Medtronic Plc. · NYSE:MDT

Medtronic — Technical Presentation

27 slides from Medtronic's technical presentation

  1. Slide 1: Final Global Results from the Optimize PRO Study

    Final Global Results from the Optimize PRO Study Steven J Yakubov, MD, MSCAI, FACC Douglas Fraser, MB, BChir, MA, DM on behalf of the Optimize PRO Investigators

  2. Slide 2: Disclosure of relevant financial relationships

    Disclosure of relevant financial relationships Within the prior 24 months, I have had a financial relationship with a company producing, marketing, selling, re-selling, or distributing healthcare products used by or on patients: Financial Relationship Company Institutional grants/research support Bo

  3. Slide 3: Background and Objective

    Background The Optimize PRO study collected clinical evidence on valve performance and procedural outcomes associated with an “optimized” TAVR care pathway, post-TAVR conduction Objective Report final results from the Optimize disturbance pathway and cusp overlap technique (COT). PRO study, includin

  4. Slide 4: Study administration

    Study administration Principal Investigators Steering Committee Steven Yakubov, MD Kendra Grubb, MD Douglas Fraser, MD Hemal Gada, MD Suneet Mittal, MD Tamim Nazif, MD Josep Rodes-Cabau, MD OhioHealth Riverside Emory University Manchester UPMC The Valley Hospital NewYork-Presbyterian Quebec Heart Me

  5. Slide 5: Study design

    Study design Prospective, nonrandomized, post-market, multicenter study conducted at 50 global centers in 653 patients 1 Valve deployment was performed with cusp overlap technique (COT) and the standard procedures of the “optimized” TAVR care pathway protocol requirements. Symptomatic severe aortic

  6. Slide 6: Evolution of Evolut transcatheter aortic valves

    Evolution of Evolut transcatheter aortic valves Optimize PRO Study Valves Earlier Generations 21.5% 78.4% Subsequent Generations *0.2% CoreValve Evolut R Evolut PRO Evolut PRO+ Evolut FX Evolut FX+ 2014 2015 2017 2019 2022 2024 •First self-expanding •Recapturability •Reduction in •Lower delivery pro

  7. Slide 7: Global study sites (N=50)

    Global study sites (N=50) Inslitut Universitaire de Cardiologie Canada aye imologiede Québec (lUCPO) © Sunnybrook Health Sciences UPMC Pinnacle Harrisburg Campus (PA) Allegheny General Hospital (PA) Lehigh Valley Hospital - Cedar Crest (PA) York Hospital (PA) Prbvidence |University of Pittsburgh Med

  8. Slide 8: Patient flow

    Patient flow Global Cohort Attempted Implant N=653 Unsuccessful procedure: 1 Died: 3 Discharge N=649 Withdrew: 3 Died: 3 30-Days N=643 expected N= 640 evaluated Withdrew: 9 Lost to follow-up: 2 Died: 24 1 Year N=608 expected N= 602 evaluated 1-year analysis: Data evaluated for 92.2% (602/653) of pat

  9. Slide 9: Baseline characteristics

    Baseline characteristics Characteristic Optimize PRO Global Cohort (N=653) Age – yr 79.1 ± 6.5 Female sex 47.0% STS-PROM score – % 3.2 ± 2.5 Body mass index, kg/m2​ 29.6 ± 5.9 NYHA functional class III/IV 42.7% Diabetes 32.2% Hypertension 78.9% COPD or chronic lung disease 19.6% Cerebrovascular dise

  10. Slide 10: Key procedural data

    Key procedural data Optimize PRO Global Outcome / Assessment Cohort (N=6521) 4-step cusp overlap technique (COT) compliance 2 Yes 50.3% No 39.7% Length of stay (days) 2 (1-3) Femoral access site 100% Lunderquist extra stiff guidewire 80.7% Resheathing or recapture​ 41.3% NCC implant depth, mm, core

  11. Slide 11: Clinical outcomes at 1 year

    Clinical outcomes at 1 year Outcome Optimize PRO Global Cohort (N=653) All-cause mortality or all stroke 9.7% All-cause mortality 4.6% Cardiovascular mortality 2.4% All stroke 6.0% Disabling stroke 2.7% Reintervention 0.3% Myocardial infarction 2.9% Clinical valve thrombosis 0.3% Endocarditis 0.3% M

  12. Slide 12: Cusp Overlap Technique with Evolut PRO/PRO+ and FX

    Cusp Overlap Technique with Evolut PRO/PRO+ and FX 4-Step COT PRO/PRO+ 3-Step COT FX 1. Initial positioning: Start deployment in cusp overlap 1. Initial positioning: Start deployment in cusp view and estimate implant depth at NCC. overlap view and estimate implant depth at NCC. 2. Guidewire: Confirm

  13. Slide 13: Pacemaker implantation

    Pacemaker implantation The 30-day PPI rate was 11.1% overall and 6.4% with 4-step COT compliance. The new 1-year PPI rate was 12.8% overall and 8.9% with 4-step COT compliance. For reference, the 1-year PPI rate was 8.8% in the FX Addendum Study. 30 Days 1 Year COT followed n=328; COT followed vs no

  14. Slide 14: Valve hemodynamics through 1 year

    Valve hemodynamics through 1 year Excellent hemodynamics through 1 year

  15. Slide 15: Paravalvular regurgitation through 1 year

    Paravalvular regurgitation through 1 year No patients had moderate or severe paravalvular regurgitation at 1 year Core lab data

  16. Slide 16: New York Heart Association through 1 year

    New York Heart Association through 1 year Improvement in NYHA score by at least 1 functional class from baseline to 1 year occurred in 84% of patients

  17. Slide 17: Quality of life through 1 year

    Quality of life through 1 year >75% of patients had improved quality of life at 1-year post-procedure VARC-3 ordinal outcome: (i) death; (ii) worsened: decrease from baseline >5 points; (iii) no change: change between -5 and <5 points; (iv) mildly improved: increase between 5 and <10 points; (v) mod

  18. Slide 18: Limitations

    Limitations 1. Not all sites had access to the Evolut PRO+ valve or recommended Lunderquist wire, making protocol adherence less consistent. 2. Potential confounders could have been introduced as data was site-reported, and some variables (pre-existing RBBB, wire use, and COT compliance) may not hav

  19. Slide 19: Conclusions

    Conclusions Evolut TAVR platform continues to demonstrate a strong safety profile (2.4% cardiovascular mortality) Procedural technique drives lower PPI rates with COT compliance (6.4% at 30 days and 8.9% at 1 year) Hemodynamic performance is sustained with Evolut TAVR with no moderate or severe para

  20. Slide 20: Thank You to All of Our Patients, Study Investigators

    • University of Pittsburgh Medical Center (UPMC) Pinnacle Hospitals, Harrisburg, PA, USA • Shaare Zedek Medical Center, Jerusalem, Israel • Hôpitaux Universitaires - Hôpital Henri Mondor, Créteil, France • Morton Plant Hospital - BayCare Health System, Clearwater, FL, USA • Allegheny General Hospita

  21. Slide 21: Slide 21

  22. Slide 22: Backup

    Backup

  23. Slide 23: Optimized TAVI Care Pathway with Evolut PRO/PRO+

    Optimized TAVI Care Pathway with Evolut PRO/PRO+ Pre-Procedure Peri-Procedure Post-Procedure • 12-lead ECG • Valve deployment using the cusp • 12-lead ECG within 2 hours • Early discharge plan with multi- overlap technique • If no pre-existing RBBB or ECG disciplinary team • Pre-BAV not required cha

  24. Slide 24: Valve size and type

    Valve size and type Index Set N=652 is the first procedure that the Medtronic Evolut PRO/PRO+ System delivery catheter is introduced. *Evolut R implanted in one subject as Evolut PRO or PRO+ were not available at study site on the index procedure date. †Sapien transcatheter aortic valve implanted af

  25. Slide 25: Pacemaker implantation based on Lunderquist wire usage

    Pacemaker implantation based on Lunderquist wire usage A Lunderquist Extra-Stiff guide wire was used in 80.7% of implants. Failure to use a Lunderquist guide wire resulted in a higher 1-year PPI rate.

  26. Slide 26: KCCQ outcomes through 1 year

    KCCQ outcomes through 1 year VARC-3 ordinal outcome: (i) death; (ii) worsened: decrease from baseline >5 points; (iii) no change: change between -5 and <5 points; (iv) mildly improved: increase between 5 and <10 points; (v) moderately improved: increase between 10 and <20 points; (vi) substantially

  27. Slide 27: New York Heart Association score through 1 year

    New York Heart Association score through 1 year

Medtronic — Technical Presentation on 6ix