Asset Management

    Active Asset Management • Passive v. Active Asset Management • Amber’s ability to do this is derived from the following: – The majority of INPP investments own the majority stake in projects – Investment held by a true long term investor – Amber is contracted to the Project Company to deliver Asset

  133. Slide 133: Active Asset Management

    Active Asset Management • Passive v. Active Asset Management • Amber’s ability to do this is derived from the following: – The majority of INPP investments own the majority stake in projects – Investment held by a true long term investor – Amber is contracted to the Project Company to deliver Asset

  134. Slide 134: Active Asset Management

    Active Asset Management • .....Is to manage expectations and DELIVER the CONTRACTED OUTCOMES – Contracted quality 9

  135. Slide 135: Asset Management Role...

    Asset Management Role... INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  136. Slide 136: Asset Management Role...

    Asset Management Role... INTERNATIONAL PUBLIC PARTNERSHIPS

  137. Slide 137: Active Asset Management: Deliver Contracted Outcomes

    Active Asset Management • .....Is to manage expectations and DELIVER the CONTRACTED OUTCOMES – Contracted quality – By the contracted completion date o Dublin CCC contract completion date 17 February 2010 o Dublin CCC anticipated completion date 17 November 2009 o Durham Courthouse contract completi

  138. Slide 138: Enhancing Value

    Enhancing Value • Change management – Projects take on average 3 years from inception to Financial Close – Concessions are normally for 25 years or more – Amber’s Asset Manager well placed to manage this process for the Public Sector – Fees chargeable for this service – Opportunity to invest further

  139. Slide 139: Questions??

    Questions?? aT RTNERSHIPS

  140. Slide 140: Appendix

    Private & Confidential Appendix

  141. Slide 141: Appendix: Third Party Revenue/Community Use

    Appendix Examples of Third Party Revenue/Community Use: A multi-million-pound football 'megaplex' offering 11 floodlit pitches and state-of-the-art changing facilities has officially opened at PFI School in Northampton. Goals Soccer Centres, which owns 30 other similar football facilities across the

  142. Slide 142: Appendix: St Thomas More Roman Catholic School

    Appendix St Thomas More Roman Catholic School A single site PFI School. Division One Professional football club, Walsall FC have an annual agreement with the School to have use of their 3 grass pitches on a Saturday and Sunday during the season for their teams up to under 16. There are several benef

  143. Slide 143: Appendix: Tupton Hall High School

    Appendix Tupton Hall High School One of the 2 Schools in the Derbyshire Schools Ph1 PFI. The School is a Sports College and has extensive floodlit sporting facilities including an athletics track and an All weather pitch, the school do a lot of work to ensure their facilities are used by as much of

  144. Slide 144: Appendix: Change

    Appendix Change: ‘.... The approach takes the correct steps of always owning the project, matter how small or large and knowing the status of the scheme at any one time. This has been achieved by a team building strategy, which the Authority has been happy to buy into and support with their resource

  145. Slide 145: Appendix

    Appendix £7.543.59 £2,971,334.71 £15,727.05 3] | £159,752.92 Calderdale £71,929.47 27 42 £0.00 Derby Schools 1 £106,774.37/ 19 32|| £23.625.00| Derby Schools 2 £15,673.72 20 71 £0.00 Derby Courts £11.160.76 21 20 £7.696.71 H&W Courts £23,310.59 38 30| | £224,262.84|Refer to cravieersieiceed sheet fo

  146. Slide 146: Appendix: Royal Melbourne Showgrounds Letter

    Appendix c/- RASV Centre, Royal Melbourne Showgrounds, Langs Road, Ascot Vale VIC Royal Melbourne 3032 siya Ph: 0448 554 213 Fax: 03 9281 7592 Showgrounds E: jointventure@rasv.com.au Rede ment Joint Venture 9 September 2009 Mr James Tetlow Mr Alan Casserley PPPS Solutions (Showgrounds) Nominee Pty L

  147. Slide 147: Section 6: PPP Lending Update

    Section 6: PPP Lending Update

  148. Slide 148: Developments in Bank Funding of Infrastructure assets and Funds

    Developments in Bank Funding of Infrastructure assets and Funds Ian Stocker and John Redfern RBS UK Financial Institutions Group INPP Investor Day – Dublin Criminal Courts 6th November 2009

  149. Slide 149: Amber – MBO Debt Financing by RBS

    Amber – MBO Debt Financing by RBS • Context - MBO activity levels 2009 vs. 2007 • A successful MBO - in the eye of the storm • High visibility - of contractual cash flows • Defensive - socially-required, quasi-government characteristics • Management - track record and reputation within sector • Heal

  150. Slide 150: Project Specific Lending – what has changed since 2007?

    Project Specific Lending – what has changed since 2007? • Liquidity – Lack of availability of commercial bank debt for infrastructure transactions, most banks have an increasing home market focus. How much debt gearing can still be delivered for a project? • Terms – Higher pricing, higher cover rati

  151. Slide 151: Project Specific Lending - Credit markets then & now

    Project Specific Lending - Credit markets then & now 2 years ago Current trends • Exceptionally liquid loan markets • Dramatic liquidity squeeze and contraction in underwriting appetite, with a trend to wider “club deals” or best efforts syndications rather than underwriting groups • Appetite for si

  152. Slide 152: INPP Corporate Debt Facility

    INPP Corporate Debt Facility • A bank debt club £100m - 3 year committed revolving credit facility signed during 2008 when the Fund retained a strong connection with Babcock & Brown • RBS acted as agent bank - the transaction successfully raised £100m and RBS was delighted to work with National Aust

  153. Slide 153: RBS9819

    This material is issued by The Royal Bank of Scotland plc (“RBS”) and is intended to provide the recipient (the “Recipient”) with a summary of potential transaction structures and terms and conditions that may or may not lead to transactions being entered into between RBS and the Recipient. Unless a

  154. Slide 154: Section 7: Amber Pipeline

    Section 7: Amber Pipeline

  155. Slide 155: Amber Pipeline

    Private & Confidential Amber Pipeline 1

  156. Slide 156: Amber Pipeline: Presenters

    Presenters Hugh Blaney, Head of Business Development, Amber Hugh is a founding member of Amber Infrastructure. Previously he worked with the PPP/Infrastructure team at Babcock & Brown for 16 years. Hugh has overall responsibility for the development of new primary PPP projects for Amber Infrastructu

  157. Slide 157: Amber Infrastructure – Market Overview

    Amber Infrastructure – Market Overview Attractive opportunities are currently available to investors in PPP due to the combination of: • Significant and growing global demand for Examples include: new infrastructure •Rail (Rolling Stock Renewal, Crossrail, Electrification) •Schools (Building Schools

  158. Slide 158: Amber Infrastructure – Market Overview

    Amber Infrastructure – Market Overview • 2007 and HY1 2008 saw significant activity in In 2008 Carillion sold a portfolio of PFI the “secondary market” relating to the sale of projects valued on a discount rate of existing investments in PFI and PPP projects “less than 5.5%” (source: Carillion plc).

  159. Slide 159: Amber Infrastructure - Development Track Record 2007 to 2009

    Amber Infrastructure - Development Track Record 2007 to 2009 Period Transactions Developed by Amber Team up to September 2009 1. Each of these transactions has been acquired by International Public Partnerships (“INPP”). 2007 Reliance Rail Amiens Durham Courthouse New South Wales Schools BeNEX Maest

  160. Slide 160: Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline

    Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline INPP has exclusive access to a series of opportunities: Preferred Bidder Situations Project Location Capital Expected Concession Notes Value Investment Date Length NHS Health Goscote £7.3m Signed October 2009 25 years Will provide new residential and out p

  161. Slide 161: Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline

    Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline INPP has exclusive access to a series of opportunities: Preferred Bidder Situations Project Location Capital Expected Concession Notes Value Investment Date Length NHS Health Centres Nightingale £2.7m Q1 2010 25 years Will provide new GP surgery for Hackne

  162. Slide 162: Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline

    Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline Pipeline Situations Project Capital Value Expected Concession Length Notes Investment Date Confidential £50m (equity Q4 2009 c. 20-25 years Portfolio acquisition of UK PPP assets from trade seller – - Private Vendor value) mainly operational Amber reviewin

  163. Slide 163: Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline

    Amber Infrastructure – Development Pipeline Pipeline Situations Project Capital Value Expected Concession Length Notes Investment Date Greater Gabbard £343m Q2 2010 20 years Ofgem sponsored PPP – Phase 1 Amber is pre-qualified Thanet £198m Q2 2010 20 years Ofgem sponsored PPP – Phase 1 Amber is pre-

  164. Slide 164: Asset Review: Liverpool Library (UK)

    Private & Confidential Asset Review: Liverpool Library (UK)

  165. Slide 165: Asset Review: Liverpool Library (UK)

    Private & Confidential Asset Review: Liverpool Library (UK)

  166. Slide 166: Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Presenter

    Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Presenter Mike Leto, Business Development, Amber Mike has over 14 years experience of delivering PFI projects both in the UK and Europe. He joined the Amber team in January 2006 having previously worked with ABN Infrastructure. Mike is a senior member of the Ambe

  167. Slide 167: Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Overview

    Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Overview What is the asset? • The provision of a new Central Library and Archive facility for the City of Liverpool • The project is a high profile investment for the City in a World Heritage Site located in the City’s Cultural Quarter • The project involves the

  168. Slide 168: Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Key Facts

    Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Overview What is it? Refurbishment and new build of the Central Library and Archive in Liverpool (8,600m2 new build, 4,000m2 refurbishment). Where is it? Liverpool, U.K. When was it awarded? Amber named as preferred bidder in October 2009 How much will INPP 80% o

  169. Slide 169: Liverpool Library Aerial View

    15 Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Aerial View

  170. Slide 170: Liverpool Library Main Entrance

    16 Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Main Entrance

  171. Slide 171: Liverpool Library Entrance

    17 Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Entrance

  172. Slide 172: Liverpool Library Atrium

    18 Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Atrium Central

  173. Slide 173: Liverpool Library Roof Terrace

    19 Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Roof Terrace

  174. Slide 174: Liverpool Library ICT Suite

    20 Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) ICT Suite

  175. Slide 175: Liverpool Library Childrens' Library

    21 Asset Update: Liverpool Library (UK) Childrens’ Library

  176. Slide 176: Asset Review: Offshore Transmission Assets (UK)

    Private & Confidential Asset Review: Offshore Transmission Assets (UK)

  177. Slide 177: Asset Update: Offshore Transmission (UK) Overview

    Asset Update: Offshore Transmission (UK) Overview What is the asset? • First bidding round of 9 separate assets with value of c. £1.1bn • Assets comprise onshore /offshore substations & under-sea cables connecting the mainland electricity grid network to offshore wind-farms. • Operational assets – n

  178. Slide 178: Nature of the Offshore Transmission Asset (OFTO)

    Asset Update: Offshore Transmission (UK) Nature of the Offshore Transmission Asset (OFTO) Onshore TO Offshore Transmission Owner (OFTO) Generator Connection to onshore network Onshore Substation Offshore Platform 132 kV Cable 33 kV Inter Array Cables 24

  179. Slide 179: Asset Update: Offshore Transmission (UK) Key Facts

    Asset Update: Offshore Transmission (UK) Overview What is it? 9 separate bids/assets Onshore /offshore substations & under-sea cables connecting the mainland electricity grid network to offshore wind-farms. Where are they? Offshore, U.K. When will they be awarded? 2 rounds of bidding already complet

  180. Slide 180: Section 8: Outlook

    Section 8: Outlook

  181. Slide 181: Outlook

    Outlook

  182. Slide 182: Outlook: Presenter Giles Frost

    Presenter Giles Frost, Director, International Public Partnerships Giles Frost has a law degree from the University of Oxford and is a qualified solicitor. Giles is a founder and an executive director of Amber Infrastructure Outlook Group. Giles has worked on project finance and PPP transactions sin

  183. Slide 183: Contacts

    CONTACTS Chief Operating Officer & Investor Relations Mgr: Bianca Francis Telephone: +44 (0)20 7939 0558 Email: Bianca.Francis@amberinfrastructure.com Director: Giles Frost Telephone: +44 (0)20 7939 0569 Email: Giles.Frost@amberinfrastructure.com Head of Business Development: Hugh Blaney Telephone:

  184. Slide 184: Important Information

    Important Information • The information in this document has been prepared by Amber Fund Management Limited and International Public Partnerships Limited solely for use at an information presentation about International Public Partnerships Limited (“INPP"). This document and its contents are confide

International Public Partnerships — Investor Day (November 2009) on 6ix