Business
COURT RULES IN FAVOUR OF YANGAROO PROCEEDING WITH COUNTERCLAIM AGAINST DESTINY MEDIA
Jan. 24, 2011 (Canada NewsWire Group) -- Justice Denied Destiny Relief in Respect of Three (3...
About this update from Yangaroo Inc.
[{"type":"text","content":"\n\n\n\n Jan. 24, 2011 (Canada NewsWire Group) -- \n\n#ReleaseContent TABLE\n{\n BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse\n}\nTR.cnwUnderlinedCell TD\n{\n BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid\n}\nTR.cnwDoubleUnderlinedCell TD\n{\n BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 3px double\n}\nTR.cnwBoldUnderlinedCell TD\n{\n BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 3px solid\n}\nTD.cnwUnderlinedCell\n{\n BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 1px solid\n}\nTD.cnwDoubleUnderlinedCell\n{\n BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 3px double\n}\nTD.cnwBoldUnderlinedCell\n{\n BORDER-BOTTOM: #000000 3px solid\n}\n#ReleaseContent TABLE.cnwBorderedTable TD\n{\n BORDER-RIGHT: black 1px solid;\n PADDING-RIGHT: 2px;\n BORDER-TOP: black 1px solid;\n PADDING-LEFT: 2px;\n PADDING-BOTTOM: 2px;\n BORDER-LEFT: black 1px solid;\n PADDING-TOP: 2px;\n BORDER-BOTTOM: black 1px solid;\n BORDER-COLLAPSE: collapse\n}\n#ReleaseContent TABLE TD\n{\n PADDING-RIGHT: 2px;\n PADDING-LEFT: 2px;\n PADDING-BOTTOM: 2px;\n PADDING-TOP: 2px\n}\n\n\nJustice Denied Destiny Relief in Respect of Three (3) of the Five (5)\n Grounds\n\n\nTORONTO, Jan. 24 /CNW/ - YANGAROO Inc. (TSX-V: YOO, OTC: YOOIF), the industry's leading secure digital media\n distribution company, is pleased to announce that its $25 million\n counterclaim against Destiny Software Productions, Inc. and Destiny\n Media Technologies, Inc. (DSY-TSX, DSNY-OTCBB), ("Destiny") in respect\n of its claim for defamation, breaches of the Trade-marks Act and Competition Act have been allowed to proceed by the Ontario Superior Court of Justice.\n   \n\n\nOn or about June 4, 2010, Destiny et al. brought a motion for summary\n judgment to have YANGAROO et al.'s counterclaim struck in its entirety.\n On January 20, 2011, Mr. Justice Kershman denied Destiny et al.'s\n relief in respect of three (3) of the five (5) grounds and decided that\n there should be no order as to costs.    \n\n\nWith respect to the claims for breaches of the Trade-marks and Competition Acts, the Court determined that a trial was necessary as some of the\n statements made by Destiny could arguably be construed as misleading.  \n\n\nWith respect to the claim for defamation, the Court further determined\n that a trial was necessary as again, some of the statements made by\n Destiny may be defamatory resulting in the burden being placed on\n Destiny to defend those statements.\n\n\nYANGAROO CEO, Scott Wa...