Business
The Gross Law Firm Announces Class Actions on Behalf of Shareholders of NAK, KNDI and DECN
The Gross Law Firm Announces Class Actions on Behalf of Shareholders of NAK, KNDI and DECN.
About this update from Decision Diagnostics Corp
[{"type":"text","content":"NEW YORK, NY / ACCESSWIRE / January 19, 2021 / The securities litigation law firm of The Gross Law Firm issues the following notice on behalf of shareholders in the following publicly traded companies. Shareholders who purchased shares in the following companies during the dates listed are encouraged to contact the firm regarding possible Lead Plaintiff appointment. Appointment as Lead Plaintiff is not required to partake in any recovery.Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. (NYSE:NAK)Investors Affected: December 21, 2017 - November 25, 2020A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Northern Dynasty Minerals Ltd. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (1) the Company's Pebble Project was contrary to Clean Water Act guidelines and to the public interest; (2) the Company planned that the Pebble Project would be larger in duration and scope than conveyed to the public; (3) as a result, the Company's permit applications for the Pebble Project would be denied by the U.S. Army Corps of Engineers; and (4) as a result, Defendants' public statements were materially false and/or misleading at all relevant times.Shareholders may find more information at https://securitiesclasslaw.com/securities/northern-dynasty-minerals-ltd-loss-submission-form/?id=12277&from=1Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. (NASDAQ:KNDI)Investors Affected: March 15, 2019 - November 27, 2020A class action has commenced on behalf of certain shareholders in Kandi Technologies Group, Inc. The filed complaint alleges that defendants made materially false and/or misleading statements and/or failed to disclose that: (i) Kandi artificially inflated its reported revenues through undisclosed related party transactions, or otherwise had relationships with key customers that indicated those customers did not have an arms length relationship with Kandi; (ii) the majority of Kandi's sales in the past year had been to undisclosed related parties and/or parties with such a close relationship and history with Kandi that it cast doubt on the arms-length nature of their relationship; (iii) all the foregoing, once revealed, was foreseeably likely to cast doubt on the validity of Kandi's reported revenues and, in turn, have a foreseeable negative impact on the Company...