Business

XpresSpa Group Announces Dismissal of Purported Derivative Lawsuit Filed by Moreton Binn and Marisol Binn against the Company and Certain Current and Former Directors

NEW YORK, Aug. 11, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- XpresSpa Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: XSPA) (“XpresSpa” or the “Company”), a health and wellness company, today announced

articleXwell, Inc.August 11, 20205/company/xwell-inc/news/xpresspa-group-announces-dismissal-of-purported-derivative-lawsuit-filed-by-moreton-binn-and-marisol-binn-against-the-company-and-certain-current-and-former-directors
XpresSpa Group Announces Dismissal of Purported Derivative Lawsuit Filed by Moreton Binn and Marisol Binn against the Company and Certain Current and Former Directors

About this update from Xwell, Inc.

[{"type":"text","content":"NEW YORK, Aug. 11, 2020 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- XpresSpa Group, Inc. (Nasdaq: XSPA) (“XpresSpa” or the “Company”), a health and wellness company, today announced that U.S. District Court Judge Gregory Woods dismissed the purported derivative lawsuit that was filed in Manhattan federal court in June 2019 by Moreton Binn and Marisol Binn (through a limited liability company) against XpresSpa; certain of its current and former directors; Rockmore Investment Master Fund, L.P.; B3D, LLC; and Brian Daly. \n On October 23, 2019, XpresSpa and the other defendants filed a motion to dismiss the complaint in its entirety and with prejudice. On July 13, 2020, Magistrate Judge Sarah Cave issued a 76-page Report and Recommendation recommending that Judge Woods grant XpresSpa’s motion to dismiss in its entirety for three independent reasons: the Binns had failed to make a pre-suit demand on XpresSpa’s independent Board of Directors (a requirement for any derivative lawsuit);the Binns were not fair and adequate representatives of XpresSpa’s shareholders for the purposes of a derivative lawsuit, as there was “evidence of ‘economic antagonisms’ between Plaintiffs and Defendants” and “the Binns hav[ing] an outsized personal interest in this litigation,” and that these facts “illustrate a potential vindictiveness by the Binns towards Defendants”; andthe Binns failed to state any plausible claims for relief with respect to any of their claims. Magistrate Judge Cave also recommended to Judge Woods that the Binns’ request to amend their complaint be denied because it “would be allowing them a ‘third bite at the apple.’” The Binns did not object to the Report and Recommendation, and Judge Woods adopted the Report and Recommendation in its entirety on August 6, 2020, thereby dismissing all of the Binns’ claims with prejudice, meaning that the Binns cannot re-litigate these claims again. This was the third lawsuit that the Binns or their longtime counsel have brought against XpresSpa and its former and current directors and certain other parties in the past two years. A different federal judge had previously dismissed the two earlier lawsuits. Bruce Bernstein, XpresSpa’s Chairman, stated, “We are very happy with the court’s decision. None of the lawsuits brought by the Binns or their lawyers against XpresSpa, its directors and certain investors had any factu...

More updates from Xwell, Inc.