Business
NXT INVESTOR DEADLINE: Nextracker Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Class Action Lawsuit
San Diego, California--(Newsfile Corp. - February 5, 2025) - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd L...
About this update from Nextgen Digital Platforms, Inc.
[{"type":"text","content":"NXT INVESTOR DEADLINE: Nextracker Inc. Investors with Substantial Losses Have Opportunity to Lead Securities Class Action LawsuitSan Diego, California--(Newsfile Corp. - February 5, 2025) - Robbins Geller Rudman & Dowd LLP announces that purchasers of Nextracker Inc. (NASDAQ: NXT) common stock between February 1, 2024 and August 1, 2024, inclusive (the \"Class Period\"), have until Tuesday, February 25, 2025 to seek appointment as lead plaintiff of the Nextracker class action lawsuit. Captioned Weber v. Nextracker Inc., No. 24-cv-09467 (N.D. Cal.), the Nextracker class action lawsuit charges Nextracker as well as certain of Nextracker's top executive officers with violations of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934.If you suffered substantial losses and wish to serve as lead plaintiff of the Nextracker class action lawsuit, please provide your information here:https://www.rgrdlaw.com/cases-nextracker-inc-class-action-nxt.html You can also contact attorneys J.C. Sanchez or Jennifer N. Caringal of Robbins Geller by calling 800/449-4900 or via e-mail at [email protected] ALLEGATIONS: Nextracker is a supplier of software solutions and products that enable solar panels to follow the sun's movements across the sky to optimize utility power plant performance.The Nextracker class action lawsuit alleges that throughout the Class Period defendants made false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) the impact of project delays on Nextracker's business, financial results, and prospects was far more severe than represented to investors; (ii) permitting and interconnection delays had materially impaired Nextracker's ability to convert backlog into revenue at historical conversion rates; (iii) Nextracker had been unable to offset the negative impact from project delays through increased client demand and the purported ability to pull forward its other projects in the manner represented by defendants; (iv) Nextracker did not possess the competitive advantages which purportedly shielded it from industry-wide headwinds or the ability to effectively offset the adverse effects of project delays as claimed by defendants; and (v) consequently, defendants lacked a reasonable basis for their positive statements about Nextracker's business, financial results, and prospects.The Nextracker class action lawsuit further allege...