Press release

Regeneron Prevails over Amgen in Antitrust PCSK9 Lawsuit Protecting Biotech Innovation and Patient Access to Life-Saving Treatments

Federal court jury found Amgen liable for violating antitrust and tort laws by using cross-therapeutic bundled rebates to prevent Praluent® (alirocumab) from

articleRegeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.May 15, 20253/company/regeneron-pharmaceuticals-inc/news/regeneron-prevails-over-amgen-antitrust-pcsk9-lawsuit-protecting-biotech-innovation
Regeneron Prevails over Amgen in Antitrust PCSK9 Lawsuit Protecting Biotech Innovation and Patient Access to Life-Saving Treatments

About this update from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.

[{"type":"text","content":"Federal court jury found Amgen liable for violating antitrust and tort laws by using cross-therapeutic bundled rebates to prevent Praluent® (alirocumab) from competing in the market Jury awarded Regeneron $135.6 million dollars of compensatory damages and $271.2 million dollars in punitive damages TARRYTOWN, N.Y., May 15, 2025 (GLOBE NEWSWIRE) -- Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc. (NASDAQ: REGN) applauds the jury verdict in the U.S. District Court for the District of Delaware that found that Amgen Inc. violated antitrust and tort laws by creating a bundling scheme that illegally leveraged its blockbuster anti-inflammatory drugs Enbrel® (etanercept) and Otezla® (apremilast) to convince pharmacy benefit managers (PBMs) to select Repatha® (evolocumab) as the exclusive PCSK9 category product over Praluent® (alirocumab). The jury found that Amgen violated the Clayton Act, the Sherman Act, the New York State Donnelly Act, the California Cartwright Act and Delaware tort law. Enbrel and Otezla are therapeutically different medicines that do not treat the heart conditions that Praluent or Repatha address. Amgen threatened to withhold rebates unless PBMs preferred Repatha and excluded Praluent. Amgen prevented Regeneron from competing on a level playing field and unfairly denied patients access to Praluent. This anticompetitive practice shut out an innovative therapy from the PCSK9 marketplace, not based on clinical merit or price. Because of Amgen’s size and unrelated product portfolio, their anticompetitive actions ultimately hurt competition and patients. The jury awarded Regeneron $135.6 million dollars of compensatory damages. The jury also awarded Regeneron $271.2 million dollars in punitive damages. Punitive damages may be awarded to punish a party for outrageous conduct and deter a party, and others like it, from engaging in similar conduct in the future. \"Patients rely on the biotech industry to find solutions for their most urgent medical conditions. At Regeneron, we take this responsibility very seriously and are committed to delivering breakthrough therapies that improve patient lives. To achieve this, companies must be able to compete fairly based on the clinical and economic value of their products. Larger companies should not be allowed to use anticompetitive tactics to push competitors out of the market,\" said Leonard S. Sc...

More updates from Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc.